ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 November 2007, 02:13 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3
|
Noob to the forum
Hi everyone! I am new to the site but I was an owner of SS Submariner back about 2 years ago until my home was burglarized. They cleaned us out and took the watch that my wife (fiancee at the time) had given to me as an engagement gift.
Well, my wife and I are now looking to replace it and I am trying to decide between the black or the green bezel and then seeing if we can fine one at a good discount. Any suggestions or comments would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. |
12 November 2007, 04:31 PM | #2 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
Both Subs are superb. I would still consider the black Sub-date 16610 as the ultimate Rolex and I've had the pleasure of enjoying FOUR of those babies. I now have the green LV and find it very appealing too. The maxi dial is not bad although I still love the standard dial a lot. Go for whichever one that appeals to you!!! Here ya go.....take your pick!! or...
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
12 November 2007, 05:52 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Filip
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,619
|
Hi and enjoy.
|
12 November 2007, 10:45 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: GMT-5 YKZ
Posts: 285
|
Welcome...
|
13 November 2007, 12:03 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Welcome!
LOL! You'll get all kinds of comments on the pros and cons of the 16610 and the 16610LV. Both are excellent watches and share all the same internals, case, and bracelet. Many will say get the classic black while others will say the Maxi LV is the only way to fly. The adage "buy the one you prefer" is never truer when it come to any watch. I prefer the LV. The maxi dial and larger minute hand is easier to read for me in less than ideal conditions and the luminosity is better--a simple function of surface area. The green insert seems to be stretch for some as it "doesn't go with everything"---I never worried about that in a watch designed for extreme use. Certainly (with recent discussions aside) FAR fewer LVs have been made than the standard if future valuation is an interest. If you can find an LV, try it. If it doesn't sing to you the black is a wonderfull piece. |
13 November 2007, 12:23 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Welcome to TRF!
I am very sorry about hearing about your misfortune. I for my part would go for the classic Sub with the black bezel.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
13 November 2007, 01:06 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,495
|
Welcome to TRF...
If it were me, I would go out and find a good condition "F" or a "D" model, made the year of your original.. |
13 November 2007, 02:41 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3
|
Thank you for welcomes and comments. I actually like both but my local AD is charging $1,000 more for the LV. Is it worth that much more than the black bezel? The AD is willing to work with me on the black bezel, but they will not discount the LV at all.
I do like the LV more, but I am not sure if it is worth the difference. My wife and I just started looking at replacing my watch yesterday but we have no idea what are the going prices for Subs now. Can someone give me a rough idea of what the current prices are for classic Sub and LV? Thank you in advance. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.