The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 May 2015, 01:19 PM   #61
Heo2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: new england
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
Chaps

Strictly speaking one does not wear a wrist watch at formal occassions where black or white tie is the dress code.

You either wear a pocket watch or no watch at all.
I'm throwing the BS flag. As a grandson of a tailor and one who has never been acused of being improperly dressed for any occasion, I never heard that before.

We all know what is and is not a dress watch but the Rolex Sub has crept into the dress watch status due to pop culture. And this is not a bad thing for fans of the Sub.
Heo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2015, 06:55 PM   #62
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Cascarrabias View Post
Mick, my left wrist is not tanned under my watch. Exposing it looks . . . well nekkid!
May I suggest that you purchase a mini sun lamp.
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2015, 07:46 PM   #63
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Great looking watch, but no, it's not formal..
+1 in my books
Muzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2015, 07:50 PM   #64
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
Looks like a great match!
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2015, 10:53 PM   #65
Touring
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Touring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hoth
Posts: 1,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heo2 View Post
I'm throwing the BS flag. As a grandson of a tailor and one who has never been acused of being improperly dressed for any occasion, I never heard that before.

We all know what is and is not a dress watch but the Rolex Sub has crept into the dress watch status due to pop culture. And this is not a bad thing for fans of the Sub.
Sorry, but Mick P is correct. When in formal wear (e.g. white tie, morning dress), the convention is not to wear a time piece on the wrist; pocket watches are acceptable. Even in semi-formal wear (e.g. black tie), the same applies,

A suit is casual - not formal or semi-formal - so wear whatever you want, whether it'd be a Timex, Sub, or Patek.
Touring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2015, 11:05 PM   #66
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Touring View Post
Sorry, but Mick P is correct. When in formal wear (e.g. white tie, morning dress), the convention is not to wear a time piece on the wrist; pocket watches are acceptable. Even in semi-formal wear (e.g. black tie), the same applies,

A suit is casual - not formal or semi-formal - so wear whatever you want, whether it'd be a Timex, Sub, or Patek.
Indeed, the lounge suit derives from Edwardian weekend wear. It was the Duke of Windsor who, as Prince of Wales, made them acceptable for daily wear.
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2015, 11:15 PM   #67
gerryb92
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 68
Lots of cringe in this thread.
gerryb92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 04:02 AM   #68
Mak2013
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Rolex 14060M
Posts: 681
in America...anything goes. No worries there.

Any where else in the world, particularly Europe, it would be very vulgar to wear large and heavy diver watch on your wrist with a black tie dress code.

People would think of you.....as a doucbebag pretty much.

That's why I love America...No body gives a crap. Its not known to be an example of style and fashion.
You could wear a clock around your neck like Flava Flave, and no one would pay attention to you .
Mak2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 04:10 AM   #69
CabbageHead
"TRF" Member
 
CabbageHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 369
Does this mean that the tuxedo dial Datejust is the ROLEX equivalent of a tuxedo t-shirt?
CabbageHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 04:48 AM   #70
AzHadEnuf
"TRF" Member
 
AzHadEnuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Ralph
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Watch: 6263,DJ,SUB,BB,THR
Posts: 2,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mak2013 View Post
in America...anything goes. No worries there.

Any where else in the world, particularly Europe, it would be very vulgar to wear large and heavy diver watch on your wrist with a black tie dress code.

People would think of you.....as a doucbebag pretty much.

That's why I love America...No body gives a crap. Its not known to be an example of style and fashion.
You could wear a clock around your neck like Flava Flave, and no one would pay attention to you .


Again, it has nothing to do with style and fashion. It's about bad etiquette and poor manners. It's not about tuxedos and dive watches. It's about wearing any watch with a tux, be it a PP,AP,ALS all with gold cases and shinny black leather straps, it's about not wearing a watch with a tux.

For those who argue that good etiquette is old fashion and no longer applies, please enjoy your next formal, black tie event, while your wife is picking her nose and farting at the dinner table. Thank god we are in America and no one will give a crap.
__________________
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." -A. Einstein
AzHadEnuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 05:18 AM   #71
Heo2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: new england
Posts: 108
Formal wear or work wear. What could be more passe than a pocket watch.
Heo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 05:25 AM   #72
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
An automatic wrist watch?
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 07:24 AM   #73
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
Considering the Prince wears his Omega with a tux, and I never plan on being more formal than royalty, I think I'd be fine wearing my Sub with just about anything.

douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 07:58 AM   #74
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
Considering the Prince wears his Omega with a tux, and I never plan on being more formal than royalty, I think I'd be fine wearing my Sub with just about anything.

It's a flaunting of the rules that is okay in his case because of the sentimental value and the fact that he is otherwise impeccably dressed, like Gianni Agnelli's PloProf in that respect.
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 09:56 AM   #75
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scholar View Post
It's a flaunting of the rules that is okay in his case because of the sentimental value and the fact that he is otherwise impeccably dressed, like Gianni Agnelli's PloProf in that respect.
Prince Harry also does it with a less sentimental Explorer II Polar, and, of course, zillions of non-royal celebrities do it, too. I won't speak to white tie, but a Rolex with black tie has certainly become socially acceptable, IMO.

douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 09:58 AM   #76
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,996
Nice.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 10:05 AM   #77
busytimmy
"TRF" Member
 
busytimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
Great thread doe
busytimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 10:24 AM   #78
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
I love that while bouncing forth between this forum and a tech blog, I just figured out the perfect companion for a Rolex. The Suitsy!

https://www.betabrand.com/mens-busin...ie-hybrid.html
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 10:57 AM   #79
Heo2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: new england
Posts: 108
Thanks for posting pix of the princes. I feel vindicated...and properly dressed
Heo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 11:02 AM   #80
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heo2 View Post
Thanks for posting pix of the princes. I feel vindicated...and properly dressed
It looks like their father has a watch on under his cuff that is of decent thickness, but I'm not sure what it is.




edit: Actually, it's likely the 40mm Chopard L.U.C. Tonneau Prince Charles XL, which is a dressier watch.

douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 12:09 PM   #81
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
Prince Harry also does it with a less sentimental Explorer II Polar, and, of course, zillions of non-royal celebrities do it, too. I won't speak to white tie, but a Rolex with black tie has certainly become socially acceptable, IMO.

In a photo with an unbuttoned double-breasted dinner jacket, so the watch isn't the only tradition being flaunted.

In any case, flexibility with these things is certainly there. All I'm saying is that the SD (though the sleekest current Sub) is not formal, per se.
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 12:15 PM   #82
domrusso10
"TRF" Member
 
domrusso10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: new york
Watch: 116334 & 116610
Posts: 1,310
Very nice


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
domrusso10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 12:35 PM   #83
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scholar View Post
It's a flaunting of the rules that is okay in his case because of the sentimental value and the fact that he is otherwise impeccably dressed, like Gianni Agnelli's PloProf in that respect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scholar View Post
In a photo with an unbuttoned double-breasted dinner jacket, so the watch isn't the only tradition being flaunted.

In any case, flexibility with these things is certainly there. All I'm saying is that the SD (though the sleekest current Sub) is not formal, per se.
It's flout, not flaunt. A common error
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 12:48 PM   #84
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
It's flout, not flaunt. A common error
Indeed– flaunting being quite the opposite! My phone's doing, in this case, but I ought to double check next time.
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 12:51 PM   #85
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scholar View Post
Indeed– flaunting being quite the opposite! My phone's doing, in this case, but I ought to double check next time.
It's funny, here on TRF, one is positively encouraged, while the other can get you banned.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 12:52 PM   #86
Trouble15
"TRF" Member
 
Trouble15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by superdog View Post
Nobody



Looking good!
Trouble15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 01:33 PM   #87
CabbageHead
"TRF" Member
 
CabbageHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scholar View Post
... and the fact that he is otherwise impeccably dressed...
Disagree.



The jacket collar is off, even if the argument is that he his shrugging his shoulders. The sleeves of either the jacket, or the shirt, or both are wrong. A bespoke shirt shouldn't bunch and wrinkle that much either.

I looked at the other photos from this event and they confirm this. Other photos of him in a tuxedo usually show better fitting jackets, although the sleeves are often long and not fitted. I'll chalk it up to an off night. Must have.. borrowed it? errr??
CabbageHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 01:50 PM   #88
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by CabbageHead View Post
Disagree.



The jacket collar is off, even if the argument is that he his shrugging his shoulders. The sleeves of either the jacket, or the shirt, or both are wrong. A bespoke shirt shouldn't bunch and wrinkle that much either.

I looked at the other photos from this event and they confirm this. Other photos of him in a tuxedo usually show better fitting jackets, although the sleeves are often long and not fitted. I'll chalk it up to an off night. Must have.. borrowed it? errr??
I'm speaking of his wardrobe more generally, hence the comparison with Gianni Agnelli.

That dinner jacket is definitely disastrous– some sort of borrowed thing does seem likely, considering that though unfortunately he is not in bespoke as often as he should be, his usual dinner jackets certainly are and his non-bespoke items are made to measure from Turnbull and Asser, which ought to fit better than that.
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 02:00 PM   #89
CabbageHead
"TRF" Member
 
CabbageHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scholar View Post
I'm speaking of his wardrobe more generally, hence the comparison with Gianni Agnelli.

That dinner jacket is definitely disastrous– some sort of borrowed thing does seem likely, considering that though unfortunately he is not in bespoke as often as he should be, his usual dinner jackets certainly are and his non-bespoke items are made to measure from Turnbull and Asser, which ought to fit better than that.
CabbageHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2015, 06:06 PM   #90
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Chaps

It is a long held tradition that the Heirs to the English throne are expected to flout tradition and etiquette in order to set the style for their own reign.

It is perfectly acceptable to wear a slim gold watch with a strap as shown by Prince Charles. His two sons are pushing the boundaries even further but the golden rule remains that their loyal subjects still conform to the dress conventions whilst the Heir Apparent flouts it.

So to repeat, if you wish to be "one of the boys" or "in the club", you only wear either no watch, a pocket watch or a slim gold watch with a shiny black strap if you are invited to a truly formal event after 6.00pm.

Those are the unwritten rules and a gentleman is expected to silently comply. If you break the rule, nothing will be said but you are unlikely to receive another invitation because you "are not one of us"

So the SD4 stays home whilst the Duke of Cambridge wears his Omega and Prince Harry wears his Explorer 2.

Regards

Mick
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.