ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 October 2020, 04:15 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10
|
Lange Datograph 39mm Question
Hello all,
Wanted to get some help with the original 39mm Lange Datographs, in platinum (403.035) and rose gold (403.032), one of my absolute grail watches. I am looking to purchase one in the near term (<12 months) to commemorate launching a new business and the birth of my first child. My wrist is exactly 6.5 inches and I have no other gold or platinum watches in my collection, nor any dress-ish watches. I have not tried on either of these watches yet but plan to do so at some point. For those that have owned/currently owned the pieces (and bonus points if you could also provide answers relative to the current 41mm up/down datographs), I have a few questions: 1) I have heard that the platinum watch is very top heavy due to the platinum and on a smaller wrist, flops around. Can anyone talk about this? It seems to have the exact same dimensions as a 114060 no date submariner to a tee (weight within a few grams, lug to lug within ~1mm, height within 0.5mm), which fits great on my wrist. 2) Rose gold or platinum? I'm leaning towards platinum solely because it is the original version which, down the road, may make it much more collectible and unique. Looks wise, I'm really indifferent. However, it does cost ~10K more than the rose gold. Any thoughts on plat vs. rose gold or is it just personal preference? 3) Does anyone have photos of either the old 39mm datographs or the 41mm new ones on a ~6.5 inch wrist? 4) Anything else I should know as I seek out one of my grails? Thank you for your help! |
25 October 2020, 05:19 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: woodmere,ny
Posts: 573
|
I had the rose gold and found it wore better on the deployant. It is thick for its size but an amazing watch. I now have the platinum dato perpetual and like the size better for me. I have a 7in wrist
|
25 October 2020, 10:40 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: @jb.watching
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,483
|
6.25 inch wrist, the Up/Down was honestly a little too big for me. I started out searching for the original but over time I just thought the Up/Down was more contemporary in its look and was a better match for me personally.
Re the metal choice, the platinum is obviously more versatile and wearable for most people and that was the case for me too. Good luck with your search. It’s a watch worth putting some energy and effort towards. Whether it’ll be what you expect once you get it that’s never certain. But there’s only one way to find out. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
25 October 2020, 11:16 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Nick
Location: CT
Watch: Rolex, Lange
Posts: 185
|
I have the 41mm Up/Down in Platinum. 6.75" wrist. The size is perfect for me. Platinum all the way imo. Much more versatile and under the radar.
|
25 October 2020, 11:46 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The best coast
Watch: 5726, 5212
Posts: 692
|
Quote:
Greetings! The short asnswer Is I went for the 403 Platinum about a couple months ago and I have closer to 7” wrist now; used to be 6.75. LOL. If the 41mm was similar in price than the 39mm I prolly would have went down that route since I like bigger watches and I like longer power reserves (who doesn’t!!) and I really like PR indicators and the fact that it’s newer may in theory mean you have to service it less etc. However, as you know there is a real price difference; so didn’t consider it too seriously and thought that I could spend that delta on another watch. Since I had never worn either nor seen either before I purchased the 403; what really blew me away was how nice the dial was with the gold applied Roman numerals! Very sparkly!!! I already knew I was going to be impressed by the movement, so in that sense it was less of a surprise relative to my expectations. Also many collectors prefer the OG vs the new but I am guessing part of it is that many like smaller dress watches. I went with the white metal (would have been totally happy with WG if it existed) since I thought it would be more versatile and under the radar. Like Jay mentioned you won’t know about fitment until you try. Others try on a deployant to counterweight the watch head. I am wearing with the OEM pin buckle and am NOT between holes. If you are in-between holes on the strap you could find yourself with the watch head too loose and find it annoying due to the weight if it slid along your arm. Mine felt good. The pt weighs 145g, so if you have other watches and a scale atleast you will have a good idea of the relative weight. Good luck! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
25 October 2020, 06:26 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
However, I also have a 6,5" wrist and although it looked good and fit well if I had the strap very snug it was never comfortable. The proportions were off in some way. The area it sits on your wrist is smal due to the protruding display case back. If you have it looser it will flopp around. Not just sideways but also up and down. I did not have the deployant buckle but I've heard those are not comfortable for small wrists as it goes on one side, at least the old heavy version. From the platinum or rose gold, either one is great. I think the platinum is more casual and sporty and maybe can be matched easier dress wise. I have a Daymatic 39,5mm in Pt and that one sit closer to the wrist making it more comfortable, lower stance if that makes sense. Before you buy, do also consider 1815 Chronograph which has same movement and is more wearable. |
|
25 October 2020, 09:27 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Somewhere in time
Watch: Lange & Patek
Posts: 612
|
I have a 7 inch wrist and initially got the older "single fold" deployant clasp for my 1815 Chronograph. In the end I had to swap that to the newer double fold ("butterfly") deployant clasp due to comfort and the fact that the single fold sprung up whenever I clapped my hands. Very happy with the (newer) double fold claps and would recommend it to anyone considering upgrading their Lange to a deployant clasp.
|
25 October 2020, 11:33 PM | #8 | |||||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
26 October 2020, 03:55 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: San Fran
Posts: 2,214
|
I purchased the Datograph UP/Down and I have a 6.4 in wrist. I love it. I almost always go with steel, titanium, platinum or white gold in that order if possible but I loved the contrast and look of the rose gold over the platinum. I generally like the tang buckle and purchased an OEM buckle but was surprised the deployment buckle worked well with the datograph.
I also own the platinum double split chrono on a tang buckle and the 1815 rattrapante perpetual calendar in platinum on deployment.. They all wear well. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.