ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 September 2018, 02:07 PM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: S. California
Watch: your mouth..
Posts: 118
|
Well that solves that! SD FOR SALE!
I really hope I don't see an DSSD in a case.. hahaha Funny because some pictures of the SD vs BLNR it looks close in size, wonder if you could tell if you didn't know and they weren't right next to each other. |
17 September 2018, 02:29 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: "BG"
Location: PacNW
Watch: that I'm Jonesin 4
Posts: 626
|
Can't go wrong with the SD43. Just an awesome piece.
If the DSSD feels a bit big check out an Everest or RubberB band for it. They make the larger pieces feel more comfortable on the wrist for daily wear. If you can pull it off like Anthony....by all means do it! And send us some pics. What a great shot that was! |
17 September 2018, 02:44 PM | #63 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex Pepsi
Posts: 543
|
I’m fortunate enough to have multiple Rolex watches (I’m old that’s the trade off) I’m wearing my sd43 as my everyday watch. I’m looking for a ym2. Big is better
Richard B. #16013 datejust, #216580 Explorer 2 (PVD’d), #16710 Pepsi#218238 yg President, #116610LV Hulk, #126600 Sea dweller |
17 September 2018, 03:18 PM | #64 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
|
|
17 September 2018, 04:16 PM | #65 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
Big man wrist shots wanted!
I’m about 230 and 5’10” with 7 3/4” wrists and I wear a 1675 on a NATO; I really like the fit and feel, but I also wear my watches a bit looser than you do. The Gmt on your wrist looks a bit tight to me and emphasises the disjunct between watch diameter and wrist size. My wrists are not terribly wide, but have some depth to them, so lug-to-lug may be less of an issue.
However, I heartily recommend you take a look at Bremont. They have a 43mm case that fits like a glove because of careful lug design. Their watches are also bomb proof and well designed. Though I prefer the 1675 to my Alt1-ZT/BK, it’s only because I’m not fond of the buckle on their leather straps (it irritates my wrist) and the NATO makes the watch sit too high for many shirt cuffs. As far as the watch goes, it’s outstanding — possibly, in fact, the best watch I’ve ever owned (and I’ve had many high-end pieces). By comparison, here is a 116713 on my wrist: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
18 September 2018, 08:02 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: S. California
Watch: your mouth..
Posts: 118
|
What do you guys think of the SM300 Trilogy? HMM?!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.