The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 October 2009, 04:15 AM   #1
surillious
"TRF" Member
 
surillious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: Virginia
Watch: 14060M / 16613
Posts: 141
Case on Ceramic Bezel Submariner

I did a couple of searches, but could not come up with an answer as to why the case on the new ceramic Submariner changed. Several people noted that the watch case is wider where it meets the bracelet than it used to be, and looking at pictures, it does nothing for me.

Since the watch case in not more water resistant on the new ceramic bezel Submariner, why change the proportions?
__________________
Four-wheel drive pickup
I remember his last words:
Hold my beer, watch this!
surillious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 04:21 AM   #2
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
The Super Case is what you'll find on the GMTIIc. It seems to be the direction Rolex is headed, albeit slowly. Some like it some don't. I love the GMT, but can see why people prefer the older cases. They just seem to flow a little better, especially at the lugs. That said, I wouldn't trade my GMT for just about anything.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 05:12 AM   #3
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
Agreed, it's just Rolex's latest take on sports watches, and a general concession to the "big watch" trend without changing the case dimensions drastically. Just a case of smoke and mirrors really
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 06:22 AM   #4
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,640
im not a fan of the new cases at all. for me, the lugs are too wide..but worst of all, with the new crown guards, makes them look like bad replicas of thier former versions.
thesharkfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 06:24 AM   #5
wantonebad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
wantonebad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
Amen!!

hate is a strong word but I hate the super-case
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal...
on a fairly irrelevant social media site
that falsely inflates my fragile ego"
wantonebad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 06:27 AM   #6
lwrm23
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Craig
Location: Florida
Watch: SubC
Posts: 140
Do you think the reason for larger lugs associated with the block cases is for a longer life span of the case? For instance, more polishing?
lwrm23 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 06:30 AM   #7
wantonebad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
wantonebad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by lwrm23 View Post
Do you think the reason for larger lugs associated with the block cases is for a longer life span of the case? For instance, more polishing?
Not IMHO, there are plenty of vintage pieces that have survived multiple polishings by pros, and you can still over polish a super-case if you don't know what you're doing
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal...
on a fairly irrelevant social media site
that falsely inflates my fragile ego"
wantonebad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 06:30 AM   #8
Bullyterrier
"TRF" Member
 
Bullyterrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by lwrm23 View Post
Do you think the reason for larger lugs associated with the block cases is for a longer life span of the case? For instance, more polishing?
How much polishing do plan doing?
__________________
So Mote it be.
Bullyterrier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 06:34 AM   #9
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,640
i doubt it.. for the same reason cars rust and washing machines break down.. they dont last forever and have to be replaced.
thesharkfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 06:49 AM   #10
surillious
"TRF" Member
 
surillious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: Virginia
Watch: 14060M / 16613
Posts: 141
Thanks for the clarification. I guess I'm just a little disappointed that there seems to be no real reason for the change.

All the other changes made recently 1) ceramic bezel insert 2) new clasp, seem to be grounded in raising the quality standards, and giving customers what they desire. While my Rolex experience is limited, I not aware of any posts where there were complains about the old lugs not being wide enough.

I could totally see it if the bracelet were going to be widened too (a proportions thing), but since that isn't the case I am left perplexed.
__________________
Four-wheel drive pickup
I remember his last words:
Hold my beer, watch this!
surillious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 06:49 AM   #11
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by lwrm23 View Post
Do you think the reason for larger lugs associated with the block cases is for a longer life span of the case? For instance, more polishing?
I don't think so. Rolex is, in it's own way, moving in the direction of slightly larger watches.

It's something that isn't out of the ordinary though. If one looks at the evolution of the GMT (as well as others) the watches have grown larger. The 6542 was in the area of 37/38 mm before the 1675s 40mm thin case, then the thicker 16760,etc....
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 07:07 AM   #12
surillious
"TRF" Member
 
surillious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: Virginia
Watch: 14060M / 16613
Posts: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
If one looks at the evolution of the GMT (as well as others) the watches have grown larger. The 6542 was in the area of 37/38 mm before the 1675s 40mm thin case, then the thicker 16760,etc....
Interesting. Would that lead you to believe that eventually the bracelet will be widened? Perhaps a 42mm thin case with a 21/22mm bracelet at the lugs?

That is a proposition I could get behind because I feel the proportions would be more like on the current (non-ceramic) version.

Thanks for the info...now I have something new to ponder.
__________________
Four-wheel drive pickup
I remember his last words:
Hold my beer, watch this!
surillious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 07:39 AM   #13
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by surillious View Post
Interesting. Would that lead you to believe that eventually the bracelet will be widened? Perhaps a 42mm thin case with a 21/22mm bracelet at the lugs?

That is a proposition I could get behind because I feel the proportions would be more like on the current (non-ceramic) version.

Thanks for the info...now I have something new to ponder.
It is an interesting proposition, but I think Rolex has the die cast for the new SS Sub. Had they decided to follow the lead of the DSSD and increase the lug width I would have guessed it would have started with the gold and TT models.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 10:43 AM   #14
lwrm23
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Craig
Location: Florida
Watch: SubC
Posts: 140
How much would you think a new GMT or Submariner case would cost?? I am talking about the new block cases...
lwrm23 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 10:53 AM   #15
ingoodtime
"TRF" Member
 
ingoodtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBat View Post
The Super Case is what you'll find on the GMTIIc. It seems to be the direction Rolex is headed, albeit slowly. Some like it some don't. I love the GMT, but can see why people prefer the older cases. They just seem to flow a little better, especially at the lugs. That said, I wouldn't trade my GMT for just about anything.
My GMT has a problem. It never wants to leave my wrist! My poor poor sub is crying allot now! A little sibling rivalry!
ingoodtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 11:07 AM   #16
Luxe Time
"TRF" Member
 
Luxe Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Raja
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 951
The new case is most likely used to balance the heavier and slightly bulkier ceramic bezel and remain proportionate with the rest of the watch. To me it looks slightly less refined however this does add to the size perception of the watch. Just like a car manufacturer tweaking a car's body style, Rolex modified the case.

Another thought: Perhaps the case was changed so that the new ceramic bezel will not be interchangeable with the current 16610 bezel. This would prevent bezel swaps and encourage consumers to buy the new model.
Luxe Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 11:29 AM   #17
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
I am a big fan of the new cases...and cannot wait for the new SS sub
+ agree with Chris above: it's seems to be a concession to the bigger watch trend in Rolex's way
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2009, 10:06 PM   #18
the KING
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Paris
Posts: 218
it won't be polished bracelet but with new adjustable clasps.
the KING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2009, 10:25 PM   #19
Bullyterrier
"TRF" Member
 
Bullyterrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by The GMT Master View Post
Agreed, it's just Rolex's latest take on sports watches, and a general concession to the "big watch" trend without changing the case dimensions drastically. Just a case of smoke and mirrors really
I agree with Chris, I am not a fan of the larger cases, but no doubt in a few years time it will be the norm and we will probably look back and think how small and skinny the old watches were.
__________________
So Mote it be.
Bullyterrier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2009, 11:55 PM   #20
rolexnovice
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 16610
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by surillious View Post
Since the watch case in not more water resistant on the new ceramic bezel Submariner, why change the proportions?
Good question.

I can't wait to see the SS Sub next year to find out!
rolexnovice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2009, 01:08 AM   #21
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Watches, cars, guitars etc. Each mfg changes their models from time to time.

No avoiding it. Like death and taxes, eh?
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2009, 02:14 AM   #22
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,496
I think that with the success of the GMT II ceramic and it's block case, Rolex won't have any trouble selling every ceramic Sub they make..


Much as I dislike the block cases, it's going be awfully hard for me to pass one up.......
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2009, 02:46 AM   #23
cobblecanyon
"TRF" Member
 
cobblecanyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: JT
Location: Texas
Watch: 116710LN, 116610LN
Posts: 453
I love all the new upgrades Rolex has to offered,,,,evolution is a beautiful thing IMHO.
cobblecanyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2009, 02:49 AM   #24
rickyslam
"TRF" Member
 
rickyslam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Ricky
Location: City of Sin
Watch: Hulk, DaytonaC, DJ
Posts: 1,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobblecanyon View Post
I love all the new upgrades Rolex has to offered,,,,evolution is a beautiful thing IMHO.
x2
rickyslam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2009, 02:53 AM   #25
multimedia
"TRF" Member
 
multimedia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Joe
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,835
I like the new cases and I think it's only natural for a manufacturer to take the next step when it comes to product development. Sure, one might not like everything that comes out of each and every factory, but I personally for sure like it much better when a brand changes things around here and there, instead of just playing it safe year after year after year... what's the fun in that?

Cheers,
Joe
multimedia is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.