|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 April 2016, 05:58 AM
|
#121 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: SS
Posts: 137
|
Prefer and purchased the No date Sub. Other than the symmetry, I didn't like the feeling of last day of the month calendar confusion.
|
|
|
|
5 April 2016, 06:16 AM
|
#122 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: James
Location: New Providence,NJ
Watch: Submariner 14060
Posts: 2,371
|
While I don't mind the cyclops on other Rolex, I really prefer the clean & symmetrical face of the "no date" submariner
|
|
|
|
|
5 April 2016, 06:24 AM
|
#123 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
I have always loved both but I just had to have the sub with the cyclops. I now am yearning for the sub no date. I just love the clean dial & how it looks.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
|
|
|
|
5 April 2016, 10:49 PM
|
#124 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: GMT -6
Watch: 114060
Posts: 212
|
Date or no date
I bought the no date because I like the clean look. I like both, but have other Rolex watches that have the date function. Wearing a no date Rolex is not a problem for me. They are all beautiful.
|
|
|
|
|
6 April 2016, 01:37 AM
|
#125 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Toronto
Watch: 114060
Posts: 50
|
Love my 114060, never needed a date with my ss watches
|
|
|
|
|
6 April 2016, 04:09 AM
|
#126 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,215
|
I bought both. Well, three.
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds... |
|
|
|
|
6 April 2016, 05:00 AM
|
#127 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Somerset UK
Watch: Submariner 14060M
Posts: 78
|
I have this uncanny knack of remembering what the day's date is.
For this reason I prefer the Submariner. scooter |
|
|
|
|
6 April 2016, 05:23 AM
|
#128 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,548
|
Bought all versions and then decided the sub no date was perfect for me and sold the rest.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
6 April 2016, 05:40 AM
|
#129 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Tudor Pelagos
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
Hence my Pelagos, can't afford the sub yet, or more realisticly don't want to rationalise collection to fit one in, but love the flat crystal and the date. I don't think any of that makes sense... Just like having a box that keeps my watches wound that cost more than my first car. Sent from my Wileyfox Swift using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
6 April 2016, 06:35 AM
|
#130 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 314
|
I preferred the look of the 14060M but disliked the old folded steel end links so ended up with the 16610 which I got in 2009 just before the new models came into AD's. Decision made!
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
6 April 2016, 06:50 AM
|
#131 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 20
|
I opted for the no date for the cleaner look of the watch and that I have a PO. Both serve their function. If it was my only watch, I would have opted for the date
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
