The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 June 2018, 02:51 AM   #121
American Jedi
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: HMFIC
Location: Ubiquitous
Watch: Rollie’s and JLC
Posts: 415
I’m non a fan of either, but if I had to choose it would be,

BLNR, followed by BLRO
American Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2018, 04:37 AM   #122
Jerrynash
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Florida
Posts: 61
Hulk
Jerrynash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2018, 04:39 AM   #123
Onequik135i
"TRF" Member
 
Onequik135i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,563
Pepsi
__________________
16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170
Onequik135i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2018, 05:07 AM   #124
yuk0nxl1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: US
Posts: 157
Pepsi on Oyster > Hulk > Pepsi on Jubilee


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yuk0nxl1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2018, 05:59 AM   #125
Castlesinthesky
"TRF" Member
 
Castlesinthesky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Dover
Watch: a few :)
Posts: 309
The Pepsi is stunning, no contest for me.
Castlesinthesky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2018, 06:00 AM   #126
Uhtred59
"TRF" Member
 
Uhtred59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Ken
Location: Europa
Watch: 216570
Posts: 693
Why didn't you make it a poll?
__________________
"My center is yielding, my right is retreating. Excellent situation, I am attacking" Ferdinand Foch
Uhtred59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 01:36 AM   #127
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
To be honest, the fit isn’t “perfect” in the pic on the left, either....it looks kind of after market with the jubilee sitting lower than the lugs.

(To be clear, I’m not calling anything fake. I’m just saying that if you blow things up enough on a computer screen, one is bound to see something one doesn’t like, but without it necessarily being a “design flaw”.)
The oyster bracelet on e.g. 116610 and 116710 sits as slow as the jubilee you mention. So that "sitting lower" is de facto a normal design standard by Rolex.

But for the new 126710BLRO - it just looks plain ugly. I love the jubilee bracelet, but they failed this time with the transition between the jubilee links and the watch case. They should have followed their normal design cue. That should be easily accomplished - if they wanted.

"Sitting lower":

Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 02:23 AM   #128
eltonbalch
"TRF" Member
 
eltonbalch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, NY
Posts: 1,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
The oyster bracelet on e.g. 116610 and 116710 sits as slow as the jubilee you mention. So that "sitting lower" is de facto a normal design standard by Rolex.

But for the new 126710BLRO - it just looks plain ugly. I love the jubilee bracelet, but they failed this time with the transition between the jubilee links and the watch case. They should have followed their normal design cue. That should be easily accomplished - if they wanted.

"Sitting lower":

I can tell this is really irritating for you, but it’s not enough to stop me from buying one. I hesitate to label it “plain ugly” since the raised area will not even be apparent to most people when it’s on the wrist. Blowing it up in large pictures makes it appear worse than it is, but, to be clear I do agree Rolex could have done a better job ensuring the profile was more pleasing aesthetically. Are you buying one in spite of that, or is it off your radar until they fix it?
eltonbalch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 02:23 AM   #129
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
I’d take the new GMT over SubLV all day long and I own SubLV which I love.
Agreed!
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 02:26 AM   #130
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
I'm not a huge fan of either but if I had to chose it'd be the SS Pepsi.
watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 02:35 AM   #131
JRT
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Rolex BLNR
Posts: 2,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Jedi View Post
I’m non a fan of either, but if I had to choose it would be,

BLNR, followed by BLRO
x2.
JRT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 02:44 AM   #132
TakeYourTime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Alex
Location: California
Watch: Changes daily
Posts: 410
Hulk would be much easier to get... if both would be available I would say Pepsi
TakeYourTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 02:56 AM   #133
Lordofrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Lordofrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
very close call. I don't love a jubilee bracelet but cant go wrong with either.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Panerai PAM 359
Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR


Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich
Lordofrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 03:51 AM   #134
ALF61
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Middle America
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashid.bk View Post
Very strange how people see things. The endlink design is by far the best iteration I've seen of the jubilee.
I happen to love this design so obviously disagree with your opinion.
Fully agree. I love the new design. Sometimes we are a tough bunch to please.
ALF61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 03:52 AM   #135
GMT Fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 137
Deception

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
The new GMT looks nice, but I can't get past the flawed design between the bracelet and lugs / watch case. The bracelet looks like it wasn't made for the new model. I can't remember to have seen such a poor design in any Rolex - ever. :(

Have no idea what happened in the design dept. this time.

I think this is an attempt at deception. He is trying to deflate the pepsi in hopes that people who are easily influenced will lose interest in the new watch. If successful, it makes the new watch more easily obtained for those who see it for what it really is: the coolest watch out there.
GMT Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 03:58 AM   #136
liuk3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,354
Hulk
__________________
"Appreciate your life!"
liuk3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 05:13 AM   #137
richamby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Ric
Location: USA
Posts: 179
Pepsi !
richamby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 05:50 AM   #138
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
The oyster bracelet on e.g. 116610 and 116710 sits as slow as the jubilee you mention. So that "sitting lower" is de facto a normal design standard by Rolex.

But for the new 126710BLRO - it just looks plain ugly. I love the jubilee bracelet, but they failed this time with the transition between the jubilee links and the watch case. They should have followed their normal design cue. That should be easily accomplished - if they wanted.

"Sitting lower":

I think it is a oversite with the new gmt (bracelet and lugs / watch case) but not as much as the original DSSD bracelet that they finally fixed. I would bet Rolex may fit the bracelet better down the road on the gmt. I agree that when you see issues like this at this level of watch, its hard to unsee it.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 05:55 AM   #139
Sal_UKSheffield
"TRF" Member
 
Sal_UKSheffield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
Explained below.

As you can see, the bracelet doesn't look like it was made for this model - at all.

It should have followed the proper design / lug curvature as the previous jubilee / super jubilee obviously managed to do.

Strapcode would have made a better job here.

Hmmmmmmm i would never have noticed that lol

Thanks for pointing it out....
Sal_UKSheffield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 05:57 AM   #140
Sal_UKSheffield
"TRF" Member
 
Sal_UKSheffield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnnyhayward View Post
For those who said LV as they didn’t like the jubilee, this may change things.

Is this not the best looking modern SS rolex?

Has my vote...

Not a fan of the jubilee tho...
Sal_UKSheffield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 06:27 AM   #141
GodZji
"TRF" Member
 
GodZji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portland
Posts: 105
See for yourself and decide.
My vote goes to Hulk.
The GMT that I want are 126715CHNR or 116719BLRO
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 35102757_10160290672390062_2861770824250032128_o1.jpg (247.0 KB, 93 views)
__________________
Current Rolex rotation. IG @bankie.bk
Submariner 116610LN, 116610LV, 116619LB & 16610LN
GMT Master 2 116759SARU, 116710BLNR & 126711 CHNR
Datejust 16233 & 116234
Daytona 116520 & 116500LN
GodZji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 07:17 AM   #142
Colin G
"TRF" Member
 
Colin G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Canada
Watch: 216570, 214270
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMT Fan View Post
I think this is an attempt at deception. He is trying to deflate the pepsi in hopes that people who are easily influenced will lose interest in the new watch. If successful, it makes the new watch more easily obtained for those who see it for what it really is: the coolest watch out there.


I seriously doubt that was the motivation behind this thread.

If it was, then good try I guess.
Colin G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 07:38 AM   #143
cmarner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Florida
Posts: 2
Hulk!
cmarner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2018, 08:24 AM   #144
justdate
"TRF" Member
 
justdate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: RJ
Location: UK Coast
Watch: PP/AP/Rolex
Posts: 1,358
Hulk is an awesome watch, but if I had to use it every day I would get sick of the green very fast, even after a few days I needed a break from the green. Not a good only watch imo.

Will see what I think of the BLRO when I get mine.
justdate is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.