ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

learpilot · 25 November 2011, 07:16 AM

I was lusting to try one on and when I did I was slightly dissapointed.The markers seem to be to small and the watch just didn't speak to me.Its just not for me,oh well!! my next look will be at the 41mm Datejust either a white dial with stick markers or the TT with Ivory dial and stick markers.

petesjag · 25 November 2011, 07:20 AM

Too bad.....
Im off to the ad tomorrow to see for myself...not planning on buying though...

esm · 25 November 2011, 08:08 AM

Yeah, those 216570 are abit too over rated....

(okay, I kid

)

Lol-x · 25 November 2011, 08:11 AM

As you please, I personally really like the dial/hands proportionality on the EXII42.

For me the dial is crystal clear and I can discern the time in a millisecond.

dotcomakazee · 25 November 2011, 08:48 AM

It's the cleanest/sharpest watch in the Rolex line, IMO.

Art 1 · 25 November 2011, 08:57 AM

I like them.

azguy · 25 November 2011, 09:01 AM

I'm new to all this but it's amazing that any watch can get such an equal amount of yeah

and nay's

.

After seeing it in person I would never own one-

HL65 · 25 November 2011, 10:26 AM

Like them as well...One of Rolex coolest releases in a while IMHO.

kyrolexfan · 25 November 2011, 01:10 PM

i like it! it's going over big at AD's

Wehtiko · 26 November 2011, 12:10 AM

I'm really looking forward to seeing the white one as soon as the AD gets them in.

ersnyder · 26 November 2011, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azguy

I'm new to all this but it's amazing that any watch can get such an equal amount of yeah

and nay's

.

After seeing it in person I would never own one-

I agree, it's quite surprising the strong feelings this watch elicits. I liked it quite a bit but I'm still happy with my Exp II white dial and there just wasn't enough difference to motivate me to cough up the $'s.

azguy · 26 November 2011, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ersnyder

I agree, it's quite surprising the strong feelings this watch elicits. I liked it quite a bit but I'm still happy with my Exp II white dial and there just wasn't enough difference to motivate me to cough up the $'s.

Your polar is much better in my opinion, keep it, as I know you will

Cru Jones · 26 November 2011, 04:15 AM

Well, that's the benefit of trying 'em on....I think, though, that that's the first time I've heard someone say the markers are too small.....

davidf · 28 November 2011, 01:25 AM

I tried one on yesterday and while the size is smaller than my Panerai 111, it fits weird on my wrist. I think it's because the bracelet is SS vs. the Panerai's croc strap. The Explorer's bracelet comes over the side of my wrist so it looks like it's sticking up oddly. Hard to explain, just didn't work right for me.

jcourant · 28 November 2011, 01:52 AM

Being used to my PAM 250, I was hesitant about the size (why I've never gotten a Rolex earlier), but the size is great. It feels appropriate for my 7.5" wrist and the proportionality works for me.

Watchonisto · 28 November 2011, 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Art 1

I like them.

x2

Like To Watch · 28 November 2011, 02:27 AM

Its your choice.

warren G. · 28 November 2011, 02:53 AM

I'm a huge fan.. oh well.

25 November 2011, 07:16 AM	#1
learpilot "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: gary Location: Naples,FL Watch: TT GMTII ,SUB c, Posts: 337	Just Tried on a White EXP II 42mm I was lusting to try one on and when I did I was slightly dissapointed.The markers seem to be to small and the watch just didn't speak to me.Its just not for me,oh well!! my next look will be at the 41mm Datejust either a white dial with stick markers or the TT with Ivory dial and stick markers.

25 November 2011, 08:11 AM	#4
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,559	As you please, I personally really like the dial/hands proportionality on the EXII42. For me the dial is crystal clear and I can discern the time in a millisecond. __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

25 November 2011, 08:48 AM	#5
dotcomakazee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Ty Location: Irving, TX Watch: Exp II 42mm Posts: 919	It's the cleanest/sharpest watch in the Rolex line, IMO. __________________ Rolex Explorer II 42mm • Panerai 389 47mm

25 November 2011, 10:26 AM	#8
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,991	Like them as well...One of Rolex coolest releases in a while IMHO. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

28 November 2011, 02:53 AM	#18
warren G. "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Duy Location: New Orleans, LA Watch: Speedmaster 3861 Posts: 1,925	I'm a huge fan.. oh well. __________________ De gustibus non est disputandum.

25 November 2011, 07:20 AM	#2
petesjag "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: netherlands Posts: 2,177	Too bad..... Im off to the ad tomorrow to see for myself...not planning on buying though...

25 November 2011, 08:08 AM	#3
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	Yeah, those 216570 are abit too over rated.... (okay, I kid )

25 November 2011, 08:57 AM	#6
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	I like them.

25 November 2011, 09:01 AM	#7
azguy Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: ------- Location: ------- Watch: --------- Posts: 12,609	I'm new to all this but it's amazing that any watch can get such an equal amount of yeah and nay's . After seeing it in person I would never own one-

25 November 2011, 01:10 PM	#9
kyrolexfan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Blake Merkley Location: Louisville, KY Watch: Ball Skindiver Posts: 167	i like it! it's going over big at AD's

26 November 2011, 12:10 AM	#10
Wehtiko Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Trevor Location: Edmonton, Canada Watch: Explorer II 216570 Posts: 130	I'm really looking forward to seeing the white one as soon as the AD gets them in.

26 November 2011, 04:15 AM	#13
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,261	Well, that's the benefit of trying 'em on....I think, though, that that's the first time I've heard someone say the markers are too small.....

28 November 2011, 01:25 AM	#14
davidf "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: David Location: Chicago Watch: GMTII Posts: 67	I tried one on yesterday and while the size is smaller than my Panerai 111, it fits weird on my wrist. I think it's because the bracelet is SS vs. the Panerai's croc strap. The Explorer's bracelet comes over the side of my wrist so it looks like it's sticking up oddly. Hard to explain, just didn't work right for me.

28 November 2011, 01:52 AM	#15
jcourant "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Jay Location: Mill Valley, CA Posts: 130	Being used to my PAM 250, I was hesitant about the size (why I've never gotten a Rolex earlier), but the size is great. It feels appropriate for my 7.5" wrist and the proportionality works for me.

28 November 2011, 02:27 AM	#17
Like To Watch "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Sydney Australia Posts: 1,196	Its your choice.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)