Trade 116610LN for 116710LN?

[GRabens]

Has anybody traded a Submariner ceramic 116610LN for a GMT 2 ceramic 116710LN and regretted it? I currently on two subs (116613LB), and I am thinking about maybe trading out the stainless steel sub for a stainless steel GMT2 to have some diversity in the collection. I know it’s a personal preference, but I love both watches and I’m just curious if somebody has done it and regretted it. I do enjoy traveling, so I thought the GMT might make more sense than two subs. Thanks for your comments.

[helloworldies]

I have done this in the past and no regrets.
I came to love the pcls and don't miss the glidelock.

[danwang0520]

Sub + GMT makes a great combo together….go ahead n make that trade happen^^

[JSolution]

Definitely.

[Keepchasing]

I would consider that for sure.

[boychild]

I did the opposite. Sold the GMT II-c for the Sub. No regrets. To each of their own.

[medcoastsol]

i have done something similar from a 5-digit sub date to gmt 2 ceramic and never looked back. 116710LN is my daily now

[dafuture]

I prefer the 116710LN to the 116610 - the Sub never wore right on me. I say go for it.

[JRell]

Since you have the TT Sub LB, might make sense, but then you have 2 watches with PCLs. I prefer the look of the sub over the gmt in general, so not sure if I would pull the trigger.

[minute_man]

116610LN for 116710LN is a good trade, especially since you travel, as well.
Now, if that was a 126610LN, that would be another discussion altogether.

[Onequik135i]

I have both, well the 126610LN. That’s a tough decision to make, They both wear differently.

[Ferdelious]

I prefer the Sub. I would do it for a BLNR or BLRO.

[dannyboy123]

I like variety, as you can see

[prnceofpersia23]

I think the LB would look great next to the GMT LN. Go for it!