The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 March 2020, 09:07 AM   #31
zorinindustries
"TRF" Member
 
zorinindustries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: United States / F
Watch: It varies
Posts: 343
Love my tank!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
zorinindustries is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 09:18 AM   #32
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by c41006 View Post
Not entirely shocking. We shall see how 2020 ends up looking.
2019; Best year ever for Rolex

2020; Worst year ever for Rolex
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 09:24 AM   #33
Yess
"TRF" Member
 
Yess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Good Hope
Watch: 124060
Posts: 1,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatSubGuy View Post
No wonder they had their best year yet, you're pretty much forced to buy 2-3 other models first before you can buy the one you really want.
This is funny... sold a million watches to 7 people
Yess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 09:38 AM   #34
sgwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
sgwatchguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: KP Jimmy
Location: Singapore
Watch: R/AP/FPJ/Hermès/et
Posts: 6,597
Rolex records best-ever sales in 2019

I don’t get the Richard Mille numbers. Maybe their accountants are as creative as their distribution guys. Complete mystery. Unless they’re booking sales at inflated numbers directly to greys, hows that spike possible for a brand that has limited production and supply. Am I missing something?
And going by that logic/accounting principle even R/PP/AP would see big surges in revenues.

Head scratcher.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

Last edited by sgwatchguy; 25 March 2020 at 09:39 AM.. Reason: Typos
sgwatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 09:43 AM   #35
Greenp
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgwatchguy View Post
I don’t get the Richard Mille numbers. Maybe their accountants are as creative as their distribution guys. Complete mystery. Unless they’re booking sales at inflated numbers directly to greys, hows that spike possible for a brand that has limited production and supply. Am I missing something?
And going by that logic/accounting principle even R/PP/AP would see big surges in revenues.

Head scratcher.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A lot of their watches cost >$750K-$1Mil.
Greenp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 10:07 AM   #36
Dougiebaby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Doug
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Daytona BLNR SubLV
Posts: 2,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasTPE View Post
Happy Tuesday everyone! Hang in there!

https://usa.watchpro.com/rolex-recor...=notifications

JasTPE


I think these numbers prove Rolex DID NOT limit supply -- in fact, the opposite. They delivered more watches. So many accusing Rolex of limiting supply to drive up prices is rather ... foolish.

Of course, the ADs may have sold them off to GM, but Rolex increased production.
Dougiebaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 10:20 AM   #37
Claven2
"TRF" Member
 
Claven2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: OTTAWA
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yess View Post
This is funny... sold a million watches to 7 people
All of them established Grey dealers...
Claven2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 10:20 AM   #38
Claven2
"TRF" Member
 
Claven2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: OTTAWA
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgwatchguy View Post
I don’t get the Richard Mille numbers. Maybe their accountants are as creative as their distribution guys. Complete mystery. Unless they’re booking sales at inflated numbers directly to greys, hows that spike possible for a brand that has limited production and supply. Am I missing something?
And going by that logic/accounting principle even R/PP/AP would see big surges in revenues.

Head scratcher.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Me neither. To be honest, you'd have to pay me to wear RM. FUGLY.
Claven2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 10:21 AM   #39
Claven2
"TRF" Member
 
Claven2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: OTTAWA
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dougiebaby View Post
I think these numbers prove Rolex DID NOT limit supply -- in fact, the opposite. They delivered more watches. So many accusing Rolex of limiting supply to drive up prices is rather ... foolish.

Of course, the ADs may have sold them off to GM, but Rolex increased production.
More than anything, it's reflective of the nouveau riche class of consumer in China vying for a largely unchanged annual supply of Rolexes if you ask me.
Claven2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 10:35 AM   #40
sgwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
sgwatchguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: KP Jimmy
Location: Singapore
Watch: R/AP/FPJ/Hermès/et
Posts: 6,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenp View Post
A lot of their watches cost >$750K-$1Mil.

No different from the year before.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
sgwatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 10:39 AM   #41
JasTPE
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Jason
Location: Vancouver, BC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dougiebaby View Post
I think these numbers prove Rolex DID NOT limit supply -- in fact, the opposite. They delivered more watches. So many accusing Rolex of limiting supply to drive up prices is rather ... foolish.



Of course, the ADs may have sold them off to GM, but Rolex increased production.
I agree.

If that is their capacity then so be it!

It's not easy to keep up with demand and maintain quality at the same time. It's actually a real struggle for manufacturers to keep losing sales due to backorders. I would think all brands want to make as much profit as possible while upholding their standards.

Whatever games ADs are playing, such as bundling etc, as it is not across the board, I do not believe it is something Rolex is encouraging but perhaps they are not actively acting on those at the same time.

An article I shared the other day from Hodinkee about Rolex really makes it even more satisfying to own such a beautifully made timepiece.

Just my two cents.

JasTPE
JasTPE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2020, 10:59 AM   #42
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Bear in mind that these are only estimates, of course.
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.