The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 May 2020, 07:43 PM   #91
GGGMT
2024 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brny11 View Post
Hey, curious how easylink makes it more comfortable? When I owned, I disliked easy link. My wrists in humid weather grow .2-.5mm, so sub glide lock would come in handy. However, easylink (@5mm) was useless IMO. If watch was tight, I’d open it up and it become wayyyy to loose sliding around wrist obnoxiously.

Curious your experience?

1/5 of 1mm? That’s micro. How’d u measure that? Easy link works great for me


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2020, 11:33 PM   #92
JamyMC
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2019
Real Name: Jamie
Location: United states
Watch: Rolex 116710
Posts: 108
The Explorer will be an excellent choice for me.
JamyMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2020, 01:11 AM   #93
cuibono
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Watch: SS SkyD
Posts: 564
The fact that people are still encountering date issues, some repeatedly, with the BB GMT and that Tudor has yet to explain themselves or fix the problem would make this decision a no brainer for me.

Do you want your watch to be on your wrist or off getting fixed for months at a time?

Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
cuibono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2020, 02:22 AM   #94
007_Omega
"TRF" Member
 
007_Omega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Galaxy
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 905
Explorer and don't look back. You already have a Tudor BB and one is more than enough.
007_Omega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2020, 10:35 AM   #95
ACM0302
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Virginia
Posts: 5
I had the Tudor GMT for a bit and found the case too thick. I sold it and picked up a 214270 MK 1 Explorer. I prefer the Explorer.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg DDA3E271-ECF3-41F9-B8C8-070DDF282960.jpeg (126.9 KB, 46 views)
File Type: jpeg 771877B5-5404-41D1-98A1-2C37EFD0C1C6.jpeg (171.1 KB, 46 views)
ACM0302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2020, 10:59 AM   #96
chinaski
"TRF" Member
 
chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: SpeedyProExplorer1
Posts: 418
I have a BB steel and a 14270 Explorer.

Explorer FTW, no comparison.
chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.