ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sushisummo · 28 December 2009, 06:22 AM

Ohhhh noooo........no wrist pic then....

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

I have sat back and read each and every last post that has been put up on this thread and to tell you the truth i would not believe it either that's just human nature!

I'm going to explain why i would not post the pictures one last time and from here i'm going to leve well enough alone as paul said to keep the peace!

1) I'm not librety to give you information on this timepiece if i choose to do so it will not be on a open forum like this, we just had a guy get scammed here on TRF and after reading some of the post here i'm not to sure if someone may try to do harm to me with the economy being the way it is "please don't hold your breath"

2) it was my mistake to even put a post out here like this with me" being a newbie and all "suddenely your purchasing a watch of this magnitude dosen't sit well with someone who just lost thier job or home or someone who is on the brink of losing both.

Let's face it not to many pepole like myself are very well liked these days!
All that really matters is that i know i own one , and as i stated before i would not believe it either!

And under the advice of my consul i will not be posting pics of the piece.

To all that feel offended , confused and disarrayed i apoligize....

JJ Irani · 28 December 2009, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnEaton

I must confess, it was I who sold the Patek to deserted AKA chilvary...

And now having confirmed that his funds have finally cleared, can report that indeed the timepiece is authentic, or at least that is what I was assured when I picked this fantastic timepiece up in a Nigerian market on my infamous worldwide Margarita tour in 2007.

Words like NIGERIA, PATEK and AUTHENTIC all in one sentence?

kkwn98 · 28 December 2009, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Safetrends

I do not get it first you were going to post pictures of this watch and now you are not. Something is not right. I am not going to post stock photos of a watch and say it mine that is for sure. I have the real thing a Rolex DateJust and Date which is not the cream of the crop but at least they are real.
I just do not get it?

OK, lemme 'splain...

Teh Internetz. Srs Bizns.

IBL!

JohnEaton · 28 December 2009, 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Words like NIGERIA, PATEK and AUTHENTIC all in one sentence?

Hey JJ, Chilvary, I mean Deserted bought it...

I mean what's a little unknown Margarita guy like me to do in an economic downturn... I had to flip at least one of my watches.

Besides I had such utmost faith in Eghosa Aduwa that I felt no need to have the piece authenticated.

Welshwatchman · 28 December 2009, 06:34 AM

One for sale in the USA, $1.7m.

Who's up for a raffle?

JJ Irani · 28 December 2009, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

One for sale in the USA, $1.7m.

Who's up for a raffle?

WHOA!! That would be the Platinum version, right?

Safetrends · 28 December 2009, 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

One for sale in the USA, $1.7m.

Who's up for a raffle?

I woundered when you would jump into this mess of a thread.

:r ofl:

Glad to see you here!

Welshwatchman · 28 December 2009, 06:38 AM

Gotta keep the peace.

Welshwatchman · 28 December 2009, 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

WHOA!! That would be the Platinum version, right?

That's it baby.

5002P

JJ Irani · 28 December 2009, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

That's it baby.

5002P

Thanks, Paul......so how many of those in actual existence?

JJ

Safetrends · 28 December 2009, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

Gotta keep the peace.

I am at a loss your nose is lit up but it shows you are off line? Sneeky real sneeky but I love it!

JJ Irani · 28 December 2009, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Safetrends

I am at a loss your nose is lit up but it shows you are off line? Sneeky real sneeky but I love it!

Mods can do that - we can't!!

JohnEaton · 28 December 2009, 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

One for sale in the USA, $1.7m.

Who's up for a raffle?

I'm in

And for a fair price I can supply one. Eghosa Aduwa actually gave me quite the deal, a buy one get one free deal

Now that Chilvary, I mean Deserted has bought the first one, it's ALL gravy from here

Heck, I might even donate it if I like the cause...

Welshwatchman · 28 December 2009, 06:48 AM

If my nose flashes .... I'm lookin' in.

Don't write Sean off yet.

I've got the feeling that there may be a twist in the tale and that wrist shots will eventually be shown.

sushisummo · 28 December 2009, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Thanks, Paul......so how many of those in actual existence?

JJ

I don't know exact numbers JJ but I do own one of them. Will get a wrist shot when I get a chance to buy a new SLR camera so I can take a really good pics.......don't want to dissapoint TRF members with below average pics......

Ohhh wait just got a phone call from my advisor/lawyer not allowing me to post wrist pic....sorry guys...

Brunotheboxer · 28 December 2009, 06:58 AM

I like Deserted so all I have to offer is pics or it didn't happen.

JJ Irani · 28 December 2009, 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brunotheboxer

I like Deserted so all I have to offer is pics or it didn't happen.

Love that line of yours, Bruno!!

kkwn98 · 28 December 2009, 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

If my nose flashes .... I'm lookin' in.

Don't write Sean off yet.

I've got the feeling that there may be a twist in the tale and that wrist shots will eventually be shown.

Perhaps; perhaps not.

Even if wrist shots were eventually forthcoming, against strong legal advice of his consul (sic), and assuming genuine wrist shots which are actually his, not sure how that explains his 1999 platinum Sky Moon Tourbillon when the watch itself came into existence three years later, with the platinum version coming later still.

Still, all good fun. Certainly provided me with some comic relief.

IBL!

kyle L · 28 December 2009, 07:01 AM

I really hope Sean can come through. He's a good guy,and I would love to see pictures!

Safetrends · 28 December 2009, 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sushisummo

I don't know exact numbers JJ but I do own one of them. Will get a wrist shot when I get a chance to buy a new SLR camera so I can take a really good pics.......don't want to dissapoint TRF members with below average pics......

Ohhh wait just got a phone call from my advisor/lawyer not allowing me to post wrist pic....sorry guys...

You so funny!

esm · 28 December 2009, 07:06 AM

mmm.... Interesting. Guess there will be no further stock pix and wrist shots....

Oh well hope this thread does not get anymore -ve comments Sean.

"in before thread lock" ;-P

sushisummo · 28 December 2009, 07:09 AM

Still, all good fun. Certainly provided me with some comic relief.

IBL![/QUOTE]

Me Tooooooo........

ducatidoc · 28 December 2009, 07:17 AM

Not being familiar with PP, is it not possible that prototypes were constructed in advance of the official release year for the watch , ie. "shadow pieces" I know Panerai has been known to do this, it makes sense that PP would as well. These pieces go to high-ranking VIPs and company exec's, who occasionally and discreetly trade them around. BTW, Ft. Wayne, IN suggests that maybe Sean is in the insurance biz'.

If I'm wrong, so be it. But like Paul, I'm not ready to write Sean's version off yet.

ducatidoc · 28 December 2009, 07:22 AM

And, FWIW, I've never seen a "Non-Rolex Watch Forum" thread go to 6 pages this fast, so at least we've had some fun on a boring post-Christmas Sunday, so my hat's off to Sean for that anyway !

unknown · 28 December 2009, 07:43 AM

Is this thread still going on ?

Guys, it was funny but I think I gave enough reasons to believe this Patek story is Bullshit ( the watch is from 1999 and they did not make the 5002 in 1999 + I googled that patek reference he uses in his profile and they only thing I saw was a link to terrible fakes)

And Ducatidoc, Patek is the most respectable manufacture out there, they don't deliver some pieces 3 years before they introduce it into the market

Another thing, I looked at his older posts and noticed he only has 2 Rolexes he talks about. Being a GMT and a Daytona
Nothing wrong with these 2 watches but do you really thing a guy with two simple Rolexes buys a 1 million dollar Patek ?

You wanne see even stranger things ?

This is one of his older posts (about the daytona)

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=91984

He thinks it is a Z-series. Guys the Z is from around 2007 while the Daytona in the picture is definitely a Zenith based daytona so made before 2000.

Now look at the GMT ...
See the not SEL- links ...

Than look at this other picture he posted

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=97515

OOPS, now we have SEL
so this is NOT the same watch ...

Sean, (if this is your name) I don't care if you have a ROlex or not, it doesn't make you important or not. It's just a watch
But I'm almost sure you just took these pictures from the net and you post a lot of BS here

ducatidoc · 28 December 2009, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unknown

And Ducatidoc, Patek is the most respectable manufacture out there, they don't deliver some pieces 3 years before they introduce it into the market

Not arguing re: PP's respectability. Shadows are prototypes, that are specifically not intended to be introduced into the market. Wouldn't you think PP has, at one time or another, built a prototype ? And then, what happens to them ? It happens with PAMs, and I don't think anyone would describe O-P as disreputable.

Just sayin'.

sushisummo · 28 December 2009, 07:56 AM

Busted............

Great investigation Unknown......

Quote:

Originally Posted by unknown

Is this thread still going on ?

Guys, it was funny but I think I gave enough reasons to believe this Patek story is Bullshit ( the watch is from 1999 and they did not make the 5002 in 1999 + I googled that patek reference he uses in his profile and they only thing I saw was a link to terrible fakes)

And Ducatidoc, Patek is the most respectable manufacture out there, they don't deliver some pieces 3 years before they introduce it into the market

Another thing, I looked at his older posts and noticed he only has 2 Rolexes he talks about. Being a GMT and a Daytona
Nothing wrong with these 2 watches but do you really thing a guy with two simple Rolexes buys a 1 million dollar Patek ?

You wanne see even stranger things ?

This is one of his older posts (about the daytona)

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=91984

He thinks it is a Z-series. Guys the Z is from around 2007 while the Daytona in the picture is definitely a Zenith based daytona so made before 2000.

Now look at the GMT ...
See the not SEL- links ...

Than look at this other picture he posted

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=97515

OOPS, now we have SEL
so this is NOT the same watch ...

Sean, (if this is your name) I don't care if you have a ROlex or not, it doesn't make you important or not. It's just a watch
But I'm almost sure you just took these pictures from the net and you post a lot of BS here

Safetrends · 28 December 2009, 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unknown

Is this thread still going on ?

Guys, it was funny but I think I gave enough reasons to believe this Patek story is Bullxxxt ( the watch is from 1999 and they did not make the 5002 in 1999 + I googled that patek reference he uses in his profile and they only thing I saw was a link to terrible fakes)

And Ducatidoc, Patek is the most respectable manufacture out there, they don't deliver some pieces 3 years before they introduce it into the market

Another thing, I looked at his older posts and noticed he only has 2 Rolexes he talks about. Being a GMT and a Daytona
Nothing wrong with these 2 watches but do you really thing a guy with two simple Rolexes buys a 1 million dollar Patek ?

You wanne see even stranger things ?

This is one of his older posts (about the daytona)

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=91984

He thinks it is a Z-series. Guys the Z is from around 2007 while the Daytona in the picture is definitely a Zenith based daytona so made before 2000.

Now look at the GMT ...
See the not SEL- links ...

Than look at this other picture he posted

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=97515

OOPS, now we have SEL
so this is NOT the same watch ...

Sean, (if this is your name) I don't care if you have a ROlex or not, it doesn't make you important or not. It's just a watch
But I'm almost sure you just took these pictures from the net and you post a lot of BS here

__________________________________________________ _____________
You have to admit we not only threw this under the bus but we went over and over the dead carcus until the bones are showing!

Alcan · 28 December 2009, 08:05 AM

I'm going to reiterate my original question. If the watch is in fact a platinum 5002P, then why the stock photo of the gold cased 5002J?

If I'd just acquired a $1M+ watch, I'm pretty sure I'd have pix of the correct model. Lots and lots of pix.

WatchTimes · 28 December 2009, 08:12 AM

And what reason does your attorney give you to not post a pic????

That is just absurd!

Sorry but something seriously smells fishy around here.

28 December 2009, 06:34 AM	#95
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	One for sale in the USA, $1.7m. Who's up for a raffle? __________________ ..33

28 December 2009, 06:38 AM	#98
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	Gotta keep the peace. __________________ ..33

28 December 2009, 06:48 AM	#104
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	If my nose flashes .... I'm lookin' in. Don't write Sean off yet. I've got the feeling that there may be a twist in the tale and that wrist shots will eventually be shown. __________________ ..33

28 December 2009, 07:09 AM	#112
sushisummo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: JT Location: in a house....:) Watch: Hmmm......? Posts: 1,776	Still, all good fun. Certainly provided me with some comic relief. IBL![/QUOTE] Me Tooooooo........ __________________ Collections: -- R-O-L-E-X --AP-ROO -- P-A-N-E-R-A-I -- B-R-E-G-U-E-T -- I-W-C -- B-A-L-L -- O-T-H-E-R-S WISHLIST: Too many to list...... Member #23367

28 December 2009, 07:17 AM	#113
ducatidoc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: the doc side Watch: zenith Posts: 3,779	Not being familiar with PP, is it not possible that prototypes were constructed in advance of the official release year for the watch , ie. "shadow pieces" I know Panerai has been known to do this, it makes sense that PP would as well. These pieces go to high-ranking VIPs and company exec's, who occasionally and discreetly trade them around. BTW, Ft. Wayne, IN suggests that maybe Sean is in the insurance biz'. If I'm wrong, so be it. But like Paul, I'm not ready to write Sean's version off yet. __________________ The payments remain long after the novelty has worn off. # 26371 NAWCC Member

28 December 2009, 06:58 AM	#106
Brunotheboxer Banned Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Bruno Location: Boston/Cape Cod Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G Posts: 7,608	I like Deserted so all I have to offer is pics or it didn't happen.

28 December 2009, 07:01 AM	#109
kyle L "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: USA Watch: Rolex Explorer I Posts: 10,278	I really hope Sean can come through. He's a good guy,and I would love to see pictures!

28 December 2009, 07:06 AM	#111
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	mmm.... Interesting. Guess there will be no further stock pix and wrist shots.... Oh well hope this thread does not get anymore -ve comments Sean. "in before thread lock" ;-P

28 December 2009, 07:22 AM	#114
ducatidoc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: the doc side Watch: zenith Posts: 3,779	And, FWIW, I've never seen a "Non-Rolex Watch Forum" thread go to 6 pages this fast, so at least we've had some fun on a boring post-Christmas Sunday, so my hat's off to Sean for that anyway ! __________________ The payments remain long after the novelty has worn off. # 26371 NAWCC Member

28 December 2009, 07:43 AM	#115
unknown "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 2,907	Is this thread still going on ? Guys, it was funny but I think I gave enough reasons to believe this Patek story is Bullshit ( the watch is from 1999 and they did not make the 5002 in 1999 + I googled that patek reference he uses in his profile and they only thing I saw was a link to terrible fakes) And Ducatidoc, Patek is the most respectable manufacture out there, they don't deliver some pieces 3 years before they introduce it into the market Another thing, I looked at his older posts and noticed he only has 2 Rolexes he talks about. Being a GMT and a Daytona Nothing wrong with these 2 watches but do you really thing a guy with two simple Rolexes buys a 1 million dollar Patek ? You wanne see even stranger things ? This is one of his older posts (about the daytona) http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=91984 He thinks it is a Z-series. Guys the Z is from around 2007 while the Daytona in the picture is definitely a Zenith based daytona so made before 2000. Now look at the GMT ... See the not SEL- links ... Than look at this other picture he posted http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=97515 OOPS, now we have SEL so this is NOT the same watch ... Sean, (if this is your name) I don't care if you have a ROlex or not, it doesn't make you important or not. It's just a watch But I'm almost sure you just took these pictures from the net and you post a lot of BS here __________________ Instagram : @collectible_watches

28 December 2009, 08:05 AM	#119
Alcan 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Al Location: Way Up North Watch: your P's & Q's Posts: 10,473	I'm going to reiterate my original question. If the watch is in fact a platinum 5002P, then why the stock photo of the gold cased 5002J? If I'd just acquired a $1M+ watch, I'm pretty sure I'd have pix of the correct model. Lots and lots of pix. __________________ Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!

28 December 2009, 08:12 AM	#120
WatchTimes 2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy Location: Metro Detroit USA Watch: It's a Rolex! Posts: 5,939	And what reason does your attorney give you to not post a pic???? That is just absurd! Sorry but something seriously smells fishy around here. __________________ "You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)