ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 January 2017, 08:42 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 19
|
Jubilee for 16750
Hello people.
I am new here, and hope I am doing things the right way :) One of the favorites in my collection is my birthyear(1984) GMT 16750. Its on its original oyster bracelet, but the more I think about it, the more I feel that jubilee is the nicest bracelet for older GMTs. My question is: What ref jubilee bracelet will fit on my watch? It doesnt have to be from the correct year, since I already have the original oyster. It just has to fit and look good. Seems like 62510H with 550 endlinks is the correct way to go. But 550s are so hard to find, and the price is therefore pretty high. I read on different salesposts that 455(DJ36) and 555(DJ36) will work, and also 502x. Can I please get this confirmed from you experts? Thanks alot if someone can help me with some answers. Have a good week end |
8 January 2017, 10:24 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 731
|
Hello and welcome here!
While far from an expert (and I'm sure "Springer" and other experts will weigh in shortly...if it were me I would be patient and seek out a correct Jubilee with the correct end links for such a nice GMT specimen! The correct setup I ore expensive but will enhance your watch's value accordingly...just my .02 as I recently dealt with the same issue and decided to source a correct GMT Jubilee and am glad I did. |
8 January 2017, 10:36 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
|
Welcome to the forum. Beautiful watch!
A standard DJ jubilee will fit but spring bars are 1.8 instead of 2.0mm. I have used a 62510H with 455 ends and shoulder less 1.8's on a 1675 and it worked fine. Ideally you want a 62510 with a 55 stamped on the last link near the end link and 550's. These were made for the GMT and take 2mm bars. They are hard to source and expensive but ideal. My GMT was an MKI so I used an old folded jubilee from the late 60's with 55 end links. It took 2mm bars and was the most comfortable bracelet I have ever used. It would also work on yours but is not period correct.
__________________
Judge Smails: Ty, what did you shoot today? Ty: Oh, Judge, I don't keep score. Judge Smails: Then how do you measure yourself with other golfers? Ty: By height. |
8 January 2017, 01:18 PM | #4 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
|
Quote:
Additionally, the older 6251 SWISS Jubilee does not have the 50 designation stamped on the last link - the are no identifying number stamps on the last link of a 6251 Jubilee. On a vintage GMT utilizing the 6251 Jubilee, the correct end links would be marked 50 not 55. The Datejust and similar models utilized the 55 end links with the 6251 Jubilee. I see several sellers claiming the 55 end links are correct for the GMTs and, while they will work, the GMT used the 50 end links with a 6251 Jubilee. (For the doubters here, it is also listed this way in the Rolex parts books.) Hope this clears up some of the confusion regarding the GMT Jubilees. Below is a D link 62510 Jubilee for a GMT 16750 and a 6251 Jubilee for a GMT 1675.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
9 January 2017, 06:37 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 19
|
Wow, this forum delivers on my very first post. Thanks alot for your helpful expertise guys.
I guess I will try to be patient and wait for some 550s. |
9 September 2018, 09:51 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: nyc
Posts: 14
|
I've got a 16750 on a 62510 with 555 end links and it fits and looks great
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.