The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 September 2016, 03:10 AM   #1
cinch
"TRF" Member
 
cinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: uk
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by kultschar View Post
For the UK guys - do you let your AD handle service / issues or go direct to Patek?
AD's don't service unless your AD is the Bond Street service centre. So it either goes off to Bond Street or back to Geneva.
cinch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2016, 03:17 AM   #2
kultschar
"TRF" Member
 
kultschar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: End of the World
Watch: PP & Rolex
Posts: 1,970
Quote:
Originally Posted by cinch View Post
AD's don't service unless your AD is the Bond Street service centre. So it either goes off to Bond Street or back to Geneva.
Sorry what I meant was do the ADs take it and send off to Patek on your behalf or do you send direct to Patek UK yourselves?
kultschar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2016, 03:28 AM   #3
cinch
"TRF" Member
 
cinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: uk
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by kultschar View Post
Sorry what I meant was do the ADs take it and send off to Patek on your behalf or do you send direct to Patek UK yourselves?
Yes I just take it in to my local AD and they send it to Patek on my behalf
cinch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2016, 03:13 AM   #4
incontrol
"TRF" Member
 
incontrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
In NY, they have started a school for watch making. They have 6 students that met their testing standards prior to accepting them into the school.

Next year will be two years of training and at that time they will be prepared to start working starting at a Level 2.

Their goal is to train about 6 pre- qualified students every two years to get more watch repair techs. Their claim is that there are not many qualified techs running around available for hire therefore they have to create them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Patek Philippe
Rolex
incontrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2016, 10:53 AM   #5
waspy1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
So how long does it take for PPSC to do a pressure test? How much would this cost?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2016, 11:26 AM   #6
Moloch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by waspy1 View Post
So how long does it take for PPSC to do a pressure test? How much would this cost?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You don't need to send it to PPSC for pressure test. Almost any competent watchmaker can do that for you. It should cost you less than a price of a average meal at a restaurant. Or nothing if you have relations with a watchmaker. Another option is check if your local AD have in house watchmaker. They'll likely test it for no charge if you have history of purchasing watches from them. Last option is to just do it yourself by purchasing the testing machine.
Moloch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2016, 07:32 PM   #7
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by waspy1 View Post
So how long does it take for PPSC to do a pressure test? How much would this cost?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
PT test is a 3 minutes job , they make a low pressure and a high pressure check in a dry tester to see if there s any leak , the thing is that sometimes the high PT passed 8since the pressure push the part together stronger - but the low pressure test fails.PT isn t a problem to any competent watchmaker however to make any work on the watch it does ,so I d stick to your original plan and send it to PP , if they considering the fault origin structural or manufacturing you may have luck and get the service cleaning complimentary.
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2016, 07:52 PM   #8
waspy1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passionata View Post
PT test is a 3 minutes job , they make a low pressure and a high pressure check in a dry tester to see if there s any leak , the thing is that sometimes the high PT passed 8since the pressure push the part together stronger - but the low pressure test fails.PT isn t a problem to any competent watchmaker however to make any work on the watch it does ,so I d stick to your original plan and send it to PP , if they considering the fault origin structural or manufacturing you may have luck and get the service cleaning complimentary.


Thanks for the explanation. The watch is with KL AD now. They will forward to PPSC in Singapore. I'll be sure to post a follow up. I've already been in touch with the PPSC so they are expecting it and know the history.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2016, 07:09 PM   #9
waspy1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
Moisture ingress to 5711

Here's the update following receipt and assessment by the PPSC:

Diagnosis:

Slight oxidization in movement
Circuit and Coil oxidized.
Gaskets deteriorated
Dial indexes discolored
Case and caseback are scratched and dented, signs of attrition.
Bracelet and buckle scratched.
A complete service is recommended.

Water Resistance: a watch’s water-resistance cannot be permanently guaranteed. It may notably be affected by the ageing of gaskets (rubber seals) or by an accidental shock to crown(not for your case). we recommend you have the Water Resistance of your timepiece checked once a year by an authorised Service Centre, preferably before the swimming activity.


The assessment confirms that the moisture ingress is from gasket deterioration. The watch is less than 4 years old. Is this even half way reasonable? The service is fully chargeable according to the PPSC. Any thoughts?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2016, 08:35 PM   #10
josephashburnnn
"TRF" Member
 
josephashburnnn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Watchaland
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by waspy1 View Post
Here's the update following receipt and assessment by the PPSC:

Diagnosis:

Slight oxidization in movement
Circuit and Coil oxidized.
Gaskets deteriorated
Dial indexes discolored
Case and caseback are scratched and dented, signs of attrition.
Bracelet and buckle scratched.
A complete service is recommended.

Water Resistance: a watch’s water-resistance cannot be permanently guaranteed. It may notably be affected by the ageing of gaskets (rubber seals) or by an accidental shock to crown(not for your case). we recommend you have the Water Resistance of your timepiece checked once a year by an authorised Service Centre, preferably before the swimming activity.


The assessment confirms that the moisture ingress is from gasket deterioration. The watch is less than 4 years old. Is this even half way reasonable? The service is fully chargeable according to the PPSC. Any thoughts?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Be prepared for a long wait. This is the price to pay for being a Patek owner. Soon enough, we'll all get used to it.
josephashburnnn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2016, 09:03 PM   #11
waspy1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by josephashburnnn View Post
Be prepared for a long wait. This is the price to pay for being a Patek owner. Soon enough, we'll all get used to it.


I've been quoted 10-12 weeks which I think is acceptable


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 05:31 AM   #12
RW16610
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
 
RW16610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Rommel
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 9,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by waspy1 View Post
Here's the update following receipt and assessment by the PPSC:

Diagnosis:

Slight oxidization in movement
Circuit and Coil oxidized.
Gaskets deteriorated
Dial indexes discolored
Case and caseback are scratched and dented, signs of attrition.
Bracelet and buckle scratched.
A complete service is recommended.

Water Resistance: a watch’s water-resistance cannot be permanently guaranteed. It may notably be affected by the ageing of gaskets (rubber seals) or by an accidental shock to crown(not for your case). we recommend you have the Water Resistance of your timepiece checked once a year by an authorised Service Centre, preferably before the swimming activity.


The assessment confirms that the moisture ingress is from gasket deterioration. The watch is less than 4 years old. Is this even half way reasonable? The service is fully chargeable according to the PPSC. Any thoughts?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What a shame that is. I'm hoping they do manage to get this resolved faster. I had this happen before (to a MUCH cheaper watch, a Raymond Weil) but totally understand how paranoid it can make you after. Keep us posted
RW16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2016, 08:14 PM   #13
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
That sucks, maybe explain very politely to them that a watch which has been barely worn should not have this happening, and it gives a very bad reputation to PP, for me they should at least take part of the bill...
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 03:18 AM   #14
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapince View Post
That sucks, maybe explain very politely to them that a watch which has been barely worn should not have this happening, and it gives a very bad reputation to PP, for me they should at least take part of the bill...


Wearing it or not gaskets are ageing checking WR yearly is a reasonable request in case you bring your timepiece into water.


iPhone/Tapatalk
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2016, 09:22 PM   #15
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
How about a picture of the back. Attrition is quite a fancy word!!! Oxidation of metal and discoloration takes time it does happen over night so this has been going in for awhile. You buy the watch new? Cheers
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2016, 09:32 PM   #16
waspy1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlS View Post
How about a picture of the back. Attrition is quite a fancy word!!! Oxidation of metal and discoloration takes time it does happen over night so this has been going in for awhile. You buy the watch new? Cheers


Yes, the watch was new 3.5 years ago. Attrition certainly sounds extreme. It's been worn rarely and lightly over that time. Maximum equivalent to a few months use. There are a few swirl marks on the bezel and bracelet but nothing major and no signs of a knock. The assessment doesn't state that the gasket degradation is due to such 'attrition'.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2016, 09:54 PM   #17
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by waspy1 View Post
Yes, the watch was new 3.5 years ago. Attrition certainly sounds extreme. It's been worn rarely and lightly over that time. Maximum equivalent to a few months use. There are a few swirl marks on the bezel and bracelet but nothing major and no signs of a knock. The assessment doesn't state that the gasket degradation is due to such 'attrition'.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
well it says caseback is dented!!! Not sure how a caseback is dented whilst worn thats why i was intrigued.
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2016, 10:40 PM   #18
waspy1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlS View Post
well it says caseback is dented!!! Not sure how a caseback is dented whilst worn thats why i was intrigued.


Yeah I know. Given that the caseback is mostly sapphire I think that would be a struggle. There's no dents to the case either, just the usual blemishes which you'd expect. I'm not planning on having it polished as there's nothing so serious to warrant it. Like I mentioned, it's had light wear and got water into it while swimming on the surface of the pool. The gasket must be completely shot to allow water in with no pressure difference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 08:08 AM   #19
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passionata View Post
Wearing it or not gaskets are ageing checking WR yearly is a reasonable request in case you bring your timepiece into water.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but if Patek know they're using seals which deteriorate within the recommended service interval (3-5 years), you'd think they'd take steps to include such information in their owner manuals, wouldn't you?
As they don't, from the PDFs viewable on their site, then they must be confident that the seals should be good for a minimum of 5 years.
Given the relative lack of usage of this watch over the period since purchase (and assuming it was freshly assembled rather than sitting for some time), then the damaged parts list would indicate this has happened over time, and not as a result of this one incident.
As such, that would tend to suggest this particular watch falls short of Patek's quality levels.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 05:57 PM   #20
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but if Patek know they're using seals which deteriorate within the recommended service interval (3-5 years), you'd think they'd take steps to include such information in their owner manuals, wouldn't you?
As they don't, from the PDFs viewable on their site, then they must be confident that the seals should be good for a minimum of 5 years.
Given the relative lack of usage of this watch over the period since purchase (and assuming it was freshly assembled rather than sitting for some time), then the damaged parts list would indicate this has happened over time, and not as a result of this one incident.
As such, that would tend to suggest this particular watch falls short of Patek's quality levels.

Trust is good control is better.


iPhone/Tapatalk
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2016, 01:07 AM   #21
nakedtoes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: singapore
Posts: 122


could it be the 2 pcs design of the watch and sandwich with a black silicon seal in between and the seal wear off somehow or not secure properly in the first place?... I have the aquanaut and i know it is a single pc design .... i am thinking twice whether to get the 5712 or the 5726
nakedtoes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2016, 02:36 AM   #22
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by nakedtoes View Post




could it be the 2 pcs design of the watch and sandwich with a black silicon seal in between and the seal wear off somehow or not secure properly in the first place?... I have the aquanaut and i know it is a single pc design .... i am thinking twice whether to get the 5712 or the 5726


All modern Nautilus /aqua are made out of 3pcs ,bezel,case,transparentcaseback.The original ref.37xx were consist 2pcs ,a monoblocque case and the bezel.


iPhone/Tapatalk
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 10:30 AM   #23
Israguard
"TRF" Member
 
Israguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Montreal
Posts: 859
Moisture ingress to 5711

I'm not a PP owner.. and I won't jump on and say I don't want one or I won't buy one....


Let me be frank... 3.5 years and it leaks in water?.. these people make me sick. A $75 Seiko I bought on Amazon works better and doesn't leak.

When do we as consumers stand up and yell "enough"?

Shame on PP.. they shouldn't fix it for free... they should give him a new one and an apology letter.

All PP spend your hard earned $... someone has to read these people the riot act.

Ok ok I'm done
Israguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 11:38 AM   #24
waspy1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Israguard View Post
I'm not a PP owner.. and I won't jump on and say I don't want one or I won't buy one....


Let me be frank... 3.5 years and it leaks in water?.. these people make me sick. A $75 Seiko I bought on Amazon works better and doesn't leak.

When do we as consumers stand up and yell "enough"?

Shame on PP.. they shouldn't fix it for free... they should give him a new one and an apology letter.

All PP spend your hard earned $... someone has to read these people the riot act.

Ok ok I'm done


Thanks, can I give PPSC your phone number so you can explain why this is so unacceptable? Ha!

I really can't understand why a watch called 'nautilus' of all things cannot be guaranteed water proof for more than a year at a time. It's really perplexing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 11:42 AM   #25
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,109
What does this complete service cost?
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 11:51 AM   #26
waspy1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinr View Post
What does this complete service cost?


The quote not including polishing is about 1000usd


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 12:10 PM   #27
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by waspy1 View Post
The quote not including polishing is about 1000usd


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's surprisingly cheap. Can any of the US guys compare this to our prices?
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 11:50 AM   #28
waspy1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
Latest reply from PPSC when querying the gasket failure on this piece:

Generally, a timepiece has to be overhauled every 3- 5 years. As for the water-resistance for a timepiece , we recommend an annual examination to ensure the rubber gaskets are in good condition and intact, since the life-span of the rubber gaskets cannot be predetermined for its durability.
For the discoloration of the indexes on the dial, I have just confirmed with our watchmaker, they can be removed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 12:09 PM   #29
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,109
It was due for a service anyway so you're getting the water damage fixed and a service for a reasonable amount. The problem is now you won't feel like swimming with it on and I don't blame you. They're almost saying the gaskets aren't very reliable.
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 12:30 PM   #30
waspy1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
Moisture ingress to 5711

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinr View Post
It was due for a service anyway so you're getting the water damage fixed and a service for a reasonable amount. The problem is now you won't feel like swimming with it on and I don't blame you. They're almost saying the gaskets aren't very reliable.


I agree that the service cost is pretty reasonable. I would prefer it after 5 years than 3.5 but the cost itself isn't a problem. I didn't expect to need to baby this watch as it was generally the piece I wore when I expected I'd get wet. Most of my other pieces are vintage or dress pieces (Lange, journe). Maybe i need to get a new sub.....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Takuya Watches

DavidSW Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.