![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Around
Posts: 113
|
16610LV vs 126610LV
Hey y'all,
I am on the hunt for a kermit but cannot decide if I want to pull the trigger on a flat four 16610LV or continue to ever so politely pester my AD for the new model. Thoughts and opinions on the two? Anyone who has both or one or the other, care to weigh in on what you like and don't like about each model? Thanks everyone! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: NYC
Watch: The Green Sub
Posts: 474
|
I like how the aluminum you can switch out the bezels
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Watch: YM40 Rhodium
Posts: 901
|
Green lantern for the win!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,879
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,879
|
I had a 16610LV from new, and while I prefer the build/solidity of the 6 digit models in general, I'd still take the 16610LV over the 126610LV.
The 16610LV is the original 50th Anniversary piece, and the green aluminium bezel insert is a way nicer colour than the ceramic green which can look quite milky in certain lights. Plus the 16610LV has the 3135 which I infinitely prefer over the 3235. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: USofA
Posts: 322
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 488
|
I’d definitely go for a flat 4. It has a richer history being an anniversary piece and probably the last ever metallic aluminium bezel on the sub. I don’t foresee Rolex ever going backwards since the ceramic bezel had so much success.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: ADs tray
Posts: 460
|
I have both. My 16610LV is not a flat four and I could care less. These two watches are so different it shouldn't be an either or question. Buy the original and keep waiting for the new one. Nothing I don't like about either piece and they both satisfy me in their own way.
They make a great pair! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
16610LV, super comfortable to wear daily
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,672
|
Flat 4 is close to 30k full set and 12 series is 10k retail…..big difference…i would go with the flat 4 if the money wasn’t an issue
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,834
|
The new 12 series Sub is on a completely different level in every way. You are comparing the best and most modern Sub design to a significantly older model. Not really a fair comparison. If you want a classic model then they are judged and feel entirely different.
IMO,the Sub41LV is the way to go and I have owned about them all. ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Washington
Watch: 116613LB "Bluesy"
Posts: 220
|
I really enjoy my 16610LV. I have a six digit sub also but they wear very differently. If you can find a nice 16610LV I would get that. Its is a nice wearing watch that continues to appreciate in value.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,584
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,214
|
Didn’t you just get a 124060 a couple of days ago? I’d wear and enjoy that before “pestering” your AD.
If you are buying to collect and not wear, I guess the 16610LV with flat-four is something… but seems a high mark up for a printed bezel insert on a watch if you plan to wear it. If you can buy a flat-four, you can also by a 126610LV from a grey… |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,692
|
16610LV easily for me. If you’re looking to wear and enjoy, have you considered a pointed 4?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,655
|
__________________
WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,608
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 506
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: TRF
Posts: 2,270
|
Cermit.
__________________
16570 | 16710 | 116710 | 116500 76214 | 79090 | 79030 | 79830 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Texas
Watch: Tonas
Posts: 1,099
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,662
|
Flat 4 can be a landmine.
I’d go 126610LV Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: ADs tray
Posts: 460
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: ADs tray
Posts: 460
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 99
|
Gotta go for the trilogy, 16610LV, 116610LV, 126610LV
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PE - BR
Posts: 558
|
126610lv no contest.
Maxi dial, much better clasp, endlink and bracelet, cerachrom bezel, blue chromalight, glidelock, feels like a more solid watch. But if it was my money, I'd go green all the way and get a Hulk.
__________________
126600 126603 116900 116610LV 116610LN 226570 AP15703 PAM029 HBB44 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 98
|
For me the five digit models always win...because it's an odd number of digits. If Rolex skipped and went to seven digits for the next generation I will consider them. Well, only if they move back to metallic bezels...burnt clay seems out of place to me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Gary
Location: PA
Posts: 41
|
126
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Collector
Posts: 1,482
|
For daily wear, 12 series all day. I own both and put a modern glidelock bracelet on the 16610LV which really improves the feel and comfort. But again, 12 for daily driver-
Very different watches, you have to decide if you prefer the bigger case of the 12s, ceramic, etc… or the 5-digit size, aluminum bezel, and look/feel. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dayona
Posts: 2,269
|
16610LV: perfect proportions, aluminium bezel with amazing shade that a ceramic bezel will never have. I would hunt for an unpolished mint and full set one whatever the serial instead of focusing on Flat 4 where you will pay a huge premium. If you only want a Flat4 the Y serial is the one to go (F serial less sought).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.