The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 November 2024, 07:47 AM   #31
helloworldies
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: ireland
Watch: 5167a
Posts: 318
My wrist is the same size and I love my black 216570!
helloworldies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2024, 02:25 PM   #32
dduranceau
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Phoenix
Watch: 116600
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanCho View Post
6.3" flat wrist:



Wow! Looks incredible on you. Truly goes to show that it’s not just about wrist size as a number. I’d say you wear the 216570 better with a 6.3” wrist than many do with a 7”. Cheers!
dduranceau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 12:54 AM   #33
Nads786
"TRF" Member
 
Nads786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Real Name: Nadeem
Location: Chicago
Watch: GMT BLNR
Posts: 1,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by the dark knight View Post
I owned a Polar and black 216570 back in the day, 6.5 inch wrists. Having said that I am also 220 lbs, so probably not a small person, just small wrists. So I thought overall they looked good on me. But I also tend to think wrist size alone is a fairly meaningless measurement when evaluating a watch, wrist shape and overall size of the wearer is probably more meaningful.

Honestly when considering the 6 digit trio of Sub, Exp II, and GMT, I thought the Exp II wore the best because of it's super flat caseback.
This is an important consideration for me because I find the gmt way more comfortable than the sub.

Are you saying the Polar is more comfortable than the GMT?
Nads786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2024, 05:03 PM   #34
Mausbiber
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Sven
Location: Germany
Watch: EX2 216570 BD
Posts: 92
It's not really true that there is a noticeable difference between the 216570 and the 226570 on the wrist. Anyone who claims this can also feel temperature differences of 1 degree.
It depends on the contact surface on the wrist and personal preferences. If you like it and it feels good then wear the EX2 and it doesn't matter what others say.
Mausbiber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2024, 05:30 AM   #35
StanCho
"TRF" Member
 
StanCho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Croatia
Posts: 355
Quote:
Originally Posted by dduranceau View Post
Wow! Looks incredible on you. Truly goes to show that it’s not just about wrist size as a number. I’d say you wear the 216570 better with a 6.3” wrist than many do with a 7”. Cheers!
Thank you. The thing is, when looking at a watch from the perspective of yourself, most watches seem big even with no lug overhang. They need to be seen from several distances with the arm in regular position for proper impression of how the watch really looks like on somebody. I try to check from 1m or 2m distance in the mirror before making a conclusion.

In any case, there is no lug overhang with this one, hell I even pull of a 44mm Panerai in a classic Betarini case without lug overhang. :)
StanCho is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.