ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

globalmedia33 · 12 December 2010, 11:30 AM

I need help on identify the dial on this Sub. 5513. Does anyone see this kind of dial before? The Submariner line is on the bottom instead of on top. Is this a FAKE dial or this is how it was made. Please help!!!!!

globalmedia33 · 12 December 2010, 11:44 AM

I think the dial for old Sub 5513 made this way. some of the later model has the Submariner line on top.

kyle L · 12 December 2010, 11:55 AM

Looks right to me...

Now the photoshop effects on the other hand...

kyle L · 12 December 2010, 11:56 AM

globalmedia33 · 12 December 2010, 12:06 PM

Thanks guys.

mike · 12 December 2010, 12:13 PM

As a general rule the breakdown on the 5513 is,

62-68--METERS first with Submariner under (including gilt)
69-77-FEET first with Submariner under
78-89-FEET first with Submariner OVER till the end of the run. This includes gloss varients.

Of course with Rolex nothing is set in stone so crossover exists. Also replacement dials can come from differing eras (Maxis have shown this).

globalmedia33 · 12 December 2010, 12:16 PM

Thank you for the great info.

Yazo · 12 December 2010, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

As a general rule the breakdown on the 5513 is,

62-68--METERS first with Submariner under (including gilt)
69-77-FEET first with Submariner under
78-89-FEET first with Submariner OVER till the end of the run. This includes gloss varients.

Of course with Rolex nothing is set in stone so crossover exists. Also replacement dials can come from differing eras (Maxis have shown this).

Good stuff right here!!!

12 December 2010, 11:44 AM	#2
globalmedia33 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Thien Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon Watch: All Rolex Posts: 2,754	I think the dial for old Sub 5513 made this way. some of the later model has the Submariner line on top. __________________ Sub. 5513 116710LN 116610LV “I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO

12 December 2010, 12:06 PM	#5
globalmedia33 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Thien Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon Watch: All Rolex Posts: 2,754	Thanks guys. __________________ Sub. 5513 116710LN 116610LV “I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO

12 December 2010, 12:16 PM	#7
globalmedia33 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Thien Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon Watch: All Rolex Posts: 2,754	Thank you for the great info. __________________ Sub. 5513 116710LN 116610LV “I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO

12 December 2010, 11:55 AM	#3
kyle L "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: USA Watch: Rolex Explorer I Posts: 10,278	Looks right to me... Now the photoshop effects on the other hand...

12 December 2010, 11:56 AM	#4
kyle L "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: USA Watch: Rolex Explorer I Posts: 10,278

12 December 2010, 12:13 PM	#6
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	As a general rule the breakdown on the 5513 is, 62-68--METERS first with Submariner under (including gilt) 69-77-FEET first with Submariner under 78-89-FEET first with Submariner OVER till the end of the run. This includes gloss varients. Of course with Rolex nothing is set in stone so crossover exists. Also replacement dials can come from differing eras (Maxis have shown this).

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)