ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SROB · 20 April 2019, 12:48 PM

I own Sub C, that I love. Gets the most wear. I like the YM everose, are these two overlaps... need for both is a stretch?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

ltmgeller · 20 April 2019, 12:50 PM

Two totally different watches. Go for the gold.

timeisfathaoftruth · 20 April 2019, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SROB

I own Sub C, that I love. Gets the most wear. I like the YM everose, are these two overlaps... need for both is a stretch?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

No way, different enough to enjoy both!

Likestheshiny · 20 April 2019, 02:35 PM

Yes, they're really, really similar. Let's not pretend otherwise. But you should still totally get both if you want.

I have a BLNR and sooner or later I'll pop for a two-tone sub. Yes, it's basically the same watch in a different colour with different bezel markings, but who cares? And at least the YM is a little more different from a sub than a GMT is.

(The rose gold YM has also been in my crosshairs. It's a lovely watch.)

timeisfathaoftruth · 20 April 2019, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Likestheshiny

Yes, they're really, really similar. Let's not pretend otherwise. But you should still totally get both if you want.

I have a BLNR and sooner or later I'll pop for a two-tone sub. Yes, it's basically the same watch in a different colour with different bezel markings, but who cares? And at least the YM is a little more different from a sub than a GMT is.

(The rose gold YM has also been in my crosshairs. It's a lovely watch.)

Are you saying that a BLNR and a TT sub are basically the same watch????

csaltphoto · 20 April 2019, 02:42 PM

I go back and forth. The YM is pretty different though. But yeah, has 3 hands, tells the time... Much more distinctive and unusual in the wild. Smoother and really comfy case.

aphil · 20 April 2019, 03:34 PM

So I also have a sub C, but I am a big fan of the YM TT in RG with the black dial.

Personally I don't think there's redundancy between both for the following reasons:
1- I actually like the case on the YM more than the sub; the curved sides of the case and the smaller lugs make it look a lot sleeker
2- the matte black dial on YM is outstanding in person; I also prefer it to the shiny black dial of the sub. The contrast of the RG hour markers against the flat black is a detail you need to see in person to appreciate
3- The shade of rose gold is really nice and makes it really stand out in a sea of YG
4- it has the newer 3235 movement with 70 hours power reserve as opposed to the older movement on the sub

I think I will get it at some point, but I have other pieces I need to get first

ppalasthira · 20 April 2019, 03:38 PM

Two totally different watches imho.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

20 April 2019, 12:48 PM	#1
SROB "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: US Posts: 110	Yachtmaster - Sub I own Sub C, that I love. Gets the most wear. I like the YM everose, are these two overlaps... need for both is a stretch? Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

20 April 2019, 12:50 PM	#2
ltmgeller 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: New York Watch: Rolex Posts: 22,521	Two totally different watches. Go for the gold. __________________ Oh, look at the time... Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019

20 April 2019, 03:34 PM	#7
aphil "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Location: United States Watch: 116610LN Posts: 287	So I also have a sub C, but I am a big fan of the YM TT in RG with the black dial. Personally I don't think there's redundancy between both for the following reasons: 1- I actually like the case on the YM more than the sub; the curved sides of the case and the smaller lugs make it look a lot sleeker 2- the matte black dial on YM is outstanding in person; I also prefer it to the shiny black dial of the sub. The contrast of the RG hour markers against the flat black is a detail you need to see in person to appreciate 3- The shade of rose gold is really nice and makes it really stand out in a sea of YG 4- it has the newer 3235 movement with 70 hours power reserve as opposed to the older movement on the sub I think I will get it at some point, but I have other pieces I need to get first __________________ Current collection: 116610 LN, 126710 BLNR, JLC Master Geographic, Breitling SO A17364, Omega Seamaster 1951 cal. 351, Movado circa 1950's Up next: 116500 (white dial) Grails: PP 5205G, PP 5712, PP 5230, Daytona 116519

20 April 2019, 02:35 PM	#4
Likestheshiny "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: _ Posts: 1,877	Yes, they're really, really similar. Let's not pretend otherwise. But you should still totally get both if you want. I have a BLNR and sooner or later I'll pop for a two-tone sub. Yes, it's basically the same watch in a different colour with different bezel markings, but who cares? And at least the YM is a little more different from a sub than a GMT is. (The rose gold YM has also been in my crosshairs. It's a lovely watch.)

20 April 2019, 02:42 PM	#6
csaltphoto "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Location: US Watch: sub Posts: 2,428	I go back and forth. The YM is pretty different though. But yeah, has 3 hands, tells the time... Much more distinctive and unusual in the wild. Smoother and really comfy case.

20 April 2019, 03:38 PM	#8
ppalasthira Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: ASK Watch: SubC.5711.D500 Posts: 2,236	Two totally different watches imho. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)