The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: Tudor GMT owners date wheel experience
My Date works just fine thanks 136 41.59%
My Date has obvious issues 75 22.94%
I'm unsure 116 35.47%
Voters: 327. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 August 2018, 12:34 AM   #61
Brian Page
"TRF" Member
 
Brian Page's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 6,623
I want to hear from those that had it "repaired" it will be interesting to see if the problem returns...
Brian Page is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2018, 12:48 AM   #62
Bluside
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bluside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Page View Post
I want to hear from those that had it "repaired" it will be interesting to see if the problem returns...
I would like to know this also. However, the problem did not show up on mine until exactly one month of ownership and use.
Bluside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2018, 12:51 AM   #63
Brian Page
"TRF" Member
 
Brian Page's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 6,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluside View Post
I would like to know this also. However, the problem did not show up on mine until exactly one month of ownership and use.
Yeah, were gonna have to wait a while to see how this sorts out.
Brian Page is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2018, 01:23 AM   #64
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Shame. Some understandably ticked off people on this thread. I intended to buy one minty second hand and it seems a gamble now. This has pushed my purchase forward possibly years.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2018, 02:29 AM   #65
chuey38
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: UK
Watch: 15202
Posts: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Page View Post
I want to hear from those that had it "repaired" it will be interesting to see if the problem returns...
mine developed the problem at 1 month owernship
was at rolex SC for 3 weeks.

ive since had it back for 3 weeks and so far so good
have i tempted fate?!
chuey38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2018, 03:09 AM   #66
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
Shame. Some understandably ticked off people on this thread. I intended to buy one minty second hand and it seems a gamble now. This has pushed my purchase forward possibly years.
likewise. it shut me down. i was on the fence and this pushed me to the do not buy (for now) side.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2018, 03:19 AM   #67
JP(Canada)
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary, AB, CAN
Posts: 795
Knocking on one month now of daily wear. Zero issues. Insane accuracy.
__________________
JP
JP(Canada) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2018, 05:51 AM   #68
josephvman
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 808
Mine is at Dallas service now. I’ll post when I hear something from them.
josephvman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2018, 05:28 PM   #69
Stevec14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,470
Mine appeared fixed with some rolling date forward, but after a month of good running it has started jumping 2 days again. Into RSC next week
Stevec14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2018, 05:50 PM   #70
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 692
Month and a week since I have it - zero issues with the date change. Excellent accuracy (2 seconds gain per 24hrs).

Sent from my MI 5 using Tapatalk
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2018, 01:30 PM   #71
chicityhorology
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1
Date jumped after not even a week of ownership.

Got the watch last Friday and it jumped from Sept 12 the to 14th. It's a beautiful watch but what a shame. Have others gotten theirs back from RSC? What are they doing to fix it? So weird!
chicityhorology is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2018, 07:21 PM   #72
DMM_78
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: MI
Posts: 264
I sent mine to RSC in Dallas. They sent me an email that it’s been received and they’ll let me know once a technician looks at it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DMM_78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 04:09 AM   #73
vicdeng
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by josephvman View Post
Mine is at Dallas service now. I’ll post when I hear something from them.
Any update from Rolex? I hate to see my watch gone for a few months. They said a typical repair is 3-4 weeks. Just want to hear your experience.
vicdeng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 04:10 AM   #74
vicdeng
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMM_78 View Post
I sent mine to RSC in Dallas. They sent me an email that it’s been received and they’ll let me know once a technician looks at it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Keep us updated.

Thanks
vicdeng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 04:13 AM   #75
derekhayden
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: Tudor BBGMT
Posts: 793
Quote:
Originally Posted by vicdeng View Post
Any update from Rolex? I hate to see my watch gone for a few months. They said a typical repair is 3-4 weeks. Just want to hear your experience.
Just picked mine up yesterday from getting serviced in Dallas. It was gone for 3 weeks exactly. I received no paper work on what was done so not sure how they are wording the repair. I do have a great AD with a good contact at RSC that walked it through for me so not sure if that timing is normal.
derekhayden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 05:40 AM   #76
bcat37645
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Brad
Location: Washington DC
Watch: SubC, 116610LN
Posts: 146
Mine has not had the date issue...picked up from AD on 6/31/2018 and serial begins I761...time wise, it's consistently run 6 sec fast over a 24 hr period or just w/in COSC.
bcat37645 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 06:10 AM   #77
oldman2005
"TRF" Member
 
oldman2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by daytonagmt View Post
So disappointed with Tudor. I sent it back to the service centre and they said they need to run the movement to figure out what is happening. Attachment 974565

Sent from my SM-G9550 using Tapatalk
My Rolex GMT has no problem after 10 years, I'd just get a Rolex and be done with it
oldman2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 06:17 AM   #78
SG56
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
SG56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Tampa
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 2,674
Mine was shipped after laborday. so, not full 3 weeks yet.
__________________
Sea-Dweller 116600 - the manly one
GMT II 16710 - the manly one
Daytona 116500 - the manly-womanly one
Yacht-Master 268622 - the chick version
Speedy Mitsukoshi <3
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAF141C.BA0824 - the chick version

Thank you logan5tx!!! Have to link it. Too long for the signature.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...0&postcount=14
SG56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 07:34 AM   #79
Dean57
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 12
My date works perfectly.
Dean57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 07:55 AM   #80
kangajack
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by V1ad View Post
Got one from Frankfurt duty free week ago and obvious date issue now. I wish I checked web before but how can one expect that from Rolex/Tudor.


Because it’s a Tudor, not a Rolex. Sure Tudor is owned by Rolex, but if you want Rolex quality, buy a Rolex.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kangajack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 08:12 AM   #81
Snow-Dweller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Snow-Dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by kangajack View Post
Because it’s a Tudor, not a Rolex. Sure Tudor is owned by Rolex, but if you want Rolex quality, buy a Rolex.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tell that to the people who bought a DD40 when it was released....and the date didn’t work.

And that for approximately 10 or 12 times the price of a Tudor
__________________
.
The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings...
———————————————————————————————————

.
16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D.
Snow-Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 08:51 AM   #82
Air Rescue 5
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: GMT MII
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally Posted by kangajack View Post
Because it’s a Tudor, not a Rolex. Sure Tudor is owned by Rolex, but if you want Rolex quality, buy a Rolex.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is a poor response. If these guys pay 3,900 for a watch, it ought to work as intended.
Air Rescue 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 11:38 AM   #83
SG56
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
SG56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Tampa
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 2,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air Rescue 5 View Post
This is a poor response. If these guys pay 3,900 for a watch, it ought to work as intended.
Agreed!
__________________
Sea-Dweller 116600 - the manly one
GMT II 16710 - the manly one
Daytona 116500 - the manly-womanly one
Yacht-Master 268622 - the chick version
Speedy Mitsukoshi <3
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAF141C.BA0824 - the chick version

Thank you logan5tx!!! Have to link it. Too long for the signature.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...0&postcount=14
SG56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 12:16 PM   #84
kangajack
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air Rescue 5 View Post
This is a poor response. If these guys pay 3,900 for a watch, it ought to work as intended.


They overpaid trying to find a cheap way into a Rolex GMT II. Tudor isn’t Rolex.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
kangajack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 01:28 PM   #85
josephvman
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 808
Spoke with RSC today, and apparently they are waiting on replacement movements that they expect next month. I’m curious to see if any of the early RSC repairs that didn’t get any new parts start acting up after time.
josephvman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2018, 03:04 AM   #86
Snow-Dweller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Snow-Dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by kangajack View Post
They overpaid trying to find a cheap way into a Rolex GMT II. Tudor isn’t Rolex.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
What utter nonsense.

It’s a new movement. Shit happens....as it did with the DD40, but you conveniently chose to ignore that comment above.

I don’t believe anybody here is trying to be cheap. Some just like Tudor watches. I have two GMTCs (including the WG). Right now I’m enjoying my BB GMT more.
__________________
.
The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings...
———————————————————————————————————

.
16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D.
Snow-Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2018, 03:43 AM   #87
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by kangajack View Post
They overpaid trying to find a cheap way into a Rolex GMT II. Tudor isn’t Rolex.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Interesting take. People have to pay to play if they want the date to work.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2018, 04:39 AM   #88
kangajack
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
Interesting take. People have to pay to play if they want the date to work.


Not the “take” at all. It’s simple... if they want a Rolex, buy a Rolex instead of a GMT II knockoff expecting the same quality movement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kangajack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2018, 05:36 AM   #89
SG56
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
SG56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Tampa
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 2,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by kangajack View Post
They overpaid trying to find a cheap way into a Rolex GMT II. Tudor isn’t Rolex.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by kangajack View Post
Not the “take” at all. It’s simple... if they want a Rolex, buy a Rolex instead of a GMT II knockoff expecting the same quality movement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

OMG are you a funny one
__________________
Sea-Dweller 116600 - the manly one
GMT II 16710 - the manly one
Daytona 116500 - the manly-womanly one
Yacht-Master 268622 - the chick version
Speedy Mitsukoshi <3
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAF141C.BA0824 - the chick version

Thank you logan5tx!!! Have to link it. Too long for the signature.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...0&postcount=14
SG56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2018, 10:39 AM   #90
Snow-Dweller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Snow-Dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by SG56 View Post
OMG are you a funny one
__________________
.
The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings...
———————————————————————————————————

.
16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D.
Snow-Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.