![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Option A or Option B? | |||
Option A: 321 + 116610LV |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
82 | 55.03% |
Option B: 126500LN + aqua Ingenieur |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
67 | 44.97% |
Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 48,784
|
Interesting options presented. I would not buy the 321 as I do not see enough of a difference between the 321 and the 3861 to justify the extra 10-12K. I am a huge Omega fan and have stated this opinion before but to each their own. I would keep the Hulk, though I sold mine this year, as it is a cool watch and unless you just want something different it covers the Submariner/dive side watch. The IWC is not for me and once again the price is not justified for what it is to me. Even in the secondary market they are way over priced. My AD is an IWC dealer and I have seen the watch and I can go so many other places for the money I would not. Now I have told you what I would not do so how about what I would do. The Daytona is a cool watch and a huge flex piece. If that is the one then that is the one so to say. I know you said brand diversity but for two significant pieces like the Hulk and the Daytona I might be able to make it without that diversity for a while. I assume you would be buying the Daytona in the secondary market and while prices have moderated slightly they are still significant. I might keep the Hulk, add the 3861 in the white dial and call it a day. Nice to have so many options. Let us know what you decide.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,888
|
I like option C as of now.
Enjoy the process my friend! You've had a great relationship with that LV and I think you might miss it. The white dial Ing is my favorite. I could see the LV + white Ing as a great option (sorry to add to the mix ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Mike
Location: Illinois
Watch: BLNR VTNR PAM 915
Posts: 2,044
|
B for me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,600
|
Of the choices presented Option A is the answer, both give rise to strong feelings, my acquisition barometer. I am indifferent to Option B, I don’t dislike them I simply feel nothing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: America
Posts: 261
|
Tough choice. I would go with an Option C (Option Chronograph) with the 321 and the Daytona. That Omega 321 Calibre is a classic; it's a beast. And the Daytona, no words can adequately express how important and beautiful it is. Both watches are horologic titans.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | ||||
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,667
|
Thanks all for the messages.
![]() ![]() ![]() It’s a fun process thinking this through with you. :cheers. Quote:
![]() ![]() As for the comfort of the 321 vs Daytona, I know the 12 series Daytona fits like a beautiful glove…. I just need to find a 321 to try! All of the boutiques in Paris have told me the 321 isn’t even an exhibition model for them. So I’ve started contacting watch dealers…. Quote:
As for 3861, I strongly prefer the black to the white. As for 3861 vs 321, I find myself strongly drawn to the 321’s movement and greater authenticity, plus the looks. For me, when talking MSRP, it’s worth the €8k extra. Especially for a “crowning jewel” of my collection. Thanks for your thoughts. ![]() Quote:
![]() As for the IWC, I know you like the white Ingenieur best. It’s surely a beauty, but with my GS’s silver dial, I’m looking for something other than white. Quote:
I’m wondering if your reference to the 321 being a “beast” is about the significance and beauty of the watch, or if it’s about the perceived thickness some make comments about? |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Roger Lococco
Location: Asia
Watch: 126719BLRO Pepsi
Posts: 3,005
|
__________________
116500 Daytona White Dial 126710BLNR GMT II 126719BLRO Blue Dial Pepsi GMT II |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,610
|
Option A
__________________
116610LV / Flat Bluesy 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170 / PAM360 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Hey Cru, delighted to read I am younger than you my friend, well only just.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Hey Cru, delighted to read I am younger than you mon ami, well, only just.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,663
|
I would definitely not consider the 321 a beast it just sits up a touch like a Rolex diver due to the case back. Whereas the daytona sits flat but of course no gorgeous 321 to look at. The action on the 321 is lovely as well and I do sincerely appreciate the properly graduated sub dials.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,246
|
Option A. 321 and panda Daytona if you can.
__________________
♛ ✠ Ω 2FA Active |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,433
|
option c speedy & daytona lol
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 889
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,172
|
Daytona & LV
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Florida
Watch: SD43
Posts: 511
|
Talk about,Can’t make a bad choice here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | ||
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,667
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I’m glad my advancing age is making someone happy!! ![]() Good seeing you’re back…. Now ignore all nicknames! Sorry, couldn’t resist teasing you a bit. :-) ![]() ![]() ![]() I don’t see a LVc/IWC combo in my future, but I appreciate having another admirer of that watch. Seems like there aren’t many! ;-) Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,754
|
My choice was a 2008 SpeedMaster sapphire sandwich and a 16610LV.
![]()
__________________
E |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 | |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,593
|
Quote:
There is no wrong answer, put in your collection what makes you happy. Happy birthday! ![]()
__________________
GMT II 126719 Meteorite + GMT II 126710BLRO + Daytona 116500LN (White) + Submariner 16610LV + Explorer II 16570 Polar + Submariner 116610LV + GMT II 16713 Rootbeer + Sky-Dweller 336934 (Blue) + GMT II 16710 (Pepsi & Coke) + Sea-Dweller 116600 Breitling Premier B25 Datora 2FA Security Active |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Watch: YM42 Ti
Posts: 2,645
|
I’m all for experiencing other brands, but considering these four particular watches, I would keep the Daytona and Submariner. So Option C. They’re just a step above the other two, in my opinion.
__________________
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.