The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 November 2008, 11:02 AM   #91
petespendthrift
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 185
You are of course quite right - it is subjective and we can all have our own opinions but the title of the thread is "Rolex sports models too small?"

So I'll just say: Not for me

(Just to be pedantic quoting directly is not necessarily quoting in entirety - which is what context is all about)
petespendthrift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2008, 11:05 AM   #92
moby33
"TRF" Member
 
moby33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bisquitlips View Post
40mm is just right! Absolutely!!




By this picture, I take it you mean it's just right on a woman's wrist. I rest my case...40mm obviously is just too dainty for any type of 'real man'...I guess that proves the DSSD is the perfect size! Relax guys...I'm kidding.

BTW...sweet watch Richard, that's the exact one my wife picked out as her ideal Rolex.
moby33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2008, 11:16 AM   #93
RolexSoFla
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GMT-5
Watch: SS Daytona, ND Sub
Posts: 269
I don't think Rolex will be influenced by other brands selling fad wristclocks. IMO, Rolexes will continue to be successful with their more traditional models.
RolexSoFla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2008, 11:19 AM   #94
ttannert
"TRF" Member
 
ttannert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Tim
Location: Ohio
Watch: SS Black Daytona
Posts: 872
I love my 40mm Milgauss!

__________________
The greatest luxury in life is time; treasure every second.
__________________
My Collection:
SS Rolex M Black Daytona
SS Rolex V Black Milgauss GV
SS Rolex M Black Milgauss
TT Rolex Z White MOP Datejust
SS Rolex M Coke GMT II
SS Tag Heuer Black Kirium Chronometer
ttannert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2008, 11:24 AM   #95
ShawnK
"TRF" Member
 
ShawnK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Shawn
Location: Kentucky
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by wristworks View Post
Isn't everyone concerned with aesthetics? Would anyone here buy a high end watch that they didn't like the look of just because it is practical and have a function they need?
Yes, you are right. Looks is certainly a factor. I guess my point is that function is as important as form, and depending on what the watch is designed for it function could/should be the driving factor in design.

Certainly if the SD didn't look good I wouldn't be inclined to wear it with both bluejeans and a wetsuit.
__________________
"I get clock radio...he cannot afford. High five!"
ShawnK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2008, 12:04 PM   #96
polk
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: paris
Posts: 15
Rolex is the best brand because they don't follow fashion, wearing a big watch today is trendy or show off. Rolex matters about making the best quality watches, not being trendy. Anyway the case size should be proportional to the movment size, not a huge trendy case for a small movment... fashion victims!!!
polk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2008, 01:55 PM   #97
cody p
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by polk View Post
Rolex is the best brand because they don't follow fashion, wearing a big watch today is trendy or show off. Rolex matters about making the best quality watches, not being trendy. Anyway the case size should be proportional to the movment size, not a huge trendy case for a small movment... fashion victims!!!
agree 110% with the movement and case size needing to be on the same page!!!!
cody p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2008, 02:08 PM   #98
RsqVet
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 142
I agree and do not see rolex getting very much bigger (though I am no fan of the DSSD) as I do not see them stuffing a smaller movement in a bigger case / dial just to sell product. And I do not see rolex developing bigger movements at the drop of the hat or for fashion.

I am happy with that, I think that form should follow function and see no use for over large watches simply for fashion and suspect the big watches of today will look as silly in 10-15 years as the silly 1970's designs that few are in love with.
RsqVet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2008, 11:34 PM   #99
delldeaton
"TRF" Member
 
delldeaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Dell Deaton
Location: NAWCC Museum!
Watch: Never kiss & tell!
Posts: 883
Obviously I'm joining this discussion late ...

The Explorer I is probably the ideal size for me personally, the Submariner Date perhaps a bit large, but fine.

Personally, I believe that the discussion here necessarily goes beyond the watches themselves, and benefits from a look at fads and fashion. Before so-called "casual days" in the work place, one's watch had to serve the dual purpose of working under the cuff of a suit there, then in support of whatever lifestyle you had outside of business. So that changed.

Then there is (or was?) the change in affluence, where it was possible and practical to own multiple high-end watches.

These and other factors allowed for, if not drove, larger case-sizes.

Will we end up settling back? Will the next move toward retro and/or an increased competition from among vintage make smaller case sizes more attractive? Hard to say. But I do think there will be a move back, and that Rolex is just fine, if not better positioned long-term. I mean, if you think about it, and "large" isn't forever, what does it mean when today's bigger-cased watches are traded in, become their own sort of vintage?

Are we talking about those trays of LED watches you see for sale at shows? Or the ones once originally sold in the early 1970s for thousands of dollars now going for only a few hundred, at best?

Interesting Thread.
__________________
delldeaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2008, 12:39 AM   #100
jdc
"TRF" Member
 
jdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
my two watches, I am happy wearing either
34mm

40mm
jdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2008, 04:37 PM   #101
Al1969
2024 Pledge Member
 
Al1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivy League View Post
How can you possibly say that the Yachtmaster II is the right model?
The right model for whom? Circus workers?

__________________
WG SUB-116719
GMT MASTER II 126719
Al1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.