The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 July 2019, 01:06 AM   #1
Boothy84
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 116710 BLNR, DJ
Posts: 210
WG Daytona 116509

Hi all,

Interested to hear your thoughts on this reference?

I'm toying with the idea of getting rid of my BLNR & Datejust and just having 1 watch, albeit a more expensive piece, most likely precious metal. I think It'll be white gold as I don't want to be too flashy with having a yellow or rose gold piece as my one and only.

Could somebody with a lot more knowledge and experience maybe throw some other ideas out there?

I don't want to be paying over £20,000 FYI.

Thank you
Boothy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 02:28 AM   #2
Solo118
2024 Pledge Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,087
One of the best watches I have ever had. If you like the GMT that you have already, the 116719 is a fantastic option as well.
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 02:36 AM   #3
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
This sort of thing?
They are a lot nicer to wear than steel, you’d probably like it. However the crazed inflation of steel models is now pushing up prices of the gold models too. Act quickly...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 03:01 AM   #4
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boothy84 View Post
Hi all,

Interested to hear your thoughts on this reference?

I'm toying with the idea of getting rid of my BLNR & Datejust and just having 1 watch, albeit a more expensive piece, most likely precious metal. I think It'll be white gold as I don't want to be too flashy with having a yellow or rose gold piece as my one and only.

Could somebody with a lot more knowledge and experience maybe throw some other ideas out there?

I don't want to be paying over £20,000 FYI.

Thank you
I like the 509, but don’t love it. I feel it’s too monotone and vastly prefer the 116519LN - the ceramic bezel and contrasting oysterflex bracelet make all the difference with this dial. It’s also much more conducive to daily wear. Id go 519 over 509
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 03:03 AM   #5
oldman2005
"TRF" Member
 
oldman2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
Personally I'd stretch a little bit and go for the ice blue dial platona.

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/ha...etails-pricing
oldman2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 03:47 AM   #6
Boothy84
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 116710 BLNR, DJ
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterskinner View Post
This sort of thing?
They are a lot nicer to wear than steel, you’d probably like it. However the crazed inflation of steel models is now pushing up prices of the gold models too. Act quickly...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


I wish this was in my price range. If it was this would be THE watch I’d instantly buy, she is a beauty.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Boothy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 03:51 AM   #7
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,437
It's an amazing watch with some killer dials. IMO the steel panda is right there with the glacier platinum dials in terms of the best dials for Daytonas for moderns.
sensui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 05:05 AM   #8
kbutler1
"TRF" Member
 
kbutler1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Colorado
Watch: This one
Posts: 633
It’s a grail watch for me, love this dial




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kbutler1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 05:15 AM   #9
AlexDimi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: EU
Posts: 38
116509 seems to be a heavy watch comparing to 116519ln.
Big advantage of 116509 is that you buy a WG bracelet instead of OF.

I am also between the two and do not know which one to focus. In this price level wrong selection is costly.
AlexDimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 06:34 AM   #10
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,800
I have both the 116509 (currently at Rolex UK) and the 116519.

Obviously the 519 is lighter in weight to wear, but I wear the 509 more. Knowing what I know now, I wouldn't have bought the 519 as I not keen on the built in end links, I would have bought another 509 and swapped the bracelet for a leather strap without end links. I've tried on the blue dial version as above and I have to say I really like it and can see me getting one in the future.

I also have SS versions of the watch, both 16520 and 116520s and the different weights are quite noticeable and I think make the different models unique to each other to wear.
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 07:08 AM   #11
mattskybeat
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Matt
Location: Lytham UK
Watch: Sky Dweller
Posts: 169
I pulled the trigger a few months ago and I have not had it off my wrist since. The blue dial in the sunshine is truly amazing. I have a few other watches but I can’t bring myself to take this beauty off





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
mattskybeat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 07:31 AM   #12
Soleless Shoes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Rich
Location: United States
Posts: 302
I believe the 116509 would be an ideal piece for a one watch collection. All wrist are unique but most find the shape and weight distribution of the Daytona (both SS and PM) to be very comfortable. I do as well.
Soleless Shoes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 09:06 AM   #13
Mr.Rolex1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Mike
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 1,197
Take the upgrade...thank me later
Mr.Rolex1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 09:13 AM   #14
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Rolex1 View Post
Take the upgrade...thank me later
this
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 11:05 AM   #15
BobDyl
"TRF" Member
 
BobDyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 917
I've owned a couple 116509 over the years. They are great watches but not without disadvantages.

Pros:
- The weight
- The full gold bracelet (I'm not an OF fan)
- The luster (esp white gold, it's just fantastic)
- The slightly larger case/lugs (not on the YG version). Gives it more wrist presence than the SS Daytonas. Actually makes a noticeable difference and we're talking a mere mm or so here or there.

Cons:
- It's soft and will show wear no matter how careful you are. It will, trust me.
- The bezel is especially vulnerable. Never, ever polish that bezel, it will look like hell. It has a sharp bevel on the edge when new. If rounded, it's been polished. And unfortunately, replacement bezels are I understand north of $3K from Rolex. We are a bit spoiled by 904L steel which stays relatively crispy even with serious abuse.
- The above point prevents the 116509 from being a 1-watch/daily IMHO. It's a great companion to a LN or BLNR though that could be a daily.

Not saying don't get it. It's beautiful, especially brand new. But be aware of a limitation or two. Best of luck.
BobDyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 08:01 PM   #16
Boothy84
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 116710 BLNR, DJ
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDyl View Post
I've owned a couple 116509 over the years. They are great watches but not without disadvantages.

Pros:
- The weight
- The full gold bracelet (I'm not an OF fan)
- The luster (esp white gold, it's just fantastic)
- The slightly larger case/lugs (not on the YG version). Gives it more wrist presence than the SS Daytonas. Actually makes a noticeable difference and we're talking a mere mm or so here or there.

Cons:
- It's soft and will show wear no matter how careful you are. It will, trust me.
- The bezel is especially vulnerable. Never, ever polish that bezel, it will look like hell. It has a sharp bevel on the edge when new. If rounded, it's been polished. And unfortunately, replacement bezels are I understand north of $3K from Rolex. We are a bit spoiled by 904L steel which stays relatively crispy even with serious abuse.
- The above point prevents the 116509 from being a 1-watch/daily IMHO. It's a great companion to a LN or BLNR though that could be a daily.

Not saying don't get it. It's beautiful, especially brand new. But be aware of a limitation or two. Best of luck.
Thanks for your input, with me looking at watches around 2008-2012 what are the tell tale signs of polishing the bezel? I've never actually handled a Daytona in person so I wouldn't know.

Cheers
Boothy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 08:14 PM   #17
glamorama
"TRF" Member
 
glamorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDyl View Post
I've owned a couple 116509 over the years. They are great watches but not without disadvantages.

Pros:
- The weight
- The full gold bracelet (I'm not an OF fan)
- The luster (esp white gold, it's just fantastic)
- The slightly larger case/lugs (not on the YG version). Gives it more wrist presence than the SS Daytonas. Actually makes a noticeable difference and we're talking a mere mm or so here or there.

Cons:
- It's soft and will show wear no matter how careful you are. It will, trust me.
- The bezel is especially vulnerable. Never, ever polish that bezel, it will look like hell. It has a sharp bevel on the edge when new. If rounded, it's been polished. And unfortunately, replacement bezels are I understand north of $3K from Rolex. We are a bit spoiled by 904L steel which stays relatively crispy even with serious abuse.
- The above point prevents the 116509 from being a 1-watch/daily IMHO. It's a great companion to a LN or BLNR though that could be a daily.

Not saying don't get it. It's beautiful, especially brand new. But be aware of a limitation or two. Best of luck.
Thanks for sharing the experience of actually owning and using one. Have had similar thoughts as OP, maybe not one and only but as daily.

One thing though, I got a quote of €1300 just for the bezel without labour but if you do it together with a service I guess its included.
glamorama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2019, 08:15 PM   #18
glamorama
"TRF" Member
 
glamorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbutler1 View Post
It’s a grail watch for me, love this dial


glamorama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 02:22 AM   #19
BobDyl
"TRF" Member
 
BobDyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boothy84 View Post
Thanks for your input, with me looking at watches around 2008-2012 what are the tell tale signs of polishing the bezel? I've never actually handled a Daytona in person so I wouldn't know.

Cheers
You are welcome. I've attached a couple pics from the Internet to show a new, crispy example vs. a polished bezel. It's pretty obvious - neither the bevel nor the engraved and lacquered numbers survive polishing without looking "melted" (the silver dialed one). If it looks at all like a Salvador Dali painting to you, it's been polished. A high percentage of 116509 listings proclaim "like new" when they've clearly been overpolished. Hold out for a good one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by glamorama View Post
Thanks for sharing the experience of actually owning and using one. Have had similar thoughts as OP, maybe not one and only but as daily.

One thing though, I got a quote of €1300 just for the bezel without labour but if you do it together with a service I guess its included.
I stand corrected! Thanks for the info.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg new.jpg (145.9 KB, 1415 views)
File Type: jpg polished.jpg (92.7 KB, 1412 views)
BobDyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 02:28 AM   #20
Calatrava r
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDyl View Post
You are welcome. I've attached a couple pics from the Internet to show a new, crispy example vs. a polished bezel. It's pretty obvious - neither the bevel nor the engraved and lacquered numbers survive polishing without looking "melted" (the silver dialed one). If it looks at all like a Salvador Dali painting to you, it's been polished. A high percentage of 116509 listings proclaim "like new" when they've clearly been overpolished. Hold out for a good one.



I stand corrected! Thanks for the info.
My uneducated stab in the dark guess is that next year they go with ceramic dials on the pm models. Really a shame but makes a lot of sense to me.
Calatrava r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 02:36 AM   #21
GMTSpas
"TRF" Member
 
GMTSpas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: SD43,YMRG,DYTNA500
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterskinner View Post
This sort of thing?
They are a lot nicer to wear than steel, you’d probably like it. However the crazed inflation of steel models is now pushing up prices of the gold models too. Act quickly...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
This is my favorite Daytona model next to the green dial/yg 116508
GMTSpas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 03:10 AM   #22
BobDyl
"TRF" Member
 
BobDyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calatrava r View Post
My uneducated stab in the dark guess is that next year they go with ceramic dials on the pm models. Really a shame but makes a lot of sense to me.
You're probably right. It's a tradeoff - they would lose some of the aesthetic but wow it would be way tougher and more usable as a daily...
BobDyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 03:31 AM   #23
Boothy84
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 116710 BLNR, DJ
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDyl View Post
You are welcome. I've attached a couple pics from the Internet to show a new, crispy example vs. a polished bezel. It's pretty obvious - neither the bevel nor the engraved and lacquered numbers survive polishing without looking "melted" (the silver dialed one). If it looks at all like a Salvador Dali painting to you, it's been polished. A high percentage of 116509 listings proclaim "like new" when they've clearly been overpolished. Hold out for a good one.







I stand corrected! Thanks for the info.

What are your thoughts on this bob? This is the watch. It’s a 2005 just been back from RSC. How does the bezel look? It looks slightly rounded to me.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Boothy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 03:34 AM   #24
BobDyl
"TRF" Member
 
BobDyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boothy84 View Post
What are your thoughts on this bob? This is the watch. It’s a 2005 just been back from RSC. How does the bezel look? It looks slightly rounded to me.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That looks overpolished to me.
BobDyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 03:40 AM   #25
Boothy84
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 116710 BLNR, DJ
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDyl View Post
That looks overpolished to me.


Would this personally put you off? With my budget being around £19k I can only assume most WG 10 year old Daytona’s will be the same?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Boothy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 04:24 AM   #26
BobDyl
"TRF" Member
 
BobDyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boothy84 View Post
Would this personally put you off? With my budget being around £19k I can only assume most WG 10 year old Daytona’s will be the same?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't know the UK market, but for approx USD $24K I believe you could get something from the era in better cosmetic condition. To be fair, it's hard to see from the one photo and I guess you could take into account the RSC service, so internally you have a new watch. Personally I'd probably keep looking but only you can answer that question...
BobDyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 04:29 AM   #27
AH0RSEY
"TRF" Member
 
AH0RSEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: Harrogate
Watch: OUT !!!!
Posts: 829
i purchased a 116509 from watchfinder just back from RSC Feb this year. its fantastic - its heavier than you think, so make sure you try one on first and older models have the smaller clasp, so its NOT as comfortable as the newer bracelet models....i still have a 600 LN and I wear the 509 daily! its a scratch magnet - get over it! its a watch, itll scratch and RSC will fix it in 5 years or so if you really ding it.

Have to say I flipped a 116523 to get it - dont even compare, I LOVE the stealth of the WG over the Bicolour

oh - I have to say - the prices are going up and up.... I can tell you now, that I got mine from WF at £16k.... F serial, 1 month out of RSC and I although it didnt have a rolex box, well I got loads of those so didnt care. Prices going up - so pull the trigger or regret


__________________
Current rotation; AP15500ST grey, White Daytona 116500, WG Black/Red Daytona 116509, White and Black EXP 42, GMT2C.... too many previous it makes my head hurt thinking about them.
AH0RSEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 05:01 AM   #28
Boothy84
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 116710 BLNR, DJ
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by AH0RSEY View Post
i purchased a 116509 from watchfinder just back from RSC Feb this year. its fantastic - its heavier than you think, so make sure you try one on first and older models have the smaller clasp, so its NOT as comfortable as the newer bracelet models....i still have a 600 LN and I wear the 509 daily! its a scratch magnet - get over it! its a watch, itll scratch and RSC will fix it in 5 years or so if you really ding it.

Have to say I flipped a 116523 to get it - dont even compare, I LOVE the stealth of the WG over the Bicolour

oh - I have to say - the prices are going up and up.... I can tell you now, that I got mine from WF at £16k.... F serial, 1 month out of RSC and I although it didnt have a rolex box, well I got loads of those so didnt care. Prices going up - so pull the trigger or regret




You don’t work for watchfinder do you?

Your saying all the right things to convince me!! The main thing thats putting me off is me trading in 2017 & 2014 watches for a 14 year old watch, although as has been mentioned it has just been serviced so I guess it shouldn’t be an issue.

It looks great on your wrist!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Boothy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 05:08 AM   #29
LarsFS
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by AH0RSEY View Post
i purchased a 116509 from watchfinder just back from RSC Feb this year. its fantastic - its heavier than you think, so make sure you try one on first and older models have the smaller clasp, so its NOT as comfortable as the newer bracelet models....i still have a 600 LN and I wear the 509 daily! its a scratch magnet - get over it! its a watch, itll scratch and RSC will fix it in 5 years or so if you really ding it.

Have to say I flipped a 116523 to get it - dont even compare, I LOVE the stealth of the WG over the Bicolour

oh - I have to say - the prices are going up and up.... I can tell you now, that I got mine from WF at £16k.... F serial, 1 month out of RSC and I although it didnt have a rolex box, well I got loads of those so didnt care. Prices going up - so pull the trigger or regret


We see this too often: Somebody offers a statement of Rolex appreciation as gospel. Nobody knows what will happen. You may believe with all your heart that values will continue to go up, and they may well do so, but you do not [i]know[/] that they will. Of course, if anyone bases their procurement decision on the back of someone else's opinion, whether that opinion is presented as such, or portrayed as fact, then it's their call. I just find that, for me, it leaves a bad taste when someone who bought X is telling someone else that the value of X will continue to go up without providing any sound analysis for it (and even then, it is merely your theory), and I wish this forum would do away with that. But, of course, I recognize that this is simply my opinion.
LarsFS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2019, 05:08 AM   #30
LarsFS
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 81
I should also say: That is a very fine looking watch.
LarsFS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.