ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 November 2024, 09:05 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: North America
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 304
|
Cubitus Viewing at AD
Went to my local AD in Prague today to try on the Cubitus collection. Must say the pictures online don’t do it justice. More you look at it in person, the more you appreciate the design and craftsmanship. My wrist is 6.75 and I personally prefer the bracelet version.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
15 November 2024, 10:41 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,551
|
Nice pictures.
|
16 November 2024, 12:36 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 515
|
5822P - A very Nice watch - if a little on the large size - unless you are a hefty or muscular man or like large watches like the IWC large Pilot - but otherwise I think it will do well.
It is an outlier in the PP watch style and perhaps a bit brutalist rather than Bauhaus but it looks much better in real life than the images. |
16 November 2024, 12:47 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,242
|
Thanks for the photos.
|
16 November 2024, 12:49 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,501
|
In my eyes these look awfully large in the shots despite the fact that the dangling bracelet makes the wrist look larger than it is. Once the bracelet has been properly fitted the green one will look larger still. It would wear smaller and more elegantly if they had rounded the corners but, wait, we have had exactly that since 1976.
|
16 November 2024, 02:22 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,885
|
Thanks for the pics.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
16 November 2024, 03:37 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 877
|
I'm in agreement with the other poster that this looks large on your wrist. It's not just the lug-to-lug, but the entire real estate it takes up. It wears really big, at least in the pictures.
I'm also of the opposite side of the spectrum in that the more and more I see these things on an actual wrist, I'm beginning to dislike it more. It's a really....hmmm....inelegant design. It's very sharp and brutalistic, if I can create a word. For a company known for elegance even in its sports watches, the watch looks more like Soviet era constructivist art. If that's your thing, more power to you. But it's very jarring for me. |
16 November 2024, 07:45 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,549
|
Glad you liked them.
I mean this as a light comment, but whenever I see pictures of the 5822P, the bottom of the dial reminds me of this clock:
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016) |
16 November 2024, 08:09 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,321
|
Thanks for the photos. Were the watches spoken for?
|
16 November 2024, 08:49 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 2,339
|
Just got mine today. Had the choice between green or two tone. Went with two tone.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 November 2024, 10:41 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: England
Posts: 578
|
|
16 November 2024, 03:36 PM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,325
|
|
16 November 2024, 04:57 PM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: North America
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 304
|
|
16 November 2024, 04:58 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: North America
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 304
|
|
18 November 2024, 05:36 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 432
|
Quote:
This Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
18 November 2024, 06:01 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Budapest
Posts: 186
|
I had tried one on a few weeks back, it felt huge after wearing a nautilus and more in line with the feel of a 42mm rolex in the way it spread out on the wrist. Its not objectively too big for most people but it felt oversized in comparison
|
19 November 2024, 11:38 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 251
|
Tried one on earlier today. Lovely watch, I have larger wrists and this fits well, I didn't ask to get onto the list for the SS version but on my next trip there, I think I will ask to be put down.
|
20 November 2024, 02:19 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 877
|
Just being honest, but I think the watch is too big for your wrist. It's just a really oversized watch with that square-ish shape.
|
20 November 2024, 03:03 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 254
|
I tried them on recently and they just looked enormous. Even the salesman commented that they’re too big generally - not just for my 16.5cm wrist. He was also surprised that they’d used the exact same dial as the Nautilus, as well as the exact same shade of green as the run off 5711.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
20 November 2024, 04:41 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,632
|
I’m trying to like it but it’s honestly hideous
|
20 November 2024, 05:33 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 213
|
The 5822P, in my humble opinion, is a very unfortunate looking watch.
|
20 November 2024, 06:42 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,280
|
Perhaps it’s the perspective from the pics, but looks like a clock on your wrist.
|
20 November 2024, 07:59 AM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,399
|
I keep looking at it and it isn't growing on me. To each their own but no interest in this at all, do not find it attractive at all.
|
20 November 2024, 03:28 PM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: New York City
Posts: 622
|
Have now tried it on at two different ADs, weeks apart and it is still large, clunky, inelegant & exactly the opposite of what a sporty Patek is suppose to be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzPsdkTCufs
__________________
“Own time or time will own you.” —Brian Norgard |
20 November 2024, 06:48 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 251
|
That's a fair comment. It didn't feel uncomfortable for me though. But a bigger issue that I have is a lack of funds to afford it anyway
|
20 November 2024, 11:36 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 4,262
|
|
20 November 2024, 11:36 PM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 4,262
|
|
21 November 2024, 12:00 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 515
|
|
21 November 2024, 12:37 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 526
|
I tried on all 3 versions and have to say that they wear smaller than they look, but still seem very chunky due to their shape.
It seems to me that the majority of users who write that they really like the watch, are people that already have an extensive PP collection and hence seem to somewhat be "PP-fans in general". |
21 November 2024, 12:45 AM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,501
|
Quote:
To me the 5822 dial looks unbalanced and worlds apart from the asymmetric 5712 and Lange 1 dials. The empty space in the lower left corner looks weird as if somebody is pushing the subdials to the right. This visual effect gets emphasized by the symmetric position of the outsized date which looks much better on a Lange 1 IMO. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.