ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Toony · 30 March 2016, 06:50 AM

I say no. The 116619 is a beauty. I love it. The 116655 is an awesome watch and its on my radar. But not to replace the 116619.

bppog · 30 March 2016, 06:51 AM

I love rubber straps on watches think they make the watch look very sporty.

Was interested in the Ym rg but when i tried it on thought it looked very dull with the matt black finish and for that money would rather own an Ap.

There was big waiting lists for this watch but i don't think it is selling well.

A local dealer told me he had twenty people on the waiting list but everybody that tried the watch did not want it.

shoe-bop · 30 March 2016, 06:53 AM

I would not make that trade!

Tri-Tip · 30 March 2016, 06:55 AM

Keep the Smurf (or just give it to me!)

Al1969 · 30 March 2016, 07:06 AM

I wouldn't trade some gold for ALL gold.

Robrob777 · 30 March 2016, 07:26 AM

Such a beautiful piece the smurf. If anything i would go for the yellow gold blue sub. That rose gold looks awesome too and certainly is something different for you.

ickkey · 30 March 2016, 07:34 AM

Come on Sam, join the club!

I might be bias though, but not a fan of cartoon blue.........

japenney · 30 March 2016, 07:40 AM

I do not like Rose gold. It seems a bit of a Fad to me and a bit Feminine. I also do not like the Yacht master watch in general. The Smurf is beautiful imo. This is all my opinion please do not take offence.

rory · 30 March 2016, 08:10 AM

im struggling to wear any watch without the glide lock now

busytimmy · 30 March 2016, 08:14 AM

No way would I make that trade

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

gummy · 30 March 2016, 08:51 AM

WG Sub for me...

The interaction of the lugs and rubber band just kill the YM for me.

Tebow15 · 30 March 2016, 08:54 AM

Keep ALL GOLD!!!!

Hello!!!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ap1 · 30 March 2016, 09:04 AM

Look, people are saying financially it doesn't make sense, same price used for rubber vs. all gold. That is technically correct. But who can be technical in this hobby of emotional choices. I pick the ym case/dial vs. the blue. I owned a smurf and the blue was too much for me to like in bright or outdoor lighting. I'm on board if you want to make this switch. Your wrist, not anyone's here.

Starguru · 30 March 2016, 10:15 AM

I don't own either of these, or even a Rolex, but I will give you my thoughts:

1. The Smurf looks spectacular in photos. I've seen/held one a bunch of times, and in person I haven't been as impressed. Something about that blue doesn't tickle me the right way, in person.

2. I think the Yachtmaster looks spectacular in person. The color of the rose gold and the matte finish on the bezel really work together, for me.

3. Aren't the two comparable in price? I thought they are both about 25k. Practically speaking, I think the YM is way too pricey for what you get. I personally might be interested in picking one up pre-owned.

They are both fantastic. There are no wrong choices here, just choices.

Hodog16 · 30 March 2016, 10:39 AM

I would not do it personally, but the only watch I could understand trading the 116619 for is the platinum Daytona.

If Rolex ever releases a platinum sub that would be the pinnacle in my opinion.

05carbondrz · 30 March 2016, 10:40 AM

You are just going to lose Money flipping everything all the Time.The Dealers will love You though!!

brandrea · 30 March 2016, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brettpaul

Walk it off mate....keep the smurf!

zion_rasta · 30 March 2016, 10:54 AM

Do me a favor. Before you sell the smurf, get an Everest rubber and and install it.

Get a good feel for it, wear it for a month and then decide.

Ok just keep the damn Smurf ok. Don't sell!

Sublover2166 · 30 March 2016, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 05carbondrz

You are just going to lose Money flipping everything all the Time.The Dealers will love You though!!

Seriously, every time the OP starts a thread, it is always about the same thing. He is not happy with what is on his wrist and is chirping like "Flipper". SMH

Daytona88 · 30 March 2016, 10:58 AM

I would not do it, especially since you still love the smurf.

Jason71 · 30 March 2016, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tkerrmd

WOW I would never do that in a million years of being on TRF!!!!

Wow Tom......tell us how you REALLY feel.

(Agree 100% though.

)

J!m · 30 March 2016, 11:37 AM

Sorry- I read that and thought: flipping the bird?

That son-of-a-smurf cut me off! Smurf you buddy!

blue lion · 30 March 2016, 12:26 PM

It's your choice, not ours. But I would never make that switch.

Brian Page · 30 March 2016, 12:41 PM

No, I would never do this. Think long and hard on this one..

LuminousMaximus · 31 March 2016, 02:04 AM

Thanks for all your responses! Some of them were particularly funny, and let me tell you I feel the same way about it sometimes. It is a battle within my self and I'll tell you what I think.

I think it stems from Rolex being the first watch I have spent so much money on...I come from limited means, and to spend so much on a watch, I mean even the Sea-Dweller That I have, which is also a Ton of money, is just unthinkable.

I have been wearing both and thoroughly enjoy it!, I think I look for reasons to sell or flip, but really deep down, I don't want to. I think I should sell it and put the money in the bank and save save save...you know for a rainy day.

I love the Smurf. It is subtle indoors, and bright and awesome outdoors. It really has so many different personalities. It truly is an amazing piece. i can do a whole thread on it!

I thought initially, I would trade both the 116619 and the 116600 for the RG YM, and then I could have just one sporty watch, but almost all of you were right. That rubber band does not support it's 20K asking price. I mean just look at the 16622. 5-6k is what they are going for, and they were like 12k at the AD. Also, the rubber strap doesn't fill in the end-link area. That really bugs me for whatever reason they did it for. I still may add a RG YM, but at around $13k...lol

I will have to still battle myself until I am able to wear nice watches without worry. Thanks for being the Big Brother...

VicLeChic · 31 March 2016, 07:45 AM

Coming from someone who owns the 116622 (YM Rolesium), loves the RG YM and was taken aback by the bold move from Rolex at Baselworld with the 2 new gorgeous YMs (I'm a YM fan in case you didn't notice), I would not get rid of the Smurf.

The Smurf is above the RG YM in terms of sheer iconic presence. I suspect that when the RG YM novelty wears off, you'll realise how irreplaceable and timeless the Smurf is. It's in a different league. It's a classic.

Not to mention that the RG YM lacks a proper RG strap.

The RG YM is a fashionista's watch. The Smurf is a connoisseur's timepiece.

Can you not trade any other piece but the Smurf?

VicLeChic · 31 March 2016, 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hodog16

I would not do it personally, but the only watch I could understand trading the 116619 for is the platinum Daytona.

If Rolex ever releases a platinum sub that would be the pinnacle in my opinion.

A Submarinum would be the King of watches, the Platona being the Queen...:-)

Al1969 · 31 March 2016, 07:57 AM

To the OP, I think you made a wise decision. Enjoy wearing that ALL GOLD smurf.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1st amg · 31 March 2016, 08:12 AM

WHEW, we almost lost one to rubber.

dmitrii_ · 31 March 2016, 08:17 AM

Smurf is classic and timeless, rg ym is cool but doesn't really compare. Hold out, maybe flip your ss sea dweller plus cash for the ym.

30 March 2016, 07:06 AM	#65
Al1969 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 6,638	I wouldn't trade some gold for ALL gold. __________________ WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719

30 March 2016, 10:54 AM	#78
zion_rasta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Planet Earth Watch: GMT II ceramic Posts: 1,590	Do me a favor. Before you sell the smurf, get an Everest rubber and and install it. Get a good feel for it, wear it for a month and then decide. Ok just keep the damn Smurf ok. Don't sell! __________________ Sky Dweller WG 326139 GMT II 116710LN Submariner 1680 Sold - Daytona 116523; YM 116622; Datejust 16233

31 March 2016, 02:04 AM	#85
LuminousMaximus 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: USA Watch: me hit Huge Lotto Posts: 6,512	You guys are awesome... Thanks for all your responses! Some of them were particularly funny, and let me tell you I feel the same way about it sometimes. It is a battle within my self and I'll tell you what I think. I think it stems from Rolex being the first watch I have spent so much money on...I come from limited means, and to spend so much on a watch, I mean even the Sea-Dweller That I have, which is also a Ton of money, is just unthinkable. I have been wearing both and thoroughly enjoy it!, I think I look for reasons to sell or flip, but really deep down, I don't want to. I think I should sell it and put the money in the bank and save save save...you know for a rainy day. I love the Smurf. It is subtle indoors, and bright and awesome outdoors. It really has so many different personalities. It truly is an amazing piece. i can do a whole thread on it! I thought initially, I would trade both the 116619 and the 116600 for the RG YM, and then I could have just one sporty watch, but almost all of you were right. That rubber band does not support it's 20K asking price. I mean just look at the 16622. 5-6k is what they are going for, and they were like 12k at the AD. Also, the rubber strap doesn't fill in the end-link area. That really bugs me for whatever reason they did it for. I still may add a RG YM, but at around $13k...lol I will have to still battle myself until I am able to wear nice watches without worry. Thanks for being the Big Brother... __________________ “Every man Dies... Not Every Man, Really Lives.” – William Wallace - To really lives means to live your life to the fullest. It means to chase your dreams, take risks, and to love life. Since everyone’s fate is the same, why not live the best life that you possibly can? In order to really live,you must seize the day. Live each day as if it's your last and overall just do it! Today is a gift, that’s why it’s called the present...

31 March 2016, 07:57 AM	#88
Al1969 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 6,638	To the OP, I think you made a wise decision. Enjoy wearing that ALL GOLD smurf. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719

31 March 2016, 08:17 AM	#90
dmitrii_ "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: dmitrii Location: NYC Posts: 1,724	Smurf is classic and timeless, rg ym is cool but doesn't really compare. Hold out, maybe flip your ss sea dweller plus cash for the ym. __________________ ig: therolexgram

30 March 2016, 06:50 AM	#61
Toony "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Tony Location: Gatchaman Posts: 1,873	I say no. The 116619 is a beauty. I love it. The 116655 is an awesome watch and its on my radar. But not to replace the 116619.

30 March 2016, 06:51 AM	#62
bppog "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: UK Posts: 9	I love rubber straps on watches think they make the watch look very sporty. Was interested in the Ym rg but when i tried it on thought it looked very dull with the matt black finish and for that money would rather own an Ap. There was big waiting lists for this watch but i don't think it is selling well. A local dealer told me he had twenty people on the waiting list but everybody that tried the watch did not want it.

30 March 2016, 06:53 AM	#63
shoe-bop "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Jeff Location: Iowa Posts: 150	I would not make that trade!

30 March 2016, 06:55 AM	#64
Tri-Tip "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: CA, USA Watch: Out!!! Posts: 6,470	Keep the Smurf (or just give it to me!)

30 March 2016, 07:26 AM	#66
Robrob777 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: WA Posts: 272	Such a beautiful piece the smurf. If anything i would go for the yellow gold blue sub. That rose gold looks awesome too and certainly is something different for you.

30 March 2016, 07:34 AM	#67
ickkey "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: -john Z Location: Michigan Watch: the girls..... Posts: 73	Come on Sam, join the club! I might be bias though, but not a fan of cartoon blue.........

30 March 2016, 07:40 AM	#68
japenney "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Josh Location: Canada Watch: undecided Posts: 4,777	I do not like Rose gold. It seems a bit of a Fad to me and a bit Feminine. I also do not like the Yacht master watch in general. The Smurf is beautiful imo. This is all my opinion please do not take offence.

30 March 2016, 08:10 AM	#69
rory "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: leeds uk Posts: 1	im struggling to wear any watch without the glide lock now

30 March 2016, 08:14 AM	#70
busytimmy "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Sydney, Australia Watch: ing the detectives Posts: 3,745	No way would I make that trade Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

30 March 2016, 08:51 AM	#71
gummy 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Thomas Location: Midwest USA Watch: AP PP Rolex Posts: 3,348	WG Sub for me... The interaction of the lugs and rubber band just kill the YM for me.

30 March 2016, 08:54 AM	#72
Tebow15 Banned Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Florida Posts: 1,143	Keep ALL GOLD!!!! Hello!!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

30 March 2016, 09:04 AM	#73
ap1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,508	Look, people are saying financially it doesn't make sense, same price used for rubber vs. all gold. That is technically correct. But who can be technical in this hobby of emotional choices. I pick the ym case/dial vs. the blue. I owned a smurf and the blue was too much for me to like in bright or outdoor lighting. I'm on board if you want to make this switch. Your wrist, not anyone's here.

30 March 2016, 10:15 AM	#74
Starguru "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: VA Posts: 238	I don't own either of these, or even a Rolex, but I will give you my thoughts: 1. The Smurf looks spectacular in photos. I've seen/held one a bunch of times, and in person I haven't been as impressed. Something about that blue doesn't tickle me the right way, in person. 2. I think the Yachtmaster looks spectacular in person. The color of the rose gold and the matte finish on the bezel really work together, for me. 3. Aren't the two comparable in price? I thought they are both about 25k. Practically speaking, I think the YM is way too pricey for what you get. I personally might be interested in picking one up pre-owned. They are both fantastic. There are no wrong choices here, just choices.

30 March 2016, 10:39 AM	#75
Hodog16 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: NC Watch: RG Olive DD40 Posts: 1,791	I would not do it personally, but the only watch I could understand trading the 116619 for is the platinum Daytona. If Rolex ever releases a platinum sub that would be the pinnacle in my opinion.

30 March 2016, 10:40 AM	#76
05carbondrz Banned Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: USA Posts: 2,030	You are just going to lose Money flipping everything all the Time.The Dealers will love You though!!

30 March 2016, 10:58 AM	#80
Daytona88 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: USA Watch: 5712 Posts: 2,612	I would not do it, especially since you still love the smurf.

30 March 2016, 11:37 AM	#82
J!m "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Real Name: Jim Location: Connecticut Watch: this! Hold my beer Posts: 2,839	Sorry- I read that and thought: flipping the bird? That son-of-a-smurf cut me off! Smurf you buddy!

30 March 2016, 12:26 PM	#83
blue lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Florida State! Watch: It's just a watch. Posts: 1,463	It's your choice, not ours. But I would never make that switch.

30 March 2016, 12:41 PM	#84
Brian Page "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: USA Posts: 6,623	No, I would never do this. Think long and hard on this one..

31 March 2016, 07:45 AM	#86
VicLeChic Banned Join Date: Jul 2014 Real Name: Victor Location: Spain Watch: YM 116622 - SD43 Posts: 2,598	Coming from someone who owns the 116622 (YM Rolesium), loves the RG YM and was taken aback by the bold move from Rolex at Baselworld with the 2 new gorgeous YMs (I'm a YM fan in case you didn't notice), I would not get rid of the Smurf. The Smurf is above the RG YM in terms of sheer iconic presence. I suspect that when the RG YM novelty wears off, you'll realise how irreplaceable and timeless the Smurf is. It's in a different league. It's a classic. Not to mention that the RG YM lacks a proper RG strap. The RG YM is a fashionista's watch. The Smurf is a connoisseur's timepiece. Can you not trade any other piece but the Smurf?

31 March 2016, 08:12 AM	#89
1st amg 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: nicholas Location: ottawa canada Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai Posts: 10,352	WHEW, we almost lost one to rubber.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)