The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 November 2011, 07:59 AM   #61
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
But as much as I nag about the Deepsea, I do think it is a piece of superlative engineering and there sure is something mysteriously special about it. It is totally a love/hate thing, I painfully admit that I've owned this watch multiple times and there might be more! :-)

I don't think people here are DSSD-haters as much as there are certain people (I might be one of them...) who generally don't like over-sized watches, and the DSSD is pretty much the only one in the Rolex camp, so there is where the critique land!
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2011, 08:07 AM   #62
cgjane
"TRF" Member
 
cgjane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston
Watch: 116509 BlackArabic
Posts: 1,176
I tried to love it, couldnt get past how "funny" it looked on my wrists.

It just doesnt sing to me.
__________________
Life is an adventure or nothing at all.
cgjane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2011, 08:10 AM   #63
CEG
"TRF" Member
 
CEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Dan
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: 116505
Posts: 1,587
Well I CAN'T WAIT to get mine this week, and I haven't got huge wrists!
__________________
16710-116505-116660-116680-116610LV-216570-126331-116710-114060-126621-TudorGMT-Tudor BB58-Sapphire Speedy Pro-Speedy Rising Sun

CEG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2011, 08:25 AM   #64
horseco
"TRF" Member
 
horseco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
I don't think people here are DSSD-haters as much as there are certain people (I might be one of them...) who generally don't like over-sized watches, and the DSSD is pretty much the only one in the Rolex camp, so there is where the critique lands!
This explains my feeling almost exactly...
horseco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2011, 10:16 AM   #65
HDHNTER
"TRF" Member
 
HDHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by SigPig94 View Post
Yeah, I still don't get the "big guy-little watch" thing so I can empathize.


.....and on and on we go............

HDHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2011, 10:42 AM   #66
michaelt
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NY
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgjane View Post
I tried to love it, couldnt get past how "funny" it looked on my wrists.

It just doesnt sing to me.
Well there are Alto's and there are Tenors. Sounds like there are a lot of Alto singers out there with small wrists. Just saying.
It's definitively a tenors watch.
michaelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2011, 10:52 AM   #67
threemonkeys
"TRF" Member
 
threemonkeys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Craig
Location: Seattle-ish, USA
Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc
Posts: 7,022
It's a serious piece of equipment. For me the issue was the height. My wrists are only 6.25" and I looked like a little man in a big suit when I tried it on.

I get the big guy wearing a big watch thing. I just don't understand all the regular Joes into the big is better craze. Big Humvee, DSSD, triple patty burger...whatever.

Not bashing the watch, though, as different opinions make the world an interesting place.
threemonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2011, 11:11 AM   #68
cgjane
"TRF" Member
 
cgjane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston
Watch: 116509 BlackArabic
Posts: 1,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelt View Post
Well there are Alto's and there are Tenors. Sounds like there are a lot of Alto singers out there with small wrists. Just saying.
It's definitively a tenors watch.
What? Well my incoming watch is definitely bigger (AP ROO). The DSSD just does not appeal to me.
__________________
Life is an adventure or nothing at all.
cgjane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2011, 08:39 PM   #69
Rolex Quest 2011
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by SigPig94 View Post
OK OK OK let me get this straight........
1) Some people with a small wrist do not want to buy a DSSD.
2) Some people with a large wrist do not want to buy the DSSD.
3) Some people with a small wrist do want to buy the DSSD.
4) Some people with a large wrist do want to buy the DSSD.

Freedom of choice can be so enlightening! Power to the people!!!!!!
You've chipped in now several times to signal your exasperation that people might want to exchange different opinions on a Rolex watch on a Rolex watch forum. I don't get it? Either you find this stupid / boring and shouldn't bother reading or you could join in with an actual contribution. But just slagging off the discussions seems utterly pointless?

Seeing some pics of the DSSD properly sized on a smaller wrist is interesting and I probably underestimated the degree of importance of that. I am also coming from owning a mid-size Omega, so perhaps am not as open to the size as I could be. Won't rush to buy a watch, but increasingly, am looking at something a bit smaller. Lots to think about!! Thanks for the discussion and pics everyone.
Rolex Quest 2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2011, 09:25 PM   #70
Dilemma
"TRF" Member
 
Dilemma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,170
I could NEVER pull that one off. I have wrists like a teenaged girl.
Dilemma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2011, 11:38 PM   #71
kmleffler
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ken
Location: New York, NY
Watch: GS SD GMT
Posts: 389
I had a DSSD for over a year and sold it. The size of the watch was not a problem, but I was put off by the small watch face, as compared to the case size, and extra writing which I felt was unnecessary. I also felt that this was a watch that could never be repaired or serviced by anyone other than an RSC. Which I felt was a big inconvenience.
kmleffler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2011, 01:41 AM   #72
novan3
"TRF" Member
 
novan3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Luck
Location: Toronto
Watch: yourself
Posts: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYC6 View Post
A bigger watch dont make a bigger man. In fact, often quite the opposite is the case. As often displayed by skinny little wrists struggling to pull it off. Fail.
People with skinny wrists, who can't help it, might fail to pull off a DSSD in some instances, either way, wearing $10k+ on skinny or bloated wrist is full of win.
novan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2011, 02:12 AM   #73
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Let's face it, the DSSD is not a watch that Steve Jobs would have designed and built, nor be seen with! :-)
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2011, 05:48 AM   #74
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
DSSD
DD II YG/WG/Plat
YM II in wg

Thats my "size and weight" club.

19.5cm wrist
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2011, 02:20 AM   #75
SigPig94
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Boston
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex Quest 2011 View Post
You've chipped in now several times to signal your exasperation that people might want to exchange different opinions on a Rolex watch on a Rolex watch forum. I don't get it? Either you find this stupid / boring and shouldn't bother reading or you could join in with an actual contribution. But just slagging off the discussions seems utterly pointless?

Seeing some pics of the DSSD properly sized on a smaller wrist is interesting and I probably underestimated the degree of importance of that. I am also coming from owning a mid-size Omega, so perhaps am not as open to the size as I could be. Won't rush to buy a watch, but increasingly, am looking at something a bit smaller. Lots to think about!! Thanks for the discussion and pics everyone.
And I'll most likely "chip in" a few more times too. You said it yourself, it's a Rolex watch forum. I actually think you DO "get it" so deal with everyone's responses or pass over the posters you're sick of. "Slagging off", as you so eloquently put it, is the basis of any discussion board so try not to take things personal.
SigPig94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2011, 02:27 AM   #76
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Too tall is debatable in my opinion but when a watch extends from one end of a wrist to another...It's probably too big for that person IN MY OPINION.

Gotta love opinions we can't be wrong on ours!
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2011, 02:31 AM   #77
SigPig94
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Boston
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
Too tall is debatable in my opinion but when a watch extends from one end of a wrist to another...It's probably too big for that person IN MY OPINION.

Gotta love opinions we can't be wrong on ours!
Well said.
SigPig94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2011, 02:36 AM   #78
Yeager
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: America
Watch: Ho
Posts: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilemma View Post
I could NEVER pull that one off. I have wrists like a teenaged girl.


Before I acquired an additional 25lbs over the last 2 years, my wrists were so small I have to remove a permanent link from an oyster bracelet.
Yeager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2011, 07:10 AM   #79
RJC
"TRF" Member
 
RJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 1,125
I enjoyed mine as a 'daily wearer'. The additional height did make it prone to the odd knock though!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0651-1.jpg (76.5 KB, 453 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0652-1.jpg (74.1 KB, 452 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0653-1.jpg (59.7 KB, 453 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0654-1.jpg (84.3 KB, 456 views)
__________________


Current - DSJC 136660 - Sea-Dweller 126600
RJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2011, 08:08 AM   #80
gregmoeck
"TRF" Member
 
gregmoeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maui
Watch: Patek
Posts: 2,032
try a milgauss or SD
gregmoeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2011, 08:54 AM   #81
BH13GMT
"TRF" Member
 
BH13GMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Paul
Location: UK, Dorset
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,636
Love this thread, didnt someone famous say that opinions are like A$$holes, everyone has one

Here is my take on the Deepsea, a lot of long term Rolex owners have struggled with the Deepsea proportions because it is such a departure from the std 40mm format even the latest maxicases have taken a similar beating. Soooo we all love the idea of a bigger style submariner style watch, BUT when we try it on in reality the size is offputting poss almost a little freakish. So we flip it and get something else. A lot of guys who have migrated from the 46mm club, Omega, TAG, Breitling and AP spring to mind, seem to take to the heft of the SDDS a lot easier. Maybe if Rolex had a track record or selling beefier (for lack of a better word) models in the past, the SDDS would be an easier model to accomodate to the 40mm guys.
I have tried one on with 7" wrists and loved it. Definately a weekend boozer having fun type of watch for me, will leave the 40mm's for the office

Just my 2 cents
__________________

Rolex Sub 1680, Rolex GMT 116710LN, Rolex Datejust 16220 Salmon Dial (the Mrs), Tudor BB58, Tudor Pelagos Blue and Several Seiko's
************************************************** *****************
"last one in the chopper is a rotten egg" Jonathan Quayle Higgins III
BH13GMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2011, 08:59 AM   #82
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
This is exactly why Rolex makes a couple of different styles. This no one watch that everybody agrees on.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2012, 07:45 AM   #83
CLRBLULITE
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: Midwest
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelt View Post
I really don't get it it is pretty simple. The DSSD is a Sub on steroids. It is like there are two versions of the Sub. There are many other Rolex watches that wear like a bracelet. Not that a bracelet is bad. I personally like a chunk of Rolex on my wrist that shouts out a little. There are so many other brands that are larger. Hubolt, Breitling, U Boat, for example. This is the biggest baddest watch, that Rolex makes. OK the YM II is big, but not bad.
So you have the DSSD and...... every other Rolex. Either/Or you can't go wrong. Just saying.
Completely agree! I think the DSSD and the Milgauss are drawing many customers that Rolex wouldn't otherwise receive. I like the "shout" plus the quality of a Rolex. IMO, Rolex will need to continue to please both sides.....and offer non-conservative styles, along with the traditional.
CLRBLULITE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2012, 08:33 AM   #84
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
I'm a huge guy, 6'8", 350 lbs. size 17 feet with hands/wrists to match. Been called "Sasquatch" more than once. Chewbacca too. :)

I've been pretty happy with my Sub C.

I'll admit, I see and try on Deepseas when I get the chance, and I find it interesting, and oddly compelling, if anybody can "pull it off", it's me, and I start to consider getting one, but then I put my Sub back on, and feel like I just don't need the Deepsea. As others say, it's not the 44mm size but rather the height.

I did a little research, my Panerai Submersible is only 2mm less tall, but on the wrist it looks way flatter/thinner. My theory is, the height of the watch head of the Deepsea is accentuated by the relatively flat, and not very wide bracelet. it almost thrusts the head up, whereas with a still very thick Panerai, the much thicker (higher), and wider straps sort of cover and hide some of the watch head's height. This makes the Pam seem thinner and less obviously tall than the Deepsea. I'd bet, if you put a thick leather strap on a Deepsea, it wouldn't look quite as tall/thick.
Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2012, 08:38 AM   #85
caryyee
"TRF" Member
 
caryyee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
Ditto, my wrists are 6.5" and the DSSD is unfortunately way too big for me! Also the AP ROO are too big, and even the normal AP RO Jumbo is ever so slightly too big with the lugs / bracelet not being able to wrap around my wrist perfectly. Panerai's also a little too big for my taste :-((((
I've a sold gold Daytona, it's got the weight, but its relatively slim and Rolex bracelets are always so comfortable ...
caryyee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2012, 08:48 AM   #86
Keats
"TRF" Member
 
Keats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Stu
Location: England
Watch: Rolex Datejust
Posts: 63
I am beguiled by this watch & constantly go back and forth on whether or not to pull the trigger. Right now, I'd happily swap my GMTIIc for a DSSD but just fearful that the novelty will wear off and the hit will be larger than say a Sub C given the love/hate relationship we have with this behemoth.
Keats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2012, 09:09 AM   #87
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
To the Deepsea fans: The Sub C gets nearly as much bashing, due to the fatter lugs, and blocky, abrupt lug to bracelet transition. The ceramic bezel and squared crown guards draw criticism too, so you're not alone! :)
Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2012, 09:14 AM   #88
boogiebot
"TRF" Member
 
boogiebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
same problem here. my wrist is just about 7 and i think that its a smidge too big for me. actually the dial size with the lugs are fine but the thickness is what ruins it for me. it sits too high on my wrist.

like others have said the subc is an amazing watch and should fit you perfectly.
boogiebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2012, 09:37 AM   #89
HDHNTER
"TRF" Member
 
HDHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Megalobyte View Post
I'm a huge guy, 6'8", 350 lbs. size 17 feet with hands/wrists to match. Been called "Sasquatch" more than once. Chewbacca too. :)

I've been pretty happy with my Sub C.

I'll admit, I see and try on Deepseas when I get the chance, and I find it interesting, and oddly compelling, if anybody can "pull it off", it's me, and I start to consider getting one, but then I put my Sub back on, and feel like I just don't need the Deepsea. As others say, it's not the 44mm size but rather the height.

I did a little research, my Panerai Submersible is only 2mm less tall, but on the wrist it looks way flatter/thinner. My theory is, the height of the watch head of the Deepsea is accentuated by the relatively flat, and not very wide bracelet. it almost thrusts the head up, whereas with a still very thick Panerai, the much thicker (higher), and wider straps sort of cover and hide some of the watch head's height. This makes the Pam seem thinner and less obviously tall than the Deepsea. I'd bet, if you put a thick leather strap on a Deepsea, it wouldn't look quite as tall/thick.
Yep, a member here posted a pic of their DSSD on a nice thick strap a few weeks back. That was the first time the DSSD has ever looked good to me.

Found it: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...t=DSSD+leather

Pic courtesy of PSV:
HDHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2012, 09:41 AM   #90
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDHNTER View Post
Yep, a member here posted a pic of their DSSD on a nice thick strap a few weeks back. That was the first time the DSSD has ever looked good to me.
Don't know if this is the pic you're speaking of, but I found it on Google. I think the Deepsea never looked so svelte. :)

Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.