ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 July 2014, 05:33 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DC
Posts: 1
|
Wider Bracelet For Submariner?
Hi, Everyone. I'm new to Rolex and new to this forum. My wife recently gave me a Submariner for our wedding anniversary. I love the size and look of the face, bezel, etc. My only complaint is that the bracelet tapers to a noticeably thin width at the clasp. I would love it so much more if the bracelet was the same width from the lugs to the clasp. Does such a bracelet exist? Thanks in advance for any help!
|
3 July 2014, 08:51 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
|
No, such a Rolex bracelet does not exist
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
3 July 2014, 09:01 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,166
|
It's the 20mm to 16mm taper that make the classic Oyster bracelet so damn comfortable.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
3 July 2014, 09:37 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 218
|
If it helps, the bracelet taper won't be noticeable to anyone but you. And like Dan said, thats what makes it so comfy.
|
3 July 2014, 09:39 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 889
|
I agree with you. I think the problem is the lugs got wider which also works to make the bracelet seem too narrow not only where it meets the lugs but also all the way around. I found the same issue and sold my sub-c. Replaced by SD-c.
|
3 July 2014, 09:40 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
If you prefer a non-tapering bracelet, check out the Tudor Pelagos because the bracelet does not taper very much at all, giving it a much beefier appearance by the clasp.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
3 July 2014, 10:22 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
|
3 July 2014, 10:38 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PNW USA
Watch: 114060
Posts: 516
|
Tapered bracelet is a luxury. Embrace it ;)
|
3 July 2014, 10:50 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
No congrats and enjoy
|
3 July 2014, 11:06 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: US
Posts: 408
|
Nope. Enjoy
|
3 July 2014, 11:07 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Greenville, SC
Watch: 116610,16710, Sbgm
Posts: 44
|
No. You could always trade it in for an Omega Planet Ocean; their bracelets dont taper. However, having had both models I believe the Sub to be more comfortable because of the Rolex oyster bracelet. I recently purchased the Sub C date and have found the bracelet to be even more comfortable due to the glidelock clasp!
|
3 July 2014, 03:28 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
|
3 July 2014, 03:35 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
|
I agree. A tapered bracelet is a more complex thing and requires some excellent machining. It's art and functionality
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
3 July 2014, 08:43 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Shane
Location: Minnesota
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,125
|
Totally understand your issue. You have an awesome watch there. You can try other watches to get a bracelet you like but they are not Rolex. Maybe try some strap combos. So many guys here use them. You might could even have one custom made to your specs.
|
3 July 2014, 09:09 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 116610 , 16233
Posts: 1,802
|
Please don't change it
Give it a try for a little while
__________________
|
3 July 2014, 10:04 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,447
|
Honestly, you will get used to the look.
If you don't think that's possible, you can always go with the huge list of strap options in the aftermarket.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
3 July 2014, 10:21 PM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
Dan is exactly correct..The oyster bracelet is the most comfortable bracelet I've ever worn.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
4 July 2014, 01:09 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Anywhere but here
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 259
|
Its funny, when ever I see a watch with a bracelet that is as thick as the lugs I immediately think "Cheap bling watch" I see the taper as elegance as well as comfort. Rolex knows what they are doing.
|
4 July 2014, 01:50 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
Quote:
OP give it a try for a little while, I am willing to bet that the comfort will win over the taper effect in your mind. |
|
4 July 2014, 02:15 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
|
Or try a NATO band; they don't taper at all.
Either way, welcome to TRF...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here... Lug Hole Lover® |
4 July 2014, 02:20 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
|
|
4 July 2014, 02:33 AM | #22 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
I absolutely love the taper on my bracelets.... I think you will grow to love it too. It's so comfortable and I think very smart looking
Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum |
4 July 2014, 02:36 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
Welcome and congrats
|
4 July 2014, 02:59 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Anywhere but here
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 259
|
|
4 July 2014, 06:34 AM | #25 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,447
|
Quote:
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
17 October 2017, 07:52 PM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
Totally disagree with wider bracelets being cheap. Especially when Tudor has a model bracelet that doesn't taper. The Sub clasp is way too narrow, at only 18mm (16mm on the bracelet). I'm looking into buying a SDDS, and such a narrow clasp bothered me when I first tried it on. But I wouldn't wear it with a leather strap or nato. Let's see if I get used to it... Also, don't kill me, but I would love if I could have the MilSub sword hands on the SDDS. Not much of a fan of mercedes hands... |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.