ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 May 2017, 06:54 AM | #151 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,052
|
Quote:
The DSSD had just been released with the MK II dial and I fell in love with it. The font and spacing is nicer to my eye. After getting used to the weight I knew I had found something that I virtually had to commit to anyway. All the other Rolex watches went and now I have both DSSD's |
|
8 May 2017, 07:15 AM | #152 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
|
9 May 2017, 03:38 AM | #153 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: rolexforums.com
Posts: 5,426
|
Quote:
|
|
9 May 2017, 04:38 AM | #154 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
|
Those comparison photos on page 1 are EXCELLENT!! They really illustrate the thickness differences for those considering any of those watches. I had a DSSD and found it too thick on my wrist - made wearing dress shirts problematic. I see a SD43 in my future!
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono |
10 May 2017, 09:42 PM | #155 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Aventura
Posts: 14
|
Great post! has anyone asked about the dial? Is the 43 dial/hands/etc larger then sub? Sorry if addressed already
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
30 September 2017, 02:22 PM | #156 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 36
|
I sold my Sub C and picked up a SD43, and I couldn't be happier. Such a great size for a dive/sports watch. Will definitely be a classic that holds its value like Subs do.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.