ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 April 2014, 03:36 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PA
Watch: SubLV, 1665 Rail
Posts: 1,054
|
I love the classic LV! Keep that one. Besides, the LVC is so ubiquitous, you could pick up another in the future without much difficulty. Good luck with your decision
__________________
|
4 April 2014, 01:38 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
|
4 April 2014, 02:13 PM | #63 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Reno
Posts: 1,028
|
Keep the LV elegant option in my book...
|
4 April 2014, 04:33 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
|
I was contemplating the purchase of a Sub for many years. I finally pulled the trigger on a Sub C Date when I luckily came across an available piece whilst travelling at a duty free store. It was the new updates bracelet, case, dial, ceramic bezel that made me have to have it. I've seen both the LV and hulk, the LV looks very dull and boring in comparison to the Hulk. Plus, the LV looks somewhat dated.
A good friend of mine recently sold his LV and kept his Sub C (not Hulk). The new Subs are superior in every way IMHO. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.