ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Meyrin · 24 August 2020, 03:56 AM

Root Beer and OP for me.

WatchYonder · 24 August 2020, 04:07 AM

BLNR and IWC. Covers everything: dress and casual, two different metals, and of course having more total complications automatically makes a watch better, right ;)

pedersenkl · 24 August 2020, 04:22 AM

Rootbeer and OP

zjd168 · 24 August 2020, 04:28 AM

watch wise I would pick 1, however I don't want to deal with any headache of owning and maintaining any IWC complication.

As a result I have to go for 2 of these options.

Eacast · 24 August 2020, 04:32 AM

Blnr & iwc

tally · 24 August 2020, 04:38 AM

never give up your original batman

denmanproject · 24 August 2020, 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tally

never give up your original batman

This is my dilemma! the ONLY watch I would let it go for is the RG CHNR but even then will be tough

denmanproject · 24 August 2020, 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zjd168

watch wise I would pick 1, however I don't want to deal with any headache of owning and maintaining any IWC complication.

As a result I have to go for 2 of these options.

Good point, I also own a RG 7day Portugese and has been rock solid but a perp cal is another beast

denmanproject · 24 August 2020, 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rcclarkie

You've already got the best, most versatile pair

Thank you

I also own a RG 7day Portugese but something is pushing me lately to condense down to 2

Oyster Sauce · 24 August 2020, 05:03 AM

BLNR and IWC

noshame · 24 August 2020, 05:09 AM

Quoting envuks: "I prefer the CHNR above all these other watches.

However, the better pair here to own, imho, is the BLNR and IWC. Reason being is that they are closer to equal footing. You’ll be more likely to reach for them equally rather than one of them attracting more love than the other.

With the CHNR and OP, the CHNR will dominate. Which will make the OP feel less enjoyable over the long run.

This is just my personal opinion. I currently own a two rolex collection with a 116718 and 116500. I feel they’re close to equal players and it keeps me loving both kids equally.

Can’t really go wrong here though."

... This is a well-thought out response by envuks and makes sense. I have a 116610LN and 126710BLNR which I love "equally" and are, as envuks calls it, close to "equal footing". That's why I wear them about equally.

house5988 · 24 August 2020, 12:58 PM

BLNR. I recently got one so I may be biased.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Silver Bullet · 25 August 2020, 12:35 AM

#1, unless you really enjoy

, then #2.

24 August 2020, 05:09 AM	#41
noshame "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2020 Real Name: Alex Location: Canada Posts: 1,649	Quoting envuks: "I prefer the CHNR above all these other watches. However, the better pair here to own, imho, is the BLNR and IWC. Reason being is that they are closer to equal footing. You’ll be more likely to reach for them equally rather than one of them attracting more love than the other. With the CHNR and OP, the CHNR will dominate. Which will make the OP feel less enjoyable over the long run. This is just my personal opinion. I currently own a two rolex collection with a 116718 and 116500. I feel they’re close to equal players and it keeps me loving both kids equally. Can’t really go wrong here though." ... This is a well-thought out response by envuks and makes sense. I have a 116610LN and 126710BLNR which I love "equally" and are, as envuks calls it, close to "equal footing". That's why I wear them about equally. __________________ Submariner Date 116610LN \| GMT-Master II 126710BLNR on Jubilee \| Explorer Rolesor 124273 \| Explorer II Polar 226570

24 August 2020, 03:56 AM	#31
Meyrin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2019 Real Name: Ian Location: Hamburg Watch: Sub 14060 Posts: 1,159	Root Beer and OP for me.

24 August 2020, 04:07 AM	#32
WatchYonder "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2020 Location: Midwest USA Watch: 126710 BLNR Posts: 37	BLNR and IWC. Covers everything: dress and casual, two different metals, and of course having more total complications automatically makes a watch better, right ;)

24 August 2020, 04:22 AM	#33
pedersenkl "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: NC Watch: Daytona, GMT, Sub Posts: 390	Rootbeer and OP

24 August 2020, 04:28 AM	#34
zjd168 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: US Posts: 2,698	watch wise I would pick 1, however I don't want to deal with any headache of owning and maintaining any IWC complication. As a result I have to go for 2 of these options.

24 August 2020, 04:32 AM	#35
Eacast "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Real Name: Eddie Location: panama Watch: Rolex Posts: 211	Blnr & iwc

24 August 2020, 04:38 AM	#36
tally "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2020 Location: London Posts: 107	never give up your original batman

24 August 2020, 05:03 AM	#40
Oyster Sauce "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2020 Location: USA Posts: 1,866	BLNR and IWC

24 August 2020, 12:58 PM	#42
house5988 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2018 Location: USA Posts: 25	BLNR. I recently got one so I may be biased. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

25 August 2020, 12:35 AM	#43
Silver Bullet "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: Earth Watch: 5711 Posts: 262	#1, unless you really enjoy , then #2.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)