ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 May 2020, 07:43 PM | #91 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,283
|
Quote:
1/5 of 1mm? That’s micro. How’d u measure that? Easy link works great for me Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
9 May 2020, 11:33 PM | #92 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Real Name: Jamie
Location: United states
Watch: Rolex 116710
Posts: 108
|
The Explorer will be an excellent choice for me.
|
10 May 2020, 01:11 AM | #93 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Watch: SS SkyD
Posts: 564
|
The fact that people are still encountering date issues, some repeatedly, with the BB GMT and that Tudor has yet to explain themselves or fix the problem would make this decision a no brainer for me.
Do you want your watch to be on your wrist or off getting fixed for months at a time? Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk |
10 May 2020, 02:22 AM | #94 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Galaxy
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 905
|
Explorer and don't look back. You already have a Tudor BB and one is more than enough.
|
2 July 2020, 10:35 AM | #95 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Virginia
Posts: 5
|
I had the Tudor GMT for a bit and found the case too thick. I sold it and picked up a 214270 MK 1 Explorer. I prefer the Explorer.
|
2 July 2020, 10:59 AM | #96 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: SpeedyProExplorer1
Posts: 418
|
I have a BB steel and a 14270 Explorer.
Explorer FTW, no comparison. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.