ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 November 2008, 11:02 AM | #91 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 185
|
You are of course quite right - it is subjective and we can all have our own opinions but the title of the thread is "Rolex sports models too small?"
So I'll just say: Not for me (Just to be pedantic quoting directly is not necessarily quoting in entirety - which is what context is all about) |
12 November 2008, 11:05 AM | #92 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
By this picture, I take it you mean it's just right on a woman's wrist. I rest my case...40mm obviously is just too dainty for any type of 'real man'...I guess that proves the DSSD is the perfect size! Relax guys...I'm kidding.
BTW...sweet watch Richard, that's the exact one my wife picked out as her ideal Rolex. |
12 November 2008, 11:16 AM | #93 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GMT-5
Watch: SS Daytona, ND Sub
Posts: 269
|
I don't think Rolex will be influenced by other brands selling fad wristclocks. IMO, Rolexes will continue to be successful with their more traditional models.
|
12 November 2008, 11:19 AM | #94 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Tim
Location: Ohio
Watch: SS Black Daytona
Posts: 872
|
I love my 40mm Milgauss!
__________________
The greatest luxury in life is time; treasure every second. __________________ My Collection: SS Rolex M Black Daytona SS Rolex V Black Milgauss GV SS Rolex M Black Milgauss TT Rolex Z White MOP Datejust SS Rolex M Coke GMT II SS Tag Heuer Black Kirium Chronometer |
12 November 2008, 11:24 AM | #95 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Shawn
Location: Kentucky
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Certainly if the SD didn't look good I wouldn't be inclined to wear it with both bluejeans and a wetsuit.
__________________
"I get clock radio...he cannot afford. High five!" |
|
12 November 2008, 12:04 PM | #96 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: paris
Posts: 15
|
Rolex is the best brand because they don't follow fashion, wearing a big watch today is trendy or show off. Rolex matters about making the best quality watches, not being trendy. Anyway the case size should be proportional to the movment size, not a huge trendy case for a small movment... fashion victims!!!
|
12 November 2008, 01:55 PM | #97 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
Quote:
|
|
12 November 2008, 02:08 PM | #98 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 142
|
I agree and do not see rolex getting very much bigger (though I am no fan of the DSSD) as I do not see them stuffing a smaller movement in a bigger case / dial just to sell product. And I do not see rolex developing bigger movements at the drop of the hat or for fashion.
I am happy with that, I think that form should follow function and see no use for over large watches simply for fashion and suspect the big watches of today will look as silly in 10-15 years as the silly 1970's designs that few are in love with. |
12 November 2008, 11:34 PM | #99 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Dell Deaton
Location: NAWCC Museum!
Watch: Never kiss & tell!
Posts: 883
|
Obviously I'm joining this discussion late ...
The Explorer I is probably the ideal size for me personally, the Submariner Date perhaps a bit large, but fine.
Personally, I believe that the discussion here necessarily goes beyond the watches themselves, and benefits from a look at fads and fashion. Before so-called "casual days" in the work place, one's watch had to serve the dual purpose of working under the cuff of a suit there, then in support of whatever lifestyle you had outside of business. So that changed. Then there is (or was?) the change in affluence, where it was possible and practical to own multiple high-end watches. These and other factors allowed for, if not drove, larger case-sizes. Will we end up settling back? Will the next move toward retro and/or an increased competition from among vintage make smaller case sizes more attractive? Hard to say. But I do think there will be a move back, and that Rolex is just fine, if not better positioned long-term. I mean, if you think about it, and "large" isn't forever, what does it mean when today's bigger-cased watches are traded in, become their own sort of vintage? Are we talking about those trays of LED watches you see for sale at shows? Or the ones once originally sold in the early 1970s for thousands of dollars now going for only a few hundred, at best? Interesting Thread.
__________________
|
13 November 2008, 12:39 AM | #100 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
my two watches, I am happy wearing either
34mm 40mm |
15 November 2008, 04:37 PM | #101 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,638
|
Quote:
__________________
WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.