ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 November 2011, 07:59 AM | #61 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
But as much as I nag about the Deepsea, I do think it is a piece of superlative engineering and there sure is something mysteriously special about it. It is totally a love/hate thing, I painfully admit that I've owned this watch multiple times and there might be more! :-)
I don't think people here are DSSD-haters as much as there are certain people (I might be one of them...) who generally don't like over-sized watches, and the DSSD is pretty much the only one in the Rolex camp, so there is where the critique land! |
22 November 2011, 08:07 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston
Watch: 116509 BlackArabic
Posts: 1,176
|
I tried to love it, couldnt get past how "funny" it looked on my wrists.
It just doesnt sing to me.
__________________
Life is an adventure or nothing at all. |
22 November 2011, 08:10 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Dan
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: 116505
Posts: 1,587
|
Well I CAN'T WAIT to get mine this week, and I haven't got huge wrists!
__________________
16710-116505-116660-116680-116610LV-216570-126331-116710-114060-126621-TudorGMT-Tudor BB58-Sapphire Speedy Pro-Speedy Rising Sun |
22 November 2011, 08:25 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,425
|
This explains my feeling almost exactly...
|
22 November 2011, 10:16 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
|
22 November 2011, 10:42 AM | #66 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NY
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 109
|
|
22 November 2011, 10:52 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Craig
Location: Seattle-ish, USA
Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc
Posts: 7,022
|
It's a serious piece of equipment. For me the issue was the height. My wrists are only 6.25" and I looked like a little man in a big suit when I tried it on.
I get the big guy wearing a big watch thing. I just don't understand all the regular Joes into the big is better craze. Big Humvee, DSSD, triple patty burger...whatever. Not bashing the watch, though, as different opinions make the world an interesting place. |
22 November 2011, 11:11 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston
Watch: 116509 BlackArabic
Posts: 1,176
|
What? Well my incoming watch is definitely bigger (AP ROO). The DSSD just does not appeal to me.
__________________
Life is an adventure or nothing at all. |
22 November 2011, 08:39 PM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
Seeing some pics of the DSSD properly sized on a smaller wrist is interesting and I probably underestimated the degree of importance of that. I am also coming from owning a mid-size Omega, so perhaps am not as open to the size as I could be. Won't rush to buy a watch, but increasingly, am looking at something a bit smaller. Lots to think about!! Thanks for the discussion and pics everyone. |
|
22 November 2011, 09:25 PM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,170
|
I could NEVER pull that one off. I have wrists like a teenaged girl.
|
22 November 2011, 11:38 PM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ken
Location: New York, NY
Watch: GS SD GMT
Posts: 389
|
I had a DSSD for over a year and sold it. The size of the watch was not a problem, but I was put off by the small watch face, as compared to the case size, and extra writing which I felt was unnecessary. I also felt that this was a watch that could never be repaired or serviced by anyone other than an RSC. Which I felt was a big inconvenience.
|
23 November 2011, 01:41 AM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Luck
Location: Toronto
Watch: yourself
Posts: 477
|
People with skinny wrists, who can't help it, might fail to pull off a DSSD in some instances, either way, wearing $10k+ on skinny or bloated wrist is full of win.
|
23 November 2011, 02:12 AM | #73 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Let's face it, the DSSD is not a watch that Steve Jobs would have designed and built, nor be seen with! :-)
|
23 November 2011, 05:48 AM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
DSSD
DD II YG/WG/Plat YM II in wg Thats my "size and weight" club. 19.5cm wrist |
27 November 2011, 02:20 AM | #75 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Boston
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
|
|
27 November 2011, 02:27 AM | #76 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
Too tall is debatable in my opinion but when a watch extends from one end of a wrist to another...It's probably too big for that person IN MY OPINION.
Gotta love opinions we can't be wrong on ours! |
27 November 2011, 02:31 AM | #77 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Boston
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 63
|
|
27 November 2011, 02:36 AM | #78 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: America
Watch: Ho
Posts: 368
|
|
27 November 2011, 07:10 AM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 1,125
|
I enjoyed mine as a 'daily wearer'. The additional height did make it prone to the odd knock though!
__________________
Current - DSJC 136660 - Sea-Dweller 126600 |
27 November 2011, 08:08 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maui
Watch: Patek
Posts: 2,032
|
try a milgauss or SD
|
27 November 2011, 08:54 AM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Paul
Location: UK, Dorset
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,636
|
Love this thread, didnt someone famous say that opinions are like A$$holes, everyone has one
Here is my take on the Deepsea, a lot of long term Rolex owners have struggled with the Deepsea proportions because it is such a departure from the std 40mm format even the latest maxicases have taken a similar beating. Soooo we all love the idea of a bigger style submariner style watch, BUT when we try it on in reality the size is offputting poss almost a little freakish. So we flip it and get something else. A lot of guys who have migrated from the 46mm club, Omega, TAG, Breitling and AP spring to mind, seem to take to the heft of the SDDS a lot easier. Maybe if Rolex had a track record or selling beefier (for lack of a better word) models in the past, the SDDS would be an easier model to accomodate to the 40mm guys. I have tried one on with 7" wrists and loved it. Definately a weekend boozer having fun type of watch for me, will leave the 40mm's for the office Just my 2 cents
__________________
Rolex Sub 1680, Rolex GMT 116710LN, Rolex Datejust 16220 Salmon Dial (the Mrs), Tudor BB58, Tudor Pelagos Blue and Several Seiko's ************************************************** ***************** "last one in the chopper is a rotten egg" Jonathan Quayle Higgins III |
27 November 2011, 08:59 AM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
This is exactly why Rolex makes a couple of different styles. This no one watch that everybody agrees on.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
27 April 2012, 07:45 AM | #83 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: Midwest
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 191
|
Quote:
|
|
27 April 2012, 08:33 AM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
|
I'm a huge guy, 6'8", 350 lbs. size 17 feet with hands/wrists to match. Been called "Sasquatch" more than once. Chewbacca too. :)
I've been pretty happy with my Sub C. I'll admit, I see and try on Deepseas when I get the chance, and I find it interesting, and oddly compelling, if anybody can "pull it off", it's me, and I start to consider getting one, but then I put my Sub back on, and feel like I just don't need the Deepsea. As others say, it's not the 44mm size but rather the height. I did a little research, my Panerai Submersible is only 2mm less tall, but on the wrist it looks way flatter/thinner. My theory is, the height of the watch head of the Deepsea is accentuated by the relatively flat, and not very wide bracelet. it almost thrusts the head up, whereas with a still very thick Panerai, the much thicker (higher), and wider straps sort of cover and hide some of the watch head's height. This makes the Pam seem thinner and less obviously tall than the Deepsea. I'd bet, if you put a thick leather strap on a Deepsea, it wouldn't look quite as tall/thick. |
27 April 2012, 08:38 AM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
Ditto, my wrists are 6.5" and the DSSD is unfortunately way too big for me! Also the AP ROO are too big, and even the normal AP RO Jumbo is ever so slightly too big with the lugs / bracelet not being able to wrap around my wrist perfectly. Panerai's also a little too big for my taste :-((((
I've a sold gold Daytona, it's got the weight, but its relatively slim and Rolex bracelets are always so comfortable ... |
27 April 2012, 08:48 AM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Stu
Location: England
Watch: Rolex Datejust
Posts: 63
|
I am beguiled by this watch & constantly go back and forth on whether or not to pull the trigger. Right now, I'd happily swap my GMTIIc for a DSSD but just fearful that the novelty will wear off and the hit will be larger than say a Sub C given the love/hate relationship we have with this behemoth.
|
27 April 2012, 09:09 AM | #87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
|
To the Deepsea fans: The Sub C gets nearly as much bashing, due to the fatter lugs, and blocky, abrupt lug to bracelet transition. The ceramic bezel and squared crown guards draw criticism too, so you're not alone! :)
|
27 April 2012, 09:14 AM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
|
same problem here. my wrist is just about 7 and i think that its a smidge too big for me. actually the dial size with the lugs are fine but the thickness is what ruins it for me. it sits too high on my wrist.
like others have said the subc is an amazing watch and should fit you perfectly. |
27 April 2012, 09:37 AM | #89 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
Quote:
Found it: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...t=DSSD+leather Pic courtesy of PSV: |
|
27 April 2012, 09:41 AM | #90 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.