ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Buddyv · 4 February 2020, 01:06 PM

I am interested in the Sea Dweller 116600..... LOVE the dimensions and the smaller lugs than the sub of the same year.

But..... I also like the no-date sub #114060.... and it would save me a bit of money.

Does anyone own the 116600 that can give me their thoughts on the watch?

Robert

joli160 · 4 February 2020, 08:01 PM

The 116600 was a very slow seller.
Since it was discontinued combined with the SS hype it's become a bit more desirable.

For me it's in the category no meat nor fish, I don't understand the concept of this one.
The slimmed lugs look OK but the fatter lugs on the 114060 are just as nice.
Comparing the both I find it is too thick for it's size and would pick either a Submariner for it's looks or a DSSD for it's engineering.

Kostas · 4 February 2020, 08:50 PM

stratguy · 5 February 2020, 01:05 AM

114060 gets my vote.

904VT · 5 February 2020, 01:12 AM

The lugs on the 116600 really aren't any smaller than the 114060. It's just the shape that curves more and visually looks smaller.

Jmbarrack · 5 February 2020, 01:35 AM

I own an SD4k.

I purchased it for the reasons you mentioned; slimmer lugs with nicer proportions, lines, and balance.

The SD also has slimmer crown guards and a shorter lug to lug measurement by about 2mm over both 5 and 6 digit Submariner references. The SD is heavier than the Submariners and that may take some getting used to if you're used to a lighter watch.

But I prefer the smaller overall wrist footprint and proportions of the SD over the 114060 (Or 116610, 116710, etc).

efthi · 5 February 2020, 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kostas

Gorgeous watch and pic.. always had a soft spot for the SD4K, had one and sold it and then it was discontinued so I didn’t chase them on again.. wouldn’t let go if I could go back

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

TheWatchEnthusiast · 5 February 2020, 05:41 AM

There is not a right or wrong answer. I own both the 116600 and the 114060 and depends on what you want and like they can both be the perfect watch.
Sub is balanced, light and legendary as well as wearing much more comfortable than the 116600 do to it’s thinner profile and lesser weight.
The 116600 is definitely rarer and very beautiful, it has a date complication, it’s the first ceramic SeaDweller as well as the last 40mm with no magnifying glass SeaDweller. The shortest production cycle than any other ceramic bezel out there. I actually like the fully minute markers around the bezel as well as the fact you see very few of them in the wild and feels more exclusive. ( I still haven’t seen one in someone’s else’s wrist other than the internet).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Flyoverguy · 5 February 2020, 08:35 AM

Date without cyclops is my preference. I do not find it too thick either.

psv · 5 February 2020, 08:47 AM

I refer to my 116600 as the Goldilocks of Rolex. It is not too big, or too small - it is just right! :-)

It sits a tad higher due to the HV, but wears smaller than the 114060. The Sub gets it balance from the dial, the SD gets it's balance from the case. And I love the old military style grader bezel.

If you can get a Sub 114060 at retail and you want to save money, then by all means, do it. Otherwise, I'd say the SD116600 is the way too go - much more unique, more interesting and wears so well. It could very well be your one and only Rolex.

FTX I · 5 February 2020, 08:55 AM

I'd vote 114060 without hesitation. However, if they still offered the SD4k I'd buy one for sure. I like plain black divers in SS, especially with glidelock clasp, and there's nothing else for me other than the Subs I already own in their lineup unfortunately.

GsurgBM · 5 February 2020, 09:12 AM

Go with the sub, or jump to the DSSD. No real logic for the in between to me.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CDNWatchNut · 5 February 2020, 10:17 AM

I have a 114060 so I'm biased, however I tried a SD4K on, wore it for a few minutes and it was not nearly as comfortable as the sub. The case thickness and weight make it comparatively top heavy and for the reason of discomfort alone, I wouldn't buy one...beautiful watch to look at though. In contrast, the sub is all day comfortable.

brandrea · 5 February 2020, 10:57 AM

The Submariner is the winner in terms of comfort. I also prefer the clean dial layout.

abozz · 5 February 2020, 10:59 AM

I'm fan of the SeaDweller history (Comex, Picard, etc).

Enviado desde mi SM-G975F mediante Tapatalk

kamonjj · 5 February 2020, 11:07 AM

Sounds like you LOVE the 116600, and only like the 114060.

Listen to your heart and get the 116600

SushiSean · 5 February 2020, 11:08 AM

Very happy with my James Cameron!

4 February 2020, 08:01 PM	#2
joli160 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,621	The 116600 was a very slow seller. Since it was discontinued combined with the SS hype it's become a bit more desirable. For me it's in the category no meat nor fish, I don't understand the concept of this one. The slimmed lugs look OK but the fatter lugs on the 114060 are just as nice. Comparing the both I find it is too thick for it's size and would pick either a Submariner for it's looks or a DSSD for it's engineering. __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

5 February 2020, 05:41 AM	#8
TheWatchEnthusiast 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: John Location: US Watch: 116610LV,SD43,BLNR Posts: 488	Thoughts on 116600 vs. no-date sub There is not a right or wrong answer. I own both the 116600 and the 114060 and depends on what you want and like they can both be the perfect watch. Sub is balanced, light and legendary as well as wearing much more comfortable than the 116600 do to it’s thinner profile and lesser weight. The 116600 is definitely rarer and very beautiful, it has a date complication, it’s the first ceramic SeaDweller as well as the last 40mm with no magnifying glass SeaDweller. The shortest production cycle than any other ceramic bezel out there. I actually like the fully minute markers around the bezel as well as the fact you see very few of them in the wild and feels more exclusive. ( I still haven’t seen one in someone’s else’s wrist other than the internet). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5 February 2020, 09:12 AM	#12
GsurgBM "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: USA Watch: Not enough Posts: 3,759	Go with the sub, or jump to the DSSD. No real logic for the in between to me. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Rolex • Tudor • Omega • Panerai

5 February 2020, 11:07 AM	#16
kamonjj "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Real Name: J Location: Pittsburgh, PA Watch: 16610 Posts: 225	Sounds like you LOVE the 116600, and only like the 114060. Listen to your heart and get the 116600 __________________ Current: ♛ Rolex 126200, ♛ Rolex 14060m equipped w/glidelock, Apple Watch, G-Shock Gone but not forgotten: Way too many to remember!

4 February 2020, 01:06 PM	#1
Buddyv "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Location: Santa Rosa, CA Posts: 27	Thoughts on 116600 vs. no-date sub I am interested in the Sea Dweller 116600..... LOVE the dimensions and the smaller lugs than the sub of the same year. But..... I also like the no-date sub #114060.... and it would save me a bit of money. Does anyone own the 116600 that can give me their thoughts on the watch? Robert

4 February 2020, 08:50 PM	#3
Kostas 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: Australia Watch: @ kostastimepieces Posts: 5,268

5 February 2020, 01:05 AM	#4
stratguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: USA Watch: Speedmaster Pro Posts: 670	114060 gets my vote.

5 February 2020, 01:12 AM	#5
904VT "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: USA Watch: All Rolex Posts: 7,024	The lugs on the 116600 really aren't any smaller than the 114060. It's just the shape that curves more and visually looks smaller.

5 February 2020, 01:35 AM	#6
Jmbarrack "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2018 Location: United States Watch: Ever changing! Posts: 1,150	I own an SD4k. I purchased it for the reasons you mentioned; slimmer lugs with nicer proportions, lines, and balance. The SD also has slimmer crown guards and a shorter lug to lug measurement by about 2mm over both 5 and 6 digit Submariner references. The SD is heavier than the Submariners and that may take some getting used to if you're used to a lighter watch. But I prefer the smaller overall wrist footprint and proportions of the SD over the 114060 (Or 116610, 116710, etc).

5 February 2020, 08:35 AM	#9
Flyoverguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2018 Location: Chicago Posts: 160	Date without cyclops is my preference. I do not find it too thick either.

5 February 2020, 08:47 AM	#10
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	I refer to my 116600 as the Goldilocks of Rolex. It is not too big, or too small - it is just right! :-) It sits a tad higher due to the HV, but wears smaller than the 114060. The Sub gets it balance from the dial, the SD gets it's balance from the case. And I love the old military style grader bezel. If you can get a Sub 114060 at retail and you want to save money, then by all means, do it. Otherwise, I'd say the SD116600 is the way too go - much more unique, more interesting and wears so well. It could very well be your one and only Rolex.

5 February 2020, 08:55 AM	#11
FTX I "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Flavio Location: N/A Posts: 14,654	I'd vote 114060 without hesitation. However, if they still offered the SD4k I'd buy one for sure. I like plain black divers in SS, especially with glidelock clasp, and there's nothing else for me other than the Subs I already own in their lineup unfortunately.

5 February 2020, 10:17 AM	#13
CDNWatchNut "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Juan Location: Sherwood Park, Ab Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,509	I have a 114060 so I'm biased, however I tried a SD4K on, wore it for a few minutes and it was not nearly as comfortable as the sub. The case thickness and weight make it comparatively top heavy and for the reason of discomfort alone, I wouldn't buy one...beautiful watch to look at though. In contrast, the sub is all day comfortable.

5 February 2020, 10:57 AM	#14
brandrea 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 76,814	The Submariner is the winner in terms of comfort. I also prefer the clean dial layout.

5 February 2020, 10:59 AM	#15
abozz "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: In my home. Watch: 116660, 126600 Posts: 2,905	I'm fan of the SeaDweller history (Comex, Picard, etc). Enviado desde mi SM-G975F mediante Tapatalk

5 February 2020, 11:08 AM	#17
SushiSean "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2020 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 84	Very happy with my James Cameron!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)