The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 March 2011, 08:56 AM   #1
Mr JJ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sydney
Watch: 16610N
Posts: 215
COMEX-issued Reference 5514 Rolex Submariner for the Armada de la República Argentina

Another Hybrid rarity to whet your appetite
COMEX-issued Reference 5514 Rolex Submariner
for the Armada de la República Argentina

http://www.hodinkee.com/blog/2010/4/...sued-to-t.html
Attached Images
File Type: png 2431710-6570492-thumbnail.png (131.2 KB, 246 views)
Mr JJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2011, 09:01 AM   #2
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
Awesome!
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2011, 09:25 AM   #3
Racer X
"TRF" Member
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Unknown
Posts: 999
Wow, there are a lot of variants I never knew about. Thanks for posting.
Racer X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2011, 11:47 AM   #4
Michael M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
Wow!
Michael M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2011, 03:12 PM   #5
fusionstorm
"TRF" Member
 
fusionstorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
Seems to me like a bargain for the near $50K USD it realized at auction last May....Comex and MilSub provenance coupled with higher scarcity compared to "run of the mill" Comex or MilSubs. I'm sure the owner has contacted Rolex to see if there's a location that can provide background on it the way Bexley verifies authenticity of MilSubs and Comex pieces.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090

Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M
fusionstorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2011, 03:24 PM   #6
SS Oyster
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
SS Oyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,202
That's a cool and rare sub
SS Oyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2011, 03:56 PM   #7
jedly1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,928
it only reached 50k for a reason ...and probably too much at that ...the general feeling was that whilst the piece probably was as stated ..the logfo had been added later to make it more desirable/saleable
jedly1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2011, 06:07 PM   #8
fusionstorm
"TRF" Member
 
fusionstorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by jedly1 View Post
it only reached 50k for a reason ...and probably too much at that ...the general feeling was that whilst the piece probably was as stated ..the logfo had been added later to make it more desirable/saleable
Thanks for the additional detail, sir. Definitely explains the final hammer price........
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090

Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M
fusionstorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2011, 08:09 PM   #9
Rolex116520
"TRF" Member
 
Rolex116520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: EEC
Watch: Daytona & Deepsea
Posts: 2,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by jedly1 View Post
it only reached 50k for a reason ...and probably too much at that ...the general feeling was that whilst the piece probably was as stated ..the logfo had been added later to make it more desirable/saleable
Indeed , I can not see why the COMEX name would be on the back of a ARA issue . Even if COMEX was involved with development of Rolex watches only the ones issued to COMEX personal have the COMEX logo and batch number on the case back .
COMEX was involved with the 116660 development ( the pressure simulator ) and I do not find COMEX written on the back of my deepsea .
Rolex116520 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2011, 01:39 AM   #10
fusionstorm
"TRF" Member
 
fusionstorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex116520 View Post
Indeed , I can not see why the COMEX name would be on the back of a ARA issue . Even if COMEX was involved with development of Rolex watches only the ones issued to COMEX personal have the COMEX logo and batch number on the case back .
COMEX was involved with the 116660 development ( the pressure simulator ) and I do not find COMEX written on the back of my deepsea .
Your Deep Sea is available to the general public.

The 5514 was only issued to COMEX personnel.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090

Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M
fusionstorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2011, 02:02 AM   #11
Rolex116520
"TRF" Member
 
Rolex116520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: EEC
Watch: Daytona & Deepsea
Posts: 2,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusionstorm View Post
Your Deep Sea is available to the general public.

The 5514 was only issued to COMEX personnel.
I believe that was exactly what I said and meant in my post
Rolex116520 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2011, 08:31 AM   #12
Yazo
"TRF" Member
 
Yazo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by jedly1 View Post
it only reached 50k for a reason ...and probably too much at that ...the general feeling was that whilst the piece probably was as stated ..the logfo had been added later to make it more desirable/saleable
Thanks for the info buddy!!
Yazo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.