ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rags · 28 May 2014, 10:23 PM

I'll wear anything that is 36mm to 42mm but nothing larger. I was channel surfing last night & I came upon SHOPHQ and they were selling Invicta watches. They were showing a 56mm watch that had to be almost a inch thick, it looked ridiculous. Then this guy goes on to say that it can be worn with a suit or even a tux. That's when I changed the channel LOL..

HogwldFLTR · 28 May 2014, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rags

I'll wear anything that is 36mm to 42mm but nothing larger. I was channel surfing last night & I came upon SHOPHQ and they were selling Invicta watches. They were showing a 56mm watch that had to be almost a inch thick, it looked ridiculous. Then this guy goes on to say that it can be worn with a suit or even a tux. That's when I changed the channel LOL..

Uber large watches make sense to me if 1) you have wrists the size of Andre the Giant, or 2) it is being worn over a wet suit. Other wise, no way.

alexwatchenthusiast · 28 May 2014, 10:38 PM

I have always thought watches are becoming too large.
For men any watch between 35-42mm is a fine size. I don't like how watches are getting bigger and bigger. IMO 42mm is pushing it however still acceptable- no larger though IMO

beshannon · 28 May 2014, 10:40 PM

40mm is perfect for me, especially now

ronburgundy · 28 May 2014, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dotcomakazee

... Do you have the same problem?

The DSSD, the 42mm Explorer 2, and Panerai has ruined me. The 40mm looks like a woman's watch on my wrist to me now.

I'm sad/happy.

Ty

I don't plan to buy any more 40mm models either. DSSD, EXP II, YM II, and AP ROO are all possibilities now.

KBM · 28 May 2014, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wantonebad

I also prefer larger watches however you could never mistake a 16610, 1680 or a 5512 for a ladies watch, no mater how good a woman may look wearing it. JMHO

This.

VICI · 28 May 2014, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vincent65

got a wrist-shot?

Spoken like a true TRF'r :)

improviz · 29 May 2014, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DreambreaX

This is why I buy YM 2, and now looking the skydweller

Could you post a wrist shot of your YM 2?

locutus49 · 29 May 2014, 03:04 AM

On close scrutiny, Starbucksboss's avatar looks more like a young Ian Fleming than the famed Nazi and architect of the Holocaust.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernie.H.

As I'm sure you know, size is only a concern of the 'small'.

P.s. Why do you have a picture of Reinhard Heydrich as your avatar ?

rolexnub · 29 May 2014, 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dotcomakazee

... Do you have the same problem?

The DSSD, the 42mm Explorer 2, and Panerai has ruined me. The 40mm looks like a woman's watch on my wrist to me now.

I'm sad/happy.

Ty

Nope. My wrist size is perfect for 36-39mm.
Any watch can look like a woman's watch. I've seen women wearing 42mm watch. It all depends on your thinking. Just enjoy wearing your watch

samson66 · 29 May 2014, 04:33 AM

All depends on wrist size. I have large wrists so the 41mm DJ works perfect for me. For folks with smaller wrists, that size looks too big.

Saoirse32 · 29 May 2014, 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronburgundy

I don't plan to buy any more 40mm models either. DSSD, EXP II, YM II, and AP ROO are all possibilities now.

Obviously, I'm biased due to the fact I own and love my DSSD. However, I feel I can offer some useful perspective on the matter and the original point made by the OP. I've read over the years about "wrist size" but I think it involves more than that. I have 7" wrists and am only 5'8" but have wide hands and large(r) forearms. I go about 185 lbs and have a pretty athletic build. The DSSD size (and others with its type of proportions) just look right on me and I've found it to be the most comfortable watch I've ever had the pleasure to wear daily. Over the years, I have spent much time, and unfortunately much money, on watches like the GMT II and Explorer II (39mm), and the previous generation Sea-Dweller, where I really, really tried to convince myself they "looked" or felt big enough when I knew deep down they weren't for me. I look at the DSSD as everything I've ever wanted in a Rolex, its size, looks, and feel are perfect and I wouldn't change a thing. I realize 44mm watches aren't for everyone just as though 40mm aren't either. It would appear though that the somewhat constant talk of the "big watch trend" is misplaced and that, in truth, 40mm is now and probably will be, too small for many where 42-44 is truly here to stay. In the final analysis, wear what you want and be happy with your choice

Ste_J · 29 May 2014, 04:41 AM

Big watches aren't a trend, they are a fact IMO. I was out shopping with the family yesterday and window shopping, as a complete generalisation the Rolex window display looks small when you look at omega, tag, Cartier and pretty much any other brand. Other brands tend to have a much greater variety of sizes to please everyone

anothernewphone · 29 May 2014, 04:52 AM

My buddy's girfriend wears a 42mm MK watch, bigger than my Rolex.

G Francis · 29 May 2014, 05:34 AM

And no bigger! I've been wearing my Father 's watch which is 33mm recently. Leave it on for a week and you get used to the size.

SubGunner · 29 May 2014, 05:52 AM

That's how I felt after trying on my Sub after wearing the DSSD for a month. It felt like cheap tin. It would be nice if there was a concession that 40MM and smaller is dependent on wrist size and build. I think there's just too many "skinny-wristers" that are upset that they can't pull off the DSSD.

jwill051 · 29 May 2014, 05:58 AM

40mm or maybe 41mm just right for me. Huge watches look ridiculous regardless of the person wearing them, IMHO.

tkerrmd · 29 May 2014, 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by improviz

Could you post a wrist shot of your YM 2?

Here ya go...

T. Ferguson · 29 May 2014, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ste_J

Big watches aren't a trend, they are a fact IMO. I was out shopping with the family yesterday and window shopping, as a complete generalisation the Rolex window display looks small when you look at omega, tag, Cartier and pretty much any other brand. Other brands tend to have a much greater variety of sizes to please everyone

The "trend" isn't really reflected by what watches are available but rather by what people are buying/wearing. For example, the PAM Luminor and Radiomir didn't just get big in the last decade; they've always been big.

The question of being in fashion or not is more answered by the current market shares that various size watches in the luxury category occupy compared to the last few years. Don't know the answer to that but I'm pretty confident that Rolex sells more watches every year and they don't have much to offer above 42mm. So, whatever the trend actually is, apparently Rolex is not out of fashion.

Starbucksboss · 29 May 2014, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernie.H.

As I'm sure you know, size is only a concern of the 'small'.

P.s. Why do you have a picture of Reinhard Heydrich as your avatar ?

Looks like you are peeing folks off here Bernie...wonder why?

Just for clarification it is Ian Flemmimg...as you probably don't know I'll help you - The man who created James Bond.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Starbucksboss · 29 May 2014, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernie.H.

"Very soon all watches are going to return to 34/36 mm" ..........you are quite clearly delusional.

Another pearl of wisdom Bernie...nicely done!

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Starbucksboss · 29 May 2014, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harrjaso

Haha, idk, I'm 6'1", 7.5 inch wrist and I think 40mm is great size.

Check out this video of JJ Redick discussing this very thing.

Sent from an iPhone on a secluded island

Very interesting...thanks for sharing!

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Laszlo · 29 May 2014, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VADanno

Every time I try on a President, I am surprised by the presence a 36mm watch can have on your wrist. Some day...

Yup!

Laszlo · 29 May 2014, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beshannon

40mm is perfect for me, especially now

I can hardly see that watch on your wrist. Are you sure it's okay?

Looks smashing. If I read one more post on this thread about how small and girly and cheap tin a 40mm is - I'm going to get into trouble.

Welshwatchman · 29 May 2014, 09:11 AM

OP:

The solution is to pony up a pledge and list your teeny weeny Rolex for sale here.

Don't expect a good price though. 40mm is sooooooooo last season.

fullcourt · 29 May 2014, 09:22 AM

love all the watches i have, from the 40mm daytona to my 47mm panerai 372, each for their own reasons

Bernie.H. · 30 May 2014, 04:43 AM

Starbuckboss, not only does it appear that Rolex, Breitling Omega, AP, Panerai etc have to employ you for advice in regards to the size of future watches, you have elevated yourself to forum spokesman. You obviously prefer small watches for your small wrist, that is your choice but not everyone agrees with you, in fact the majority of the watch buying public obviously don't. Ps I know exactly who the avatar is but that particular picture does look like the aforementioned, it was supposed to be light hearted.

brettpaul · 30 May 2014, 06:08 AM

Tried em' all and 40mm is the best for me!

bparone · 30 May 2014, 07:09 AM

Lots of strong opinions and only 10 posts with pictures. Seems to me there should be more to help illustrate the naysayers's point.

Starbucksboss · 30 May 2014, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bparone

Lots of strong opinions and only 10 posts with pictures. Seems to me there should be more to help illustrate the naysayers's point.

28 May 2014, 10:23 PM	#121
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,196	I'll wear anything that is 36mm to 42mm but nothing larger. I was channel surfing last night & I came upon SHOPHQ and they were selling Invicta watches. They were showing a 56mm watch that had to be almost a inch thick, it looked ridiculous. Then this guy goes on to say that it can be worn with a suit or even a tux. That's when I changed the channel LOL.. __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

28 May 2014, 10:40 PM	#124
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	40mm is perfect for me, especially now __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

29 May 2014, 09:22 AM	#146
fullcourt "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: dp Location: chicago, usa Watch: panerai Posts: 2,369	love all the watches i have, from the 40mm daytona to my 47mm panerai 372, each for their own reasons __________________ dp just living the dream chicago, usa chgo_risti on IG

28 May 2014, 10:38 PM	#123
alexwatchenthusiast Banned Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Dubai Watch: OmegaSemasterAuto Posts: 57	I have always thought watches are becoming too large. For men any watch between 35-42mm is a fine size. I don't like how watches are getting bigger and bigger. IMO 42mm is pushing it however still acceptable- no larger though IMO

29 May 2014, 04:33 AM	#131
samson66 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Downy Ocean Hon Watch: my money leaving! Posts: 13,764	All depends on wrist size. I have large wrists so the 41mm DJ works perfect for me. For folks with smaller wrists, that size looks too big.

29 May 2014, 04:41 AM	#133
Ste_J "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Ste Location: Merseyside Posts: 380	Big watches aren't a trend, they are a fact IMO. I was out shopping with the family yesterday and window shopping, as a complete generalisation the Rolex window display looks small when you look at omega, tag, Cartier and pretty much any other brand. Other brands tend to have a much greater variety of sizes to please everyone

29 May 2014, 04:52 AM	#134
anothernewphone Banned Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Bill Location: Plymouth Meeting Watch: 116520 Posts: 3,209	My buddy's girfriend wears a 42mm MK watch, bigger than my Rolex.

29 May 2014, 05:58 AM	#137
jwill051 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Jim Location: Maine & Florida Watch: 16710,116619 Posts: 540	40mm or maybe 41mm just right for me. Huge watches look ridiculous regardless of the person wearing them, IMHO.

29 May 2014, 09:11 AM	#145
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	OP: The solution is to pony up a pledge and list your teeny weeny Rolex for sale here. Don't expect a good price though. 40mm is sooooooooo last season.

30 May 2014, 04:43 AM	#147
Bernie.H. Banned Join Date: May 2012 Location: England Posts: 514	Starbuckboss, not only does it appear that Rolex, Breitling Omega, AP, Panerai etc have to employ you for advice in regards to the size of future watches, you have elevated yourself to forum spokesman. You obviously prefer small watches for your small wrist, that is your choice but not everyone agrees with you, in fact the majority of the watch buying public obviously don't. Ps I know exactly who the avatar is but that particular picture does look like the aforementioned, it was supposed to be light hearted.

30 May 2014, 06:08 AM	#148
brettpaul "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Brett Location: Bahrain, Dubai Watch: Rolex and AP Posts: 5,538	Tried em' all and 40mm is the best for me!

30 May 2014, 07:09 AM	#149
bparone "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Nashville, TN Watch: DSSD, DJII, Smstr Posts: 498	Lots of strong opinions and only 10 posts with pictures. Seems to me there should be more to help illustrate the naysayers's point.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)