![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,152
|
Aged Threads
I have seen a few old threads getting re started even though they are well over a decade old, in one case nearly two decades.
Why doesn't the forum have an auto-lock feature on threads that have gone over say 3 months without any activity? If a forum member needs an old thread re-opened for a valid reason then a request to a moderator could get the thread reset. I would guess that a lot of threads are active for a few months only before interest ceases, so why not auto close them? Just a thought. ![]()
__________________
Martin Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,707
|
Sometimes the content becomes relative again, or pricing comparisons, model reference differences, etc…
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: CASIO ROYALE
Posts: 28,897
|
Three months seems short. The mods will lock years-old threads and delete the post when we see them reactivated for no good reason, but sometimes the new posts are relevant. Also, bots sometimes answer old threads so it's a good way to catch them. Auto-locking after a specific time wouldn't be that helpful and we'd have to decide if threads were worth reopening when we got requests, etc.
__________________
_______________________ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 48,523
|
I see some of the older threads get a bump from time to time and depending on the content, I sometimes enjoy going back and reading where we were a while back.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,439
|
I sort of like them to be honest. Yes, some bumps are a bit weird if for example it’s congratulating someone on a watch purchase from 2009
![]() Others are sort of neat if they are still relevant. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,152
|
Quote:
None of the forums refuse a request to reopen a thread if it is a valid request, although some do suggest that a new thread is created. But if it isn't warranted then fine, close this thread and I'll move on.
__________________
Martin Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: CASIO ROYALE
Posts: 28,897
|
I’ll close it if someone answers it in five or ten years
![]()
__________________
_______________________ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.