ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 November 2019, 06:17 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
|
Tudor In-House Movement Questions
Hello All
Is the Tudor MT5612 (and other 3 hand variants) truly 100% made in house (i.e. fully designed and manufactured by Tudor/Rolex)? I know that in-house has many meanings in our interesting watch world. Was any part of the new Tudor In-House movement derived from the Breitling B01? I look forward to your feedback. Regards |
22 November 2019, 07:08 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Rolex GMT Master 2
Posts: 724
|
Tudor In-House Movement Questions
|
22 November 2019, 05:35 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: James
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Panerai PAM89
Posts: 14
|
Oh wow... good read on both articles. Learned something new.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk |
22 November 2019, 08:09 PM | #4 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,675
|
Quote:
__________________
The King of Cool. |
|
23 November 2019, 11:09 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
|
https://youtu.be/5GbvU8J2IY8
Watch from 49:06 This guy claims that that MT5612 is a stripped down B01. Heck why wouldn't Breitling just say the B20 was based off of the B01 if the Tudor movement was based on the B01. Why give Tudor the credit? |
23 November 2019, 05:27 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,613
|
Tudor In-House Movement Questions
Quote:
The MT5612 is manufactured by Tudor. The MT5612 was traded to Breitling for their B01 because Tudor needs a chronograph movement. Meanwhile, Breitling needs a high caliber 3 hand + date movement for their own references. Breitling modifies the B01 to Tudor’s specification and delivers it to COSC where it is tested and delivered to Tudor to become the MT5813. Tudor does the same thing and manufactures the MT5612, modifies it to Breitling’s specification and delivers it to them as a B20. This trade benefits both Maisons greatly because they both get what they need in the advent of ETA reducing delivery of ETA movements to companies outside of the swatch group. |
|
23 November 2019, 06:03 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
|
Quote:
For some reason Cameron Weiss (American watch maker) has claimed that the MT5612 is a stripped down B01 and not and original Tudor/Rolex design. That is one hell of a claim and is stated in the video I linked at the time noted. His bold claim is why I am asking around. I just sent him a direct email for clarification;. I'll report back. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.