Tudor vs Omega (in 2021)

[7enderbender]

I really like the new Tudors. That said, I’m partial to anything Speedmaster - but not a fan at all of the newly released models. Too far away from the original watches that actually went to space.

[liberalclown]

I agree with the most, Omega is overall a better brand than Tudor except in the dive watch category.

Omegas Divers are great watches, case finishing, bracelet quality and movement is much better than Tudor, however those alone doesn't make the watch. POs are big and thick, SMPs have that ugly peanut butter cup HE escape valve and outdated bracelet design. Until Omega brings back Seamaster 300 sword hand (watchco), Tudor divers will be my choice. I like the new Seamaster 300 (reissue) but sandwich dial is a reminiscent of PAMs.

[gnuyork]

Originally Posted by 7enderbender

I really like the new Tudors. That said, I’m partial to anything Speedmaster - but not a fan at all of the newly released models. Too far away from the original watches that actually went to space.

Really? In what way? Aesthetically they are even more like the watches that went to the moon. The only difference, and it's somewhat of a major difference, I'll give you that, is a Co-Axial escapement and hacking. But because of that my Speedmaster is +.04 seconds a day. I'm quite pleased.

[No SUBctitute]

Originally Posted by Doc Savage

Have you tried the non-GMT Aqua Terra? They are some of the most comfortable watches I have ever worn. Fits better than my Submariner. Of course, YMMV.

Yes, I tried the normal AT a long time ago. I def should try again if considering a non-GMT watch.

[alphadweller]

Personally I find Omega to be on another level, from a pure emotional perspective. It resonates with me in a way Tudor can't compete. I would still own, wear and appreciate a Tudor for what it is. It's just that a Speedy and a Seamaster have an aura about them that Tudor lacks. IMHO.

[Plant]

Originally Posted by csaltphoto

Same here. They also can't seem to quite stop themselves from adding some funky design detail that ruins the whole thing like skeleton hands, funky shaped indices, protruding HEV, Hideous clasp, weird bracelets, yada. That is one place where Rolex really stands out is comfortable watches with timeless design (mostly).

Agree with both these statements 100%

If Omega made a DJ 36 competitor that was as thin, comfortable and reserved as a DJ I would sell my Rolex and buy it immediately.

Omega is a brand I like in theory but I dislike their watches. Rolex is the opposite: I dont like anything about the hype and nonsense around the brand. Honesty pretty much every Rolex is overpriced at this point too. However, noone makes a better daily wear watch than Rolex that I can afford so Im sticking with Rolex even though I would be very happy never setting foot in a Rolex AD ever again

[JRell]

The battle of the worst watches, who will win? Speedmaster or do not bother with either IMO.

[EEpro]

Originally Posted by Plant

Agree with both these statements 100%

If Omega made a DJ 36 competitor that was as thin, comfortable and reserved as a DJ I would sell my Rolex and buy it immediately.

Omega is a brand I like in theory but I dislike their watches. Rolex is the opposite: I dont like anything about the hype and nonsense around the brand. Honesty pretty much every Rolex is overpriced at this point too. However, noone makes a better daily wear watch than Rolex that I can afford so Im sticking with Rolex even though I would be very happy never setting foot in a Rolex AD ever again

Aqua Terra has a reserved well-proportioned design with a lot of dial color and texture options and nice bracelets or rubber straps for $5,700 msrp and can actually be had for $4k. Better WR plus the other benefits of Omega movement.

I really like this one though more pricey than a datejust.

[Krash]

Originally Posted by EEpro

Aqua Terra has a reserved well-proportioned design with a lot of dial color and texture options and nice bracelets or rubber straps for $5,700 msrp and can actually be had for $4k. Better WR plus the other benefits of Omega movement.

I really like this one though more pricey than a datejust.

That watch is sweet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JohnGingerwood]

Originally Posted by EEpro

Aqua Terra has a reserved well-proportioned design with a lot of dial color and texture options and nice bracelets or rubber straps for $5,700 msrp and can actually be had for $4k. Better WR plus the other benefits of Omega movement.

I really like this one though more pricey than a datejust.

I would consider this over a DJ.

[holdingon]

Omega is not in great shape. They lost the battle with Rolex. Tudor is now a serious threat…. Not good.

[minute_man]

Omega offers far better a product than Tudor.
There is no comparison, really in just about every aspect. From history to movements, technology, fit and finish, movements decoration, dials, the list goes on... So much more refinement and value for money. Some would (rightfully) argue that Omega loses much to brand dilution with several limited editions, variations makeovers etc. But Tudor is also about to fall victim of the Black Bay line much in the same way.
In fact, should Tudor opts to keep releasing 3-4 "Black Bay" iterations a year, they should be changing name...

[AJMarcus]

I know this is TRF but, seriously, Tudor is nowhere near the quality of Omega.

[JohnGingerwood]

Originally Posted by holdingon

Omega is not in great shape. They lost the battle with Rolex. Tudor is now a serious threat…. Not good.

Yeah they look like they’re struggling.

[Krash]

Originally Posted by holdingon

Omega is not in great shape. They lost the battle with Rolex. Tudor is now a serious threat…. Not good.

What?

[Plant]

Originally Posted by EEpro

Aqua Terra has a reserved well-proportioned design with a lot of dial color and texture options and nice bracelets or rubber straps for $5,700 msrp and can actually be had for $4k. Better WR plus the other benefits of Omega movement.

I really like this one though more pricey than a datejust.

Ive tried the Aqua Terra on a few times and I really prefer my DJ 36 126200. The dial colors are nice, but I dont like the triangle indexes, arrow minute hand, or the second hand compared to the DJ. I also prefer the case shape, bracelet, proportions, and overall feel on the wrist of the DJ.

Rolex designs are more "timeless", I like how the DJ 36 has stayed so similar over the years. That AT could look dated in 10 years but a DJ 36 will always be classic and good looking. The only futureproof Omega to me is the Speedmaster, the rest they update too often to be classic.

[johnorpheus]

Originally Posted by JRell

The battle of the worst watches, who will win? Speedmaster or do not bother with either IMO.

If this thread was the battle of worst opinions, you would have won handily.

[Mr Biggles]

Wow is this a real question...
Omega's history, brand heritage, technical prowess vastly exceeds Tudor. They are not even in the same league
In fact, the only area Rolex itself excels above omega is marketing and maintaining a powerful brand image.

I get this is TRF but sometimes the amount of omega disrespect is not deserved

[Omarion07]

Originally Posted by Mr Biggles

In fact, the only area Rolex itself excels above omega is marketing and maintaining a powerful brand image

Each to their own but that's not true. Rolex is still slightly superior to Omega in terms of movements (apart from the anti-magnetism) and built quality. But it's not 4000 $ more superior.
And I don't think it's disrespectful to start comparing Tudor to Omega.

[Kevain]

I’ll bite.

My omega (po 42mm 8500) is an amazing watch. But it is heavy on the bracelet and quite tall, no matter how you try to frame it. Great watch but can be uncomfortable when wearing several layers of clothing in the winter.

The Tudor BB58 is a much lighter, thinner watch. It’s a nice piece, I love wearing it, but to say it has the Omega beat in any other way than its dimensions wouldn’t resonate with me.

Kinda like my Explorer 39mm. Slim, lightweight but not particularly more or less impressive than the Omega. They’re all nice watches and get worn about equally (with a Panerai thrown into the mix). The Tudor is the newest so it gets a bit more time now, but it will even out.

[Alex_TA]

Originally Posted by liberalclown

First BB Chrono against new Speedy
Then Gold BB58 against Bronze Gold Seamaster 300
Now Black Black BB Metas against Black Black Seamaster Pro Metas

Very similar releases this year in very similar price points. Omega released them first but I wonder who "get inspired" from whom? Is it Tudor targeting Omega's market or Omega trying to grab Tudor's mostly younger customer demographic's attention?

Great nickname.

[GaoKS]

I waited a very long time for a 114060 Sub and love it to to death, however, my Omega SMPc 300 on a Zealande rubber still gets a TON of wrist time. Watch for watch the only thing I can say is objectively better is the bracelet on the Sub. IMO - Seamaster to BB line is not even in the same league. That’s just my opinion. I also second the notions above regarding the new Aqua Terra’s - especially on the rubber straps

[oldman2005]

Omega is on higher level than Tudor, in the US more people knows about Seiko than Tudor. Tudor is Rolex 2nd line or basically a poorman's Rolex

[6XYBE63ST]

neither, i would buy a panerai...

[Krash]

Originally Posted by Omarion07

Each to their own but that's not true. Rolex is still slightly superior to Omega in terms of movements (apart from the anti-magnetism) and built quality. But it's not 4000 $ more superior.
And I don't think it's disrespectful to start comparing Tudor to Omega.

I’m a huge Omega fan, but I think Rolex is heads above by a lot. I also think Omega is heads above Tudor by a lot more.

I remember trying on a DJ41, blue dial, jubilee, fluted bezel. This was about 3 or 4 years ago when DJ41s and some other less popular SS models were still in the display cases.

Anyway, I tried on the DJ41 and was totally blown away by it. I then tried on a blue dial Aqua Terra. The Aqua Terra was nice, but nowhere near as impressive as the DJ41.

By the way, it was a huge mistake for me not to buy that DJ41 because that exact watch is not nearly as easy to get as it once was.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[garyk]

Have both, awesome and awesome...

[Atone]

I have a few speedy’s and a BB chrono dark LE. Omega is a lot more watch in many ways. Love the BB but it’s not even close.

[Texex]

I own two of each and like the Tudors more. I think the Heritage Chrono and BB bronze are so unique. All that said the Omegas are a better quality and it’s not close. I have the previous generation 300 Pro and the new non LE Railmaster. Other than the bracelets they rival Rolex in my opinion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Geckobros]

I have a SMP, 2 AT's, Ranger and BB58. All great watches. IMO Omega makes a better watch.

[mountainjogger]

Not going to touch the issue of who makes a better movement or even a better overall watch. I see both sides.

But wearability is key to me and that requires an esthetically pleasing, comfortable and sturdy bracelet. To me, Omega has never gotten the bracelet issue right. Rolex is tops on the bracelet contest. Tudor is second. And Omega last. Just my opinion.