**OFFICIAL RICHARD MILLE PIC THREAD (and daily snap shots)**

[turfmanjon]

Originally Posted by marblegardens

Apologies if there’s a better thread to ask this Q but couldn’t find it… does anyone know the current retail price for the 67-01 in USD?

About $150k after tax is what I was quoted last Fall in Chicago.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[marblegardens]

Thanks for the reply.

Does anyone know how the titanium model of the 67-01 ages? What does it look like scratched up and patinaed? If anyone has pics, I'd be very grateful.

For context, I'm looking to buy my first RM and hovering back and forth between gold and titanium. I like the titanium for it's discreetness but it's lighter color makes me wonder if it'll work well for all straps like the rose gold version. I am also trying to understand if the bezel is more prone to scratches in either metal

[rmlovett1]

Time for those spring/summer straps



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[turfmanjon]

Good call!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[rmlovett1]

Originally Posted by turfmanjon

Good call!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Love the yellow!

[turfmanjon]

Originally Posted by rmlovett1

Love the yellow!

Thanks. Color swaps make a new watch!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Soondooboo]

Anybody know how the RM67-01 fits vs. the RM 10? Looks like RM67 is slightly smaller but has a bigger dial, so for some reason it always looks a bit too "tall" in pics?

[rmlovett1]

Originally Posted by Soondooboo

Anybody know how the RM67-01 fits vs. the RM 10? Looks like RM67 is slightly smaller but has a bigger dial, so for some reason it always looks a bit too "tall" in pics?

RM 010 measured 48 mm long x 39.30 mm wide x 13.84 mm
RM 67 01 measures 38.7 mm wide and 47.52 mm long, with an ultra-thin thickness of about 7.75 mm,

[Soondooboo]

Originally Posted by rmlovett1

RM 010 measured 48 mm long x 39.30 mm wide x 13.84 mm
RM 67 01 measures 38.7 mm wide and 47.52 mm long, with an ultra-thin thickness of about 7.75 mm,

Thanks for the measurements! Yeah the 67 has smaller dimensions, but for some reason the RM010 never looks big but the RM67 looks oversized on a lot of ppl's wrists. I think mostly because the bezel is smaller, and also curves a bit less than the RM010? If anyone owns both would be cool to see some pics.

[7sins]

Originally Posted by Soondooboo

Thanks for the measurements! Yeah the 67 has smaller dimensions, but for some reason the RM010 never looks big but the RM67 looks oversized on a lot of ppl's wrists. I think mostly because the bezel is smaller, and also curves a bit less than the RM010? If anyone owns both would be cool to see some pics.

I've owned the 010 and tried on the 67 many times. The 010 is much thicker and wears larger than the 67, optically it might appear bigger but you would need the same size wrist on both to properly compare. The 67 wears quite small, I found on my 6.7" it was way too small. IMO the 67 wears more dressy and the 010 much sportier. Of the two, would gravitate towards the 010, or spend a few extra bucks for the 030.

[bigsid05]

Originally Posted by 7sins

I've owned the 010 and tried on the 67 many times. The 010 is much thicker and wears larger than the 67, optically it might appear bigger but you would need the same size wrist on both to properly compare. The 67 wears quite small, I found on my 6.7" it was way too small. IMO the 67 wears more dressy and the 010 much sportier. Of the two, would gravitate towards the 010, or spend a few extra bucks for the 030.

Curious, if you've tried one how do you find that the PP 5167 fits your wrist?

I ask because I have a similar sized wrist (~6.75") and find the 67-01 to be a perfect fit. Love the slim profile. But I also love how nicely the 5167 sits on my wrist.

[7sins]

Originally Posted by bigsid05

Curious, if you've tried one how do you find that the PP 5167 fits your wrist?

I ask because I have a similar sized wrist (~6.75") and find the 67-01 to be a perfect fit. Love the slim profile. But I also love how nicely the 5167 sits on my wrist.

Felt the 5167 was small on my wrist too, I suppose it is optics as my 030 dwarfed them in size. As well as preference and certainly subjective to what feels big or small.

IMO the RM72 is the perfect size and balance. Would love a 67-02, hopefully that's next.

[rmlovett1]

Originally Posted by bigsid05

Curious, if you've tried one how do you find that the PP 5167 fits your wrist?

I ask because I have a similar sized wrist (~6.75") and find the 67-01 to be a perfect fit. Love the slim profile. But I also love how nicely the 5167 sits on my wrist.

My wrist is 6 3/4 - 6 7/8 or so. I tried on the 5167 and it wears like a Daytona without the pushers, so a bit smaller IMO. The 67 01 is nice but definitely looks on the small size, I think because of the thinness. I like the RM tonneau shape because it wears bigger IMO, even when the on paper dimensions are the same as a round watch like the Daytona. I agree with B ⬇️⬇️⬇️, the 72 01 is a perfect size RM for a wrist 6.5- 7.0.

Originally Posted by 7sins

Felt the 5167 was small on my wrist too, I suppose it is optics as my 030 dwarfed them in size. As well as preference and certainly subjective to what feels big or small.

IMO the RM72 is the perfect size and balance. Would love a 67-02, hopefully that's next.

Agreed…72 is an outstanding size.

[Soondooboo]

Originally Posted by rmlovett1

My wrist is 6 3/4 - 6 7/8 or so. I tried on the 5167 and it wears like a Daytona without the pushers, so a bit smaller IMO. The 67 01 is nice but definitely looks on the small size, I think because of the thinness. I like the RM tonneau shape because it wears bigger IMO, even when the on paper dimensions are the same as a round watch like the Daytona. I agree with B ⬇️⬇️⬇️, the 72 01 is a perfect size RM for a wrist 6.5- 7.0.


Agreed…72 is an outstanding size.

Maybe it's an optical illusion but in most pics of the 67-01, it always looks too big on ppl's wrists...like it takes up nearly the whole real estate of the flat part vertically but also looks narrow.