ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

pilapandet · 10 January 2008, 02:58 PM

In reality, ROLEX has only three sport model, YM II, DAYTONA and GMT MASTER II. The YM II and DAYTONA are the only one on its own class. EXPLORE II is actually is GMT II with fix bezel. If you remove the 24 Hr hand and its function then you left with either SD, SUB date or YM. And your remove date. Then, all you have left is Milgauss and SUB with no date.

TARDIS · 10 January 2008, 03:02 PM

This link may help you....
http://www.rolex.com/en/index.jsp

norituck · 10 January 2008, 03:03 PM

YOUR WRONG!

Hey, I'm new to rolex but I couldn't resist.
Have a good evening
NoRiTuCk

FlyingMoose · 10 January 2008, 03:45 PM

What you're saying, basically, is that Rolex doesn't have a lot of different types of complications.

Gedanken · 10 January 2008, 04:59 PM

You're wrong.

The movement isn't the only feature that contributes to the intended sporting application of the watch.

sp3000 · 10 January 2008, 05:09 PM

Well apart from others things the SD has a totally different depth rating. So I would call that a big enough "thing" to say it's different.

SPACE-DWELLER · 10 January 2008, 06:39 PM

You're right. That's why I flipped the SD. After all, it was just a ladies' dress watch.

Welshwatchman · 10 January 2008, 10:37 PM

Yep, you are indeed quite wrong.

rpryan55 · 10 January 2008, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

You're right. That's why I flipped the SD. After all, it was just a ladies' dress watch.

Texsubmariner · 10 January 2008, 11:34 PM

The Exp/GMT II (and now the GMT IIc) have different movements (3185/3186) compared to the SD/Sub/YM 40mm. And the Sub ND has a different movement as well. True, these movement are somewhat similar since they are made in house by Rolex, but they are indeed different movements. Just like ETA's movements are similar, but you cannot say that Omega, Breitling, and other brands have only 1 sports model.

Also, like mentioned above, the SD, Sub, and YM are constructed differently, reflecting different depth ratings.

So, yes, you would be wrong.

10 January 2008, 02:58 PM	#1
pilapandet "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Alexander Location: Anaheim Hills, CA Watch: GMT Master II SS Posts: 425	Tell me that I am wrong. In reality, ROLEX has only three sport model, YM II, DAYTONA and GMT MASTER II. The YM II and DAYTONA are the only one on its own class. EXPLORE II is actually is GMT II with fix bezel. If you remove the 24 Hr hand and its function then you left with either SD, SUB date or YM. And your remove date. Then, all you have left is Milgauss and SUB with no date.

10 January 2008, 04:59 PM	#5
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	You're wrong. The movement isn't the only feature that contributes to the intended sporting application of the watch. __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

10 January 2008, 06:39 PM	#7
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	You're right. That's why I flipped the SD. After all, it was just a ladies' dress watch. __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

10 January 2008, 10:37 PM	#8
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	Yep, you are indeed quite wrong. __________________ ..33

10 January 2008, 03:02 PM	#2
TARDIS "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Queensland, AUST Posts: 2,003	This link may help you.... http://www.rolex.com/en/index.jsp

10 January 2008, 03:03 PM	#3
norituck Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Tucson,AZ USA Watch: Black Submariner Posts: 102	YOUR WRONG! Hey, I'm new to rolex but I couldn't resist. Have a good evening NoRiTuCk

10 January 2008, 03:45 PM	#4
FlyingMoose "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: New York, USA Posts: 502	What you're saying, basically, is that Rolex doesn't have a lot of different types of complications.

10 January 2008, 05:09 PM	#6
sp3000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Sam Location: Australia Watch: Rolex Sea-Dweller Posts: 86	Well apart from others things the SD has a totally different depth rating. So I would call that a big enough "thing" to say it's different.

10 January 2008, 11:34 PM	#10
Texsubmariner "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Khanh Location: Texas Watch: SSGMTc Posts: 1,227	The Exp/GMT II (and now the GMT IIc) have different movements (3185/3186) compared to the SD/Sub/YM 40mm. And the Sub ND has a different movement as well. True, these movement are somewhat similar since they are made in house by Rolex, but they are indeed different movements. Just like ETA's movements are similar, but you cannot say that Omega, Breitling, and other brands have only 1 sports model. Also, like mentioned above, the SD, Sub, and YM are constructed differently, reflecting different depth ratings. So, yes, you would be wrong.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)