ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 April 2013, 03:48 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Bucharest
Watch: me
Posts: 889
|
Any signs of concern ?
|
25 April 2013, 02:53 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Jason
Location: Gnashvegas
Watch: PO LM 45.5
Posts: 97
|
Tough to tell on the low res images. How about pic of case back as well.
|
25 April 2013, 03:32 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Bucharest
Watch: me
Posts: 889
|
|
26 April 2013, 09:13 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Alfred
Location: DC Metro
Watch: None
Posts: 29,368
|
fake
__________________
NEED PC HELP? ASK HERE! Watches: Patek 5205G | Patek 5167A | 16613 Serti | 116718 Green | 216570 Black | 16700 Pepsi Wish list: Patek 5726/1 | AP RG Ceramic | Patek 5712 | Patek 5130 |
26 April 2013, 09:36 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Tampa, Fl
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 313
|
Yeah. Take a pass. Too many nice ones out there.
|
29 April 2013, 10:25 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Poole, UK
Posts: 88
|
|
30 April 2013, 03:47 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6
|
I would disagree based on first glance. It seems legit to me on these pics. Rough shape, sure, but legit.
What makes you guys say fake? I have to be missing something. Any chance of getting a pic of the movement? |
30 April 2013, 05:00 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Bucharest
Watch: me
Posts: 889
|
The seller can't open the back case for a pic of the movement
|
4 May 2013, 09:39 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6
|
Can anyone point out what makes this one a fake? The thread is sorta split
|
4 May 2013, 12:02 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Jason
Location: Gnashvegas
Watch: PO LM 45.5
Posts: 97
|
|
5 May 2013, 01:48 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
I think it's real...
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
5 May 2013, 05:19 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
I too think it's real.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
5 May 2013, 07:05 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Jason
Location: Gnashvegas
Watch: PO LM 45.5
Posts: 97
|
Alex, did you pick this one up?
|
5 May 2013, 10:13 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: Tokyo
Watch: GMT 16710, 1675
Posts: 294
|
I agree it looks off to me, dial looks like a cheap fake. Plus the chrono pushes look wrong, lugs look bad, what little you can see of the back case looks wrong, there are lots of things that look off with this watch. Do you know the ref. number or cal. I would pass on this one, there are plenty of them out there to be had for reasonable price.
Here is a pic of my 145.022 year made 1982.the Omega sign is painted on the dial, the early version the Omega sign with glued in place. I can`t really see the one in your pic but it looks like the glued type Omega sign and the patina on the dial looks off for the age of those early speedmasters. image share |
5 May 2013, 11:17 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: Tokyo
Watch: GMT 16710, 1675
Posts: 294
|
double post, sorry
|
5 May 2013, 04:31 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Bucharest
Watch: me
Posts: 889
|
|
5 May 2013, 10:38 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Jason
Location: Gnashvegas
Watch: PO LM 45.5
Posts: 97
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.