Hopefully Rolex is watching

[tyler1980]

Originally Posted by tng11

Or in-house chronograph movement, or resolving the egregious amount of quality issues they seem to be having with the 3126 calibre...

yep. Cant cherry pick one thing and make a "they listened to us" statement. A broken clock is still right twice a day.

[Canforfair]

I think you need to get out more . Rolex do what Rolex do! If u don’t like it go elsewhere. Stop moaning about something so petty . There is a big line up in Rolex if you can’t find one or more in the range you like then you need help . There must be millions of people thinking if only all they had to worry about was about a watch 2/4/or 6 mm bigger.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Devildog]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

At no point did I imply a lack of Daytona sales

Do you really think a 42mm Daytona would not sell as well?

Its ok for Rolex to have 2 options just like they do in most other models

Excluding Cellini, Rolex have 14 model lines.

Only 5 of these lines offer different sizes, and if those 5 only 4, those being the DJ, DD, OP and PM are properly different sizes of the same watch. The SD and SD43 being quite different in construction

The fact you think the SD43 is just a big sub date is irrelevant when we are looking at facts.

5 out of 14 is not even close to being “most models”

Whilst I agree there is no harm in offering a bigger Daytona (provided Rolex have capacity to do so), I believe that this thread was designed to be inflammatory, perhaps even trolling, rather than just “thoughtful” on your part

I do hope that I am wrong, however, as TRF is thankfully free of that behaviour

[GB-man]

Lol AP has been making 42mm sport chronos since 1993 and nobody was clamoring for them back then.

Rolex will not be changing the Daytona drastically any time soon.

[jrs146]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

Perhaps



But an AP 42mm chrono w ceramic bezel wipes the floor with the Daytona



just saying



I know where my chrono $$ gos



I badly want to spend it on a Rolex chrono but they dont make a size I like. I had to sell my 116520 due to its size. I was tricked.

I sold my 116520 because it was too small. Oddly though I’m very happy with my 116500. If you haven’t tried one on and you can you should. Call me crazy but it looks and feels bigger.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[aquatimerfla]

Originally Posted by Devildog

Excluding Cellini, Rolex have 14 model lines.

Only 5 of these lines offer different sizes, and if those 5 only 4, those being the DJ, DD, OP and PM are properly different sizes of the same watch. The SD and SD43 being quite different in construction

The fact you think the SD43 is just a big sub date is irrelevant when we are looking at facts.

5 out of 14 is not even close to being “most models”

Whilst I agree there is no harm in offering a bigger Daytona (provided Rolex have capacity to do so), I believe that this thread was designed to be inflammatory, perhaps even trolling, rather than just “thoughtful” on your part

I do hope that I am wrong, however, as TRF is thankfully free of that behaviour

Wow. Daytona owners are so sensitive!!!

I see nothing wrong with 40,42mm options especially considering the 40mm is really 38.5mm.

Did anyone see the beloved SD43 coming? Clearly Rolex disagrees with those that believe rolex is to only be 40mm.

[aquatimerfla]

Might not be a ‘Daytona’ as per say but a bigger chrono will come sooner than later. Book it.

[Seaswirl]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

Wow. Daytona owners are so sensitive!!!

I see nothing wrong with 40,42mm options especially considering the 40mm is really 38.5mm.

Did anyone see the beloved SD43 coming? Clearly Rolex disagrees with those that believe rolex is to only be 40mm.

Interesting logic. Anyone who disagrees with your thread or calls you out is sensitive/defensive. Dude, just save up and buy one.

[aquatimerfla]

Originally Posted by Seaswirl

Interesting logic. Anyone who disagrees with your thread or calls you out is sensitive/defensive. Dude, just save up and buy one.

I sold my 116520. Too small. I would however purchase a 42mm.

[Devildog]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

Wow. Daytona owners are so sensitive!!!

I see nothing wrong with 40,42mm options especially considering the 40mm is really 38.5mm.

Did anyone see the beloved SD43 coming? Clearly Rolex disagrees with those that believe rolex is to only be 40mm.

No sensitivity from me

Maybe you should try a pm Daytona C. They have larger cases

[tyler1980]

Originally Posted by Devildog

No sensitivity from me

Maybe you should try a pm Daytona C. They have larger cases

and they are actually available for purchase.

[OcdRob]

A larger Rolex chrono wouldnt be a bad thing but I wouldnt want it to be called a Daytona. Maybe one with a different sub dial arrangement and a date.

[vincenzowl]

They would never make such a drastic change in such a short amount of time with a model that has a reputation like the Daytona does. They have no reason to at the demand and premiums it is commanding now.

[superdog]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

Correct. Speedys History is legit. Just is. Cant manufacture 'history'.

If you think a 42mm Daytona would not sell your naive. It would go through the roof.

Is the current Daytona not already through the roof?

Fwiw, I would not buy it at 42mm. That would be too big for what I like. I am a big fan of it just the way it is.

[superdog]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

The 42$ ceramics are not even for sale yet. 44mm was too big. AP listened

And correct. The 44 is too big (at least for me). They are not selling as they likely should.

It does not appear that the Daytona has that problem.

I get it. You dont like them. Nothing wrong with that. Lots of people dont like them.

Lots of models to choose from.

Or brands too for that matter. I personally dont like the Rolex brand at all. I have had my fair share of angry posts about it.

However, I do very much like their watches.

[aquatimerfla]

Originally Posted by superdog

Is the current Daytona not already through the roof?

Fwiw, I would not buy it at 42mm. That would be too big for what I like. I am a big fan of it just the way it is.

Again. I didnt say that. We know the 40mm Daytona sales are already through the roof. Gos without saying.

I said 42mm Daytona sales would go through the roof.

No ones saying 40mm is a flawed product. A 42mm option brings back many who want a chrono from Rolex but not @ 40mm(38.5)

[aquatimerfla]

Originally Posted by superdog

And correct. The 44 is too big (at least for me). They are not selling as they likely should.

It does not appear that the Daytona has that problem.

I get it. You dont like them. Nothing wrong with that. Lots of people dont like them.

Lots of models to choose from.

Or brands too for that matter. I personally dont like the Rolex brand at all. I have had my fair share of angry posts about it.

However, I do very much like their watches.

I like the Daytona. I just want a bigger option. Many others do as well. A 42mm Daytona would have exact same waitlist assuming Rolex curbed supply as they do the 40mm.

I never said 'replace' 40 w 42. I said add a 42mm option

AP didnt offer a ceramic chrono @ 42 or 40 for that matter. Only 44mm. Too big for many. Many wanted a ceramic 42mm option. AP listened.

There are plenty of threads stating the Daytona is too small for many. Rolex has not provided them with a bigger option.

Rolex has proven to the dismay of purists that they are willing to offer different sizes across the popular sports model range minus the GMT.

I dont see why a 42mm Daytona or chrono yet to be named option should bother those who own the 40mm so much

[superdog]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

I like the Daytona. I just want a bigger option. Many others do as well. A 42mm Daytona would have exact same waitlist assuming Rolex curbed supply as they do the 40mm.

I never said 'replace' 40 w 42. I said add a 42mm option

AP didnt offer a ceramic chrono @ 42 or 40 for that matter. Only 44mm. Too big for many. Many wanted a ceramic 42mm option. AP listened.

There are plenty of threads stating the Daytona is too small for many. Rolex has not provided them with a bigger option.

Rolex has proven to the dismay of purists that they are willing to offer different sizes across the popular sports model range minus the GMT.

I dont see why a 42mm Daytona or chrono yet to be named option should bother those who own the 40mm so much

Why do you think it bothers me? Curious what I said that gives you that impression.

I’m fact, mine is just slightly bigger because it’s PM.

I appreciate your opinion and was just responding as part of the discussion.

[aquatimerfla]

Originally Posted by superdog

Why do you think it bothers me?

I’m fact, mine is just slightly bigger because it’s PM.

I appreciate your opinion and was just responding as part of the discussion.

I didnt say it bother you. I said it bothers 'those' which is apparent by the replys without reading the original post.

This is a discussion forum. Im not the only person who would liketo see a 42mm Daytona or Chrono from Rolex.

[scrappy]

Originally Posted by meganfox17

The typical production creation lifecycle of a Swiss watch that encompasses designing , R & D averages about 36 months.The exception are prototypes watches which can debut much earlier. Did you know that Omega's first fully ceramic Speedmaster DSOTM was already a design concept in 2009 but Omega wasn't sure when to release the model and the decision was only made 4 years later?

That means if a new Rolex watch makes its debut in Baselworld 2018, the design itself was probably based on what the consumers felt strongly about and desired from Rolex (and the watch industry) back in 2015. In other words, if the Rolex marketing team in Geneva is indeed reading your thread right now, any changes in the dimensions of the Daytona will only be seen in Baselworld 2021

Ya'know what I'm sayin....

It boggles my mind it takes so long to develop and release a wrist watch, especially with carry over or only a mildly updated movement. The automotive industry is aiming to compressing it's development cycle to 1 year. An entire car!

[Agustin_Nielsen]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

AP just released a 42mm steel chrono w ceramic bezel at 2018 SIHH

AP listened to its base. 44mm was too big for many.

Perhaps Rolex will release a 42mm Daytona

Lots of Rolexes base think 40mm(38.5) is too small

I can't find it. Could someone please send me a link or picture?

[douglasf13]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

Why?

Because Douglas said so

No, because Rolex said so. If it were up to me, I'd ask them to go back to 37mm:

[aquatimerfla]

Originally Posted by douglasf13

No, because Rolex said so. If it were up to me, I'd ask them to go back to 37mm:

Im confused? Rolex said that the 40mm Daytona fits everyone under an 8" wrist? If im not mistaken thats for the customer to decide which watch fits/wears best?

I have no problems with a 37mm Daytona offering. In fact a great idea.

Daytona 37mm,40mm,42mm options would be off the charts for Rolex

[aquatimerfla]

Originally Posted by Agustin_Nielsen

I can't find it. Could someone please send me a link or picture?

go to APs website and click 'watches'

All NEW 2018 models have NEW underneath picture

[superdog]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

I didnt say it bother you. I said it bothers 'those' which is apparent by the replys without reading the original post.

This is a discussion forum. Im not the only person who would liketo see a 42mm Daytona or Chrono from Rolex.

Ok. My mistake. It seemed like you were suggesting it bothered me, and I was curious why.

Fwiw, I read your OP first and jumped right to my own reply before reading the discussion.

Id venture a guess that it’s your tone and your verbiage that potentially prompts some to respond in a manner in which you feel they are “bothered”.

But hey, you do you.

[douglasf13]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

If im not mistaken thats for the customer to decide which watch fits/wears best?

Nope, Rolex is more like Apple in that they tell you what you want, not the other way around, and it's been working for them for a long time. The paradox of choice can be self defeating for a customer.

[aquatimerfla]

Originally Posted by superdog

Ok. My mistake. It seemed like you were suggesting it bothered me, and I was curious why.

Fwiw, I read your OP first and jumped right to my own reply before reading the discussion.

Id venture a guess that it’s your tone and your verbiage that potentially prompts some to respond in a manner in which you feel they are “bothered”.

But hey, you do you.

Hence the problem of 'typing' or 'texting'. Known phenomenon. The 'size' issue on any watch for that matter is contentious as it is let alone questioning the Daytona.

I ask this however. Rolex went from the 37mm Daytona to the 40mm Daytona. Was their massive outrage at the time? we will never know because watch forums did not exist

I dont think its outrageous to suggest that Rolex offer a 42mm Daytona or Chrono option. Those 40mm fans outraged by the suggestion should ask themselves if they would wear a 37mm Daytona. If not....whats the difference?

Great discussion

[aquatimerfla]

Originally Posted by douglasf13

Nope, Rolex is more like Apple in that they tell you what you want, not the other way around, and it's been working for them for a long time. The paradox of choice can be self defeating.

Not quite.

Nice try though

[douglasf13]

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

Not quite.

Nice try though

I'm serious, though. That's exactly how you run a business with a pseudo-cultish following, be it Apple or Rolex. If you don't like what they make, they're fine with it. It just means you're not in the "club." I can't think of a brand that's offered less size options than Rolex, and it's worked well for them. I'd personally be fine if all of their watches were between 34-40mm.

[Art 1]

I hope Rolex stays with the 40mm Daytona. They have no reason to up the size from a business standpoint. If a buyer needs a larger chrono there are other larger options.