ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 October 2009, 04:41 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: cary
Posts: 8
|
Is this normal?? Serial number question
Hello again TRF
I was just checking my new rolex and noticed the serial number starts with an "S" so that would date it to 1993. I checked the bracelet and it has a T as the stamp for the year which based on the list is a 1995. I have seen some list that state an "S" serial could be 1993 or 1995 year. Is this a case where the bracelet on my watch may be newer then the watch? Or is this a case where the serial on the watch could actually be a 1995 serial which then would make it match the 1995 bracelet stamp? Or is there just not enough information released about the serials to know for sure? Thanks again TRF |
10 October 2009, 05:21 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,495
|
Yes... You don't know..
You simply cannot use a chart to accurately date your watch...only to get an approximation.. ...............And here is a tip...many serial charts are wrong... Most charts do show that the S serial was first seen in 1993.... but that means that that is the first time it was reported or invoiced or even "back-dated by guess" to arrive at that date.. So....the vast majority of S serials would have actually been manufactured and sold after that first appearance... You are fortunate if you have an original bracelet.. you can use both of the "estimates" and feel fairly sure that your watch was made in late 1994 or 1995.. (remember..bracelet codes are guesses too), and probably not back when they were first reported as being seen - '93.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
10 October 2009, 05:28 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: cary
Posts: 8
|
Ok thanks...
Makes me feel much better knowing that my serial on the watch comes really close to the estimated date on the band. I am sure it is authentic but knowing that the pieces were most likely together their whole life makes it even better. |
10 October 2009, 10:47 AM | #4 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rik Dietel
Location: Seminole Fla
Watch: 5512 s/s Sub
Posts: 1,818
|
I heard a rumor that the new numbering system is going to make it even harder to tell production dates, apparently trying to help retail outlets with new old stock watches. Rik
|
10 October 2009, 10:50 AM | #5 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rik Dietel
Location: Seminole Fla
Watch: 5512 s/s Sub
Posts: 1,818
|
The R20 Rolex reference book I use for parts like tubes crwons crystals and gaskets was printed 15 years ago and the model numbers in there are still current. So Rolex plans these numbers way in advance for production runs. IMO Rik
|
10 October 2009, 10:50 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,834
|
I think Rolex should be more forthcoming with serial number and model/style number info.We all have a right to know how old the watch we are buying is and...if it is all original.
|
10 October 2009, 12:15 PM | #7 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,930
|
Quote:
As stated,some AD cannot sell new/old stock on certain pieces because the buyer most often wants the most current.! Especially higher end models.! Rob.
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member.. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.