ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 July 2014, 12:38 AM | #121 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Loughton UK
Watch: 16610LV no Rehault
Posts: 369
|
Picture 004.jpg
Here you are Gaijin not very good at this picture lark :) The 'M' was a darker, almost British Racing Green. |
18 July 2014, 12:03 AM | #122 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
Quote:
|
|
19 July 2014, 06:43 PM | #123 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: canada
Watch: rolex explorer ii
Posts: 493
|
|
17 August 2014, 03:06 PM | #124 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: chicago
Posts: 22
|
With all due respect to your expertise in "Font Management" no product designer would ever send a file in the manner you described.
Whenever someone purchases a font set, they are usually only buying the rights to use the set. Usually only on one or two computers. Copying the font set and supplying it to a printer is copyright infringement. In order for the printer to have access to the original fonts, they’d have to buy their own copy. Gee...I wonder if a company like Rolex would let their design staff throw caution to the wind and let them knowingly violate international copyright laws by send a printer their fonts...nope. In order to ensure precision, all graphics files would be transmitted in vector file format (in the vernacular of Adobe Illustrator, this is referred to as "outlined"). The 'Rolex' font is a slight variation of Garamond (there are MANY variations of Garamond...Microsoft has one...ITC has one...Adobe has several). Anyone who works with fonts in a product design environment is well aware of slight variations across various type foundries. To even suggest that a company like Rolex, whose entire business is built upon exacting precision, would send files off to a screen printer hoping and praying that the printer had the same version of the font they used is simply ludicrous. Therefore, every change you see on a dial is, without a doubt, done with careful forethought, knowing that the collectors will take note of them. Like many on this thread, I realized early on that the 16610LV was destined to be very highly collectable. That's why I bought one of the first ones that was produced and never touched it. (see my 'for sale' listing of my NOS 16610LV "Y' Serial if you wish. It's been 10 years and my wife wants a couple of Eames lounge chairs. Easier to sell the watch and buy a pair of chairs than to listen to her gripe about it. Lucky for me, she only knows about this one watch, not the others I've been slowly accumulating) For those unfamiliar with vector art files, click here for a very basic explanation. |
17 August 2014, 11:56 PM | #125 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Watch: SS White Daytona
Posts: 1,060
|
|
8 September 2014, 12:16 AM | #126 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: SBK
Location: Singapore
Watch: means shou biao
Posts: 289
|
Papers dated..
|
8 September 2014, 12:53 AM | #127 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: SBK
Location: Singapore
Watch: means shou biao
Posts: 289
|
Good explanation...
Quote:
Oh... I bet your wife won't be reading TRF so 'fess up on what other collectibles you have in your stable ! |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.