ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 September 2014, 08:04 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Ireland
Watch: 5513,16610
Posts: 217
|
5513 3.23 mil - meters first Question
Below is a 5513 that I am interested in
Issue is that I am confused, I have investigated the 5513 and discovered the following: 1960-66 (meters first - GILTS including the "Bart Simpson" used to discribe the Crown) 1967-69 (meters first (in white) 1970-1973 (the start of the feet firsts) 1973-83 (the Maxi dials (feet first) of which I think there are 5 known favours) 1984-90 (the glossy dials) This is being represented as a 5513 3.23Mil year 1973. Can someone confirm that this could be an original meters first with this serial and year? I am hoping to contact the seller tomorrow for additional photos etc. Thanks in advance |
1 September 2014, 08:13 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
|
A 3.2 mil watch shouldn't be meters first
|
1 September 2014, 08:20 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Ireland
Watch: 5513,16610
Posts: 217
|
|
1 September 2014, 10:14 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
red flag... is this on ebay?
|
1 September 2014, 06:26 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Ireland
Watch: 5513,16610
Posts: 217
|
|
1 September 2014, 11:11 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
impossible
|
2 September 2014, 01:27 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,132
|
Replaced dial. Brick and mortar in Brussels (who should know better....): click .
And this what they say on their site: Quote:
|
|
2 September 2014, 02:27 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jerimiah
Location: NYC
Watch: 5513 Meters 1st
Posts: 669
|
That dial was not born in that case. Also, from the angle of the photo looks like the lume plots have been washed.
|
4 September 2014, 07:55 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
|
|
5 September 2014, 06:56 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: John Baker III
Location: Spring,Texas
Watch: 1971 Red Sub
Posts: 2,222
|
Have the jeweler confirm the serial number; could be off by 1 million...
Nice insert with a FF kissing 4..... Don't give up just yet....but the ser # doesn't match as described...
__________________
As I've grown older, I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing off everyone is a piece of cake. |
6 September 2014, 08:33 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 1
|
at what serial should meters first end and ft. first start? I have a 2.2mill 5513 with ft. first.
|
7 September 2014, 06:48 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 268
|
|
9 September 2014, 02:38 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,196
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.