ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Jackie Daytona · 19 December 2024, 12:14 PM

It’s really beautiful but I. Not sure about $55k

Onequik135i · 23 December 2024, 08:52 AM

I would never spend that coin on a new one like that. If anything I would apply the funds towards a 90s vintage model.

Horologest · 14 January 2025, 01:49 AM

You are paying that price point almost exclusively for the value of solid 950 platinum. It's a big heavy watch and a lot of platimum.

1William · 15 January 2025, 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horologest

You are paying that price point almost exclusively for the value of solid 950 platinum. It's a big heavy watch and a lot of platimum.

The amount of Platinum does not reflect the price. Someone will come along in a bit and give you the price of Platinum and based on weight the amount in the watch. Plenty of discussion on the Rolex side of thing as to why the disparity and the general conclusion is that it is seen as more exclusive.

19 December 2024, 12:14 PM	#31
Jackie Daytona "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2019 Real Name: Brian Location: Nashville Watch: 16750 Posts: 6,765	It’s really beautiful but I. Not sure about $55k __________________ 16750 \| 6516(wife’s) \| 126334 \| 16570 \| SBGA413 \| SRPE33 \| 126610LV

23 December 2024, 08:52 AM	#32
Onequik135i "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Tampa, Florida Watch: 116610LV Posts: 2,601	I would never spend that coin on a new one like that. If anything I would apply the funds towards a 90s vintage model. __________________ 116610LV / Flat Bluesy 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170 / PAM360

14 January 2025, 01:49 AM	#33
Horologest "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2024 Real Name: Eli Hardof Location: Las Vegas NV Watch: Panerai Posts: 19	You are paying that price point almost exclusively for the value of solid 950 platinum. It's a big heavy watch and a lot of platimum.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)