ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 October 2010, 12:55 PM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
|
28 October 2010, 01:26 PM | #62 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: BKK
Watch: 16610
Posts: 116
|
None. I think all this talk about "investment" is mainly a way to justify the purchase!! If you think about it, there are a million better investments out there
|
28 October 2010, 01:31 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: BraSil
Watch: Sub 16610
Posts: 131
|
No one
I think a modern Rolex would only be a good investment if you got a huge discount on a watch that sells well and it's not usually discounted.
But even so it's not a good investment, just a good way of loosing less money to aprecciate a new watch. |
28 October 2010, 02:23 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Winnipeg
Watch: DD&YM&DaytonaOMy
Posts: 294
|
Actually, all my watches are investments. They pay a non-monetary dividend each time I put them on, or even just glance at them in the winder.
And that's a tax-free dividend to boot! m. |
28 October 2010, 10:56 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 389
|
Lets face it £500.00 profit in 8 years is not a lot, but i wore that watch all the time and enjoyed it, plus i didnt have to feed it, it served a purpose and gave me plesure then gave me back £500.00 for the privelidge of owning it. I am sorry but you missed the point, if that money had been sat in the bank earning the crappy intrest we are getting now it wouldnt have pleased me at all..............
|
29 October 2010, 12:03 AM | #66 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Watch: 16610 V
Posts: 511
|
i don't know why folks keeping recommending lv subs... this was suppose to be a limited edition watch, it's been going strong now for 10+ years. that's not limited. i'm going to defend the SD as the best appreciating rolex watch going forward on a relative basis. the DSSD was polarzing. the SD was a sub destroyer. the SD is no longer being produced, this will increase value, as evident in $ commanded. plus, the nitty gritty of this watch is unreal, 4x the depth capacity as the sub, similar looks, simply, the best of the no-date, dssd, sub... this is the perfect rolex
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.