ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 October 2009, 04:15 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: Virginia
Watch: 14060M / 16613
Posts: 141
|
Case on Ceramic Bezel Submariner
I did a couple of searches, but could not come up with an answer as to why the case on the new ceramic Submariner changed. Several people noted that the watch case is wider where it meets the bracelet than it used to be, and looking at pictures, it does nothing for me.
Since the watch case in not more water resistant on the new ceramic bezel Submariner, why change the proportions?
__________________
Four-wheel drive pickup I remember his last words: Hold my beer, watch this! |
28 October 2009, 04:21 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
|
The Super Case is what you'll find on the GMTIIc. It seems to be the direction Rolex is headed, albeit slowly. Some like it some don't. I love the GMT, but can see why people prefer the older cases. They just seem to flow a little better, especially at the lugs. That said, I wouldn't trade my GMT for just about anything.
|
28 October 2009, 05:12 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
Agreed, it's just Rolex's latest take on sports watches, and a general concession to the "big watch" trend without changing the case dimensions drastically. Just a case of smoke and mirrors really
|
28 October 2009, 06:22 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,640
|
im not a fan of the new cases at all. for me, the lugs are too wide..but worst of all, with the new crown guards, makes them look like bad replicas of thier former versions.
|
28 October 2009, 06:24 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
Amen!!
hate is a strong word but I hate the super-case
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
28 October 2009, 06:27 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Craig
Location: Florida
Watch: SubC
Posts: 140
|
Do you think the reason for larger lugs associated with the block cases is for a longer life span of the case? For instance, more polishing?
|
28 October 2009, 06:30 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
Not IMHO, there are plenty of vintage pieces that have survived multiple polishings by pros, and you can still over polish a super-case if you don't know what you're doing
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
28 October 2009, 06:30 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
|
How much polishing do plan doing?
__________________
So Mote it be. |
28 October 2009, 06:34 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,640
|
i doubt it.. for the same reason cars rust and washing machines break down.. they dont last forever and have to be replaced.
|
28 October 2009, 06:49 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: Virginia
Watch: 14060M / 16613
Posts: 141
|
Thanks for the clarification. I guess I'm just a little disappointed that there seems to be no real reason for the change.
All the other changes made recently 1) ceramic bezel insert 2) new clasp, seem to be grounded in raising the quality standards, and giving customers what they desire. While my Rolex experience is limited, I not aware of any posts where there were complains about the old lugs not being wide enough. I could totally see it if the bracelet were going to be widened too (a proportions thing), but since that isn't the case I am left perplexed.
__________________
Four-wheel drive pickup I remember his last words: Hold my beer, watch this! |
28 October 2009, 06:49 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
It's something that isn't out of the ordinary though. If one looks at the evolution of the GMT (as well as others) the watches have grown larger. The 6542 was in the area of 37/38 mm before the 1675s 40mm thin case, then the thicker 16760,etc.... |
|
28 October 2009, 07:07 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: Virginia
Watch: 14060M / 16613
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
That is a proposition I could get behind because I feel the proportions would be more like on the current (non-ceramic) version. Thanks for the info...now I have something new to ponder.
__________________
Four-wheel drive pickup I remember his last words: Hold my beer, watch this! |
|
28 October 2009, 07:39 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
|
|
28 October 2009, 10:43 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Craig
Location: Florida
Watch: SubC
Posts: 140
|
How much would you think a new GMT or Submariner case would cost?? I am talking about the new block cases...
|
28 October 2009, 10:53 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,834
|
Quote:
|
|
28 October 2009, 11:07 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Raja
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 951
|
The new case is most likely used to balance the heavier and slightly bulkier ceramic bezel and remain proportionate with the rest of the watch. To me it looks slightly less refined however this does add to the size perception of the watch. Just like a car manufacturer tweaking a car's body style, Rolex modified the case.
Another thought: Perhaps the case was changed so that the new ceramic bezel will not be interchangeable with the current 16610 bezel. This would prevent bezel swaps and encourage consumers to buy the new model. |
28 October 2009, 11:29 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
|
I am a big fan of the new cases...and cannot wait for the new SS sub
+ agree with Chris above: it's seems to be a concession to the bigger watch trend in Rolex's way
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ "The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw |
13 November 2009, 10:06 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Paris
Posts: 218
|
it won't be polished bracelet but with new adjustable clasps.
|
13 November 2009, 10:25 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
|
I agree with Chris, I am not a fan of the larger cases, but no doubt in a few years time it will be the norm and we will probably look back and think how small and skinny the old watches were.
__________________
So Mote it be. |
13 November 2009, 11:55 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 16610
Posts: 366
|
|
14 November 2009, 01:08 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Watches, cars, guitars etc. Each mfg changes their models from time to time.
No avoiding it. Like death and taxes, eh? |
14 November 2009, 02:14 AM | #22 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,496
|
I think that with the success of the GMT II ceramic and it's block case, Rolex won't have any trouble selling every ceramic Sub they make..
Much as I dislike the block cases, it's going be awfully hard for me to pass one up.......
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
14 November 2009, 02:46 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: JT
Location: Texas
Watch: 116710LN, 116610LN
Posts: 453
|
I love all the new upgrades Rolex has to offered,,,,evolution is a beautiful thing IMHO.
|
14 November 2009, 02:49 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Ricky
Location: City of Sin
Watch: Hulk, DaytonaC, DJ
Posts: 1,149
|
|
14 November 2009, 02:53 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Joe
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,835
|
I like the new cases and I think it's only natural for a manufacturer to take the next step when it comes to product development. Sure, one might not like everything that comes out of each and every factory, but I personally for sure like it much better when a brand changes things around here and there, instead of just playing it safe year after year after year... what's the fun in that?
Cheers, Joe |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.