Super rare 6542 GMT AKA Pussy Galore

[chocopeluche]

Originally Posted by jatco

I don't know much about Xeramic's credentials with only 14 posts in 11 years on TRF but he sounds knowledgeable....

Checkout his post history on VRF (Vintage Rolex Forum). There are some incredibly in depth posts which would likely be pinned if they were posted here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[winst]

Simply lovely!

[Knappo 1307]

Originally Posted by Kingface66

Gorgeous? Did you read the subsequent comments, or just the first one? Check out the one Xeramic posted.

I'll put my faith in Ridley, whom actually put his hands on the watch and Also John Springer, and David (crowncollection). I'm sure Phillip would not post pictures and comment on a fake/franken watch....

[Kingface66]

Originally Posted by Knappo 1307

I'll put my faith in Ridley, whom actually put his hands on the watch and Also John Springer, and David (crowncollection). I'm sure Phillip would not post pictures and comment on a fake/franken watch....

Understood, and, of course that’s your perogative. But, my comment was aimed at the poster I was quoting (and this happens a lot) who replies in a totally perfunctory way, suggesting that the entire thread wasn’t read.
That said, Xeramic, and his many posts over many years on VRF and elsewhere, don’t appear to be those of a rookie.

But, I could be wrong…

[Knappo 1307]

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

Brilliant, Phillip!
dP

Originally Posted by THC

Wow, what a reference to behold in person.. well done sir

Originally Posted by FTX I

Outstanding. Thanks for sharing.

Originally Posted by brandrea

That’s incredible … what a piece of history. Thank you for sharing it with us, and nice job on the restoration

Originally Posted by 1675-David

Originally Posted by springer

Very Nice Phillip.

Originally Posted by sensui

That is a hell of a find for some lucky guy out there. Amazing.

Originally Posted by Kingface66

Understood, and, of course that’s your perogative. But, my comment was aimed at the poster I was quoting (and this happens a lot) who replies in a totally perfunctory way, suggesting that the entire thread wasn’t read.
That said, Xeramic, and his many posts over many years on VRF and elsewhere, don’t appear to be those of a rookie.

But, I could be wrong…

I agree with you if it's one poster, but when all these knowledgeable people post about it I tend to believe it's a nice example. But then again I could be wrong also...

[Kingface66]

Originally Posted by Knappo 1307

I agree with you if it's one poster, but when all these knowledgeable people post about it I tend to believe it's a nice example. But then again I could be wrong also...

Raising a glass (a scotch on the rocks ON an Amtrak) in your direction!

[jatco]

Originally Posted by chocopeluche

Checkout his post history on VRF (Vintage Rolex Forum). There are some incredibly in depth posts which would likely be pinned if they were posted here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wasn't aware of VRF.
Thx

[Knappo 1307]

Just sent a PM to Phillip, asking for a follow up. After all, we are all here to learn.

[ltmgeller]

[GTS Dean]

Outstanding work! Thanks for sharing this example.

[steversaurus]

Originally Posted by chocopeluche

Checkout his post history on VRF (Vintage Rolex Forum). There are some incredibly in depth posts which would likely be pinned if they were posted here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

His write up on Submariner inserts might be the best thing I’ve read all year on any Rolex forum.

[MILGAUSS88]

Originally Posted by Knappo 1307

I'll put my faith in Ridley, whom actually put his hands on the watch and Also John Springer, and David (crowncollection). I'm sure Phillip would not post pictures and comment on a fake/franken watch....

I respect Springer and David's opinions on watches, but I don't really think they addressed the watch itself in there comments.

Originally Posted by springer

Very Nice Phillip.

Originally Posted by crowncollection

great job

[WKHendrickson]

Looks great, congrats.

[fmc000]

I'm astonished by comments like this one above my post.

[Tavli3]

Originally Posted by steversaurus

His write up on Submariner inserts might be the best thing I’ve read all year on any Rolex forum.

Can you post a link to it for some reason I can't find it on VRF or under a search of his posts. Thanks.

Edit: I've read most of his posts which covers a wide range of topics and I would say he is not to be questioned unless you're an expert yourself. Those who are questioning his comments should take the time to read his posts. Vintageland is a minefield and us nonexperts are raw red meat in the shark tank without the help of the members who contribute their time and expertise.

[roh123]

Late to the party but that insert is undoubtably aftermarket. Hands are short, curved and fake too. Coronet is not what you expect on a 50’s gilt dial. Xeramic nailed it.

Would be interesting to hear back from the thread starter.

[MILGAUSS88]

Originally Posted by fmc000

I'm astonished by comments like this one above my post.

I think some people chose to compliment Phillips work, rather than jump into The fray of whether or not it's authentic. I think it is all right to do that.

Not everyone feels qualified to determine if this watch is correct or not.

[MILGAUSS88]

I hope Philip does not stop posting photos of his projects on here, due to the kerfuffle of this one watch.

I appreciate him taking his time to show his work, and would like to bring him some watches to work on some day.

[Kingface66]

Originally Posted by MILGAUSS88

I think some people chose to compliment Phillips work, rather than jump into The fray of whether or not it's authentic. I think it is all right to do that.

Not everyone feels qualified to determine if this watch is correct or not.

I think it’s probably a case of people looking at the pictures and then not bothering to continue reading the subsequent comments. Happens all the time.

[fmc000]

Exactly.

Inviato dal mio SM-T719 utilizzando Tapatalk

[Tavli3]

Originally Posted by MILGAUSS88

I hope Philip does not stop posting photos of his projects on here, due to the kerfuffle of this one watch.

I appreciate him taking his time to show his work, and would like to bring him some watches to work on some day.

Why should it discourage Philip, he's a watchmaker not a vintage historian expert like Xeramic, don't think Xeramic can do what Philip does so why would we expect Philip to do what Xeramic can do?

[MILGAUSS88]

Originally Posted by Kingface66

I think it’s probably a case of people looking at the pictures and then not bothering to continue reading the subsequent comments. Happens all the time.

Well, he has not come back, and responded to this thread, after the authenticity of the parts were questioned.
Which was not the result that I wanted.

[Kingface66]

Originally Posted by MILGAUSS88

Well, he has not come back, and responded to this thread, after the authenticity of the parts were questioned.
Which was not the result that I wanted.

Agreed. I’m certainly not going to speculate, but I’d love to hear something!

[MILGAUSS88]

Looks like I quoted the wrong person, I was trying to respond to Tavli3 on my last post.

Sent from my moto z4 using Tapatalk

[scooba]

What ever has been said it’s a nice watch even with its warts, Thank you Philip for sharing and also to Xeramic for his knowledge and education as always, I have read lots of his posts over the years on VRF if he said it ,He will be correct

Two very nice Gents sharing there individual experience and expertise

[springer]

Originally Posted by Tavli3

Why should it discourage Philip, he's a watchmaker not a vintage historian expert like Xeramic, don't think Xeramic can do what Philip does so why would we expect Philip to do what Xeramic can do?

Good point. The watch was sent to Phillip for a service, not a complete vintage authentication. This watch may very well contain many fake and/or deceptive parts. Very few people know are capable of authenticating these old, vintage 6542s - I being one of them. I stay as far away as possible from these watches due to the proliferation of not only complete counterfeit watches, but many with aftermarket parts.

Many have been fooled by these vintage models that are fake or contain aftermarket parts - to include some of the big-name auction houses and some of the reputable trusted dealers discussed here in past threads.

[Filipão]

Originally Posted by Xeramic

Nothing to say against the job, of course - but although the pics are low res, the dial, hands, bezel, bakelite and bracelet look not good.

Try to find this dial type anywhere, just start with the coronet... and a strange surface and printing, appears not even like a gilt dial.
Shape of minute and hour hand incorrect (curved instead of flat), minute hand too short, hands shiny instead of matte - later or aftermarket (pics too bad to say for sure); would also not bid on that mini hand.
Bezel too large (check like it protrudes the case on the crown side, the upper as well as the under side) and with wrong profile.
Insert too much domed, strange layout color, artificially aged surface and unknown font.
Bracelet with wrong cap logo, wrong scroll logo, wrong 80s ends, all shiny like new...

IMO an Asian marriage.

Greetings,
Xeramic

Thank you so much.

[Verdi]

I have a good watchmaker that I use for many years. He works on any brand....vintage and new. He is no expert in a certain model or brand. He fixes and restores watches....he does not authenticate and he makes it clear.

Obviously, Philip is a very good watchmaker and I personally draw a very clear line between his work and whatever is wrong with this particular watch.

[baumare]

What I see in this tread are two experts showings their skills, one in the art of watchmaking and one in the study of Vintage Rolex, I can only thank them for sharing their knowledge. At this point the owner of the watch (which he may follow this TD) has a watch in perfect working condition and a technical evaluation from an expert.
Personally I learned the hard way to ask an expert before buying and service a collectible item such a 6542...

[fmc000]

Originally Posted by baumare

What I see in this tread are two experts showings their skills, one in the art of watchmaking and one in the study of Vintage Rolex, I can only thank them for sharing their knowledge. At this point the owner of the watch (which he may follow this TD) has a watch in perfect working condition and a technical evaluation from an expert.

And I suspect he has a much lighter bank account too...

Inviato dal mio SM-T719 utilizzando Tapatalk