ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

karleone · 2 March 2022, 09:38 PM

No way!!

GB-man · 2 March 2022, 10:57 PM

Depends on the example and what else you have in the box. I’m not up to date on the figures but the 5060 is damn cool.

JRell · 2 March 2022, 10:58 PM

Not for that watch, you should get money.

AJMarcus · 2 March 2022, 11:30 PM

No. That would be an awful trade.

Farsh14 · 3 March 2022, 12:12 AM

The money seems right but I think it’s cooler to have that sub and gmt in your collection and also consider their stock is still rising and likely won’t stop for the foreseeable future. Would maybe part ways with one of them and account for the cash so then you have the Patek and one Rolex. But again if you end up regretting the trade will be hard to go back.

I do like that other Patek you considered though

jgottsman11 · 3 March 2022, 12:50 AM

Lol a 5060?

SudiYunus · 3 March 2022, 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pandaboy50

126710 blnr oyster + 126610lv cermit +10k for a patek 5060a?

no !!!

MichelleP · 3 March 2022, 05:25 AM

No way.

dba · 3 March 2022, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pandaboy50

I'm going to decline the trade. I think I'd rather pursue the 5524G over the 5060a.

I've dreamed of an aquanaut but not quite the right trade.

Thanks for helping me think clearly.

Good call.

Spectre38 · 3 March 2022, 05:31 AM

Nope...

DubOhio · 3 March 2022, 05:41 AM

if I could get my hands on a BLNR there would be very few watches in this world i'd let it go for...

dannyp · 3 March 2022, 06:52 AM

It’s unlikely of trade two watches I got brand new for one vintage. That said, if I’d gotten those two Rolex at MSRP, it might not be the worst from an economic standpoint. The 5060 *should* be the most collectible Aquanaut three-hander as it’s the original and had the shortest run. But now we’re talking about appeal to actual watch collectors…

hutch300 · 3 March 2022, 07:12 AM

zero point zero

CoveWatch · 3 March 2022, 08:14 AM

Personally wouldn't and the 36mm likely wears noticeably smaller than your current two watches being traded. I would absolutely try it on before even considering it. There's always 5167 also, albeit more costly

Driver8 · 3 March 2022, 10:00 AM

If you bought the 126710BLNR and the 126610LV at retail, then the cash stacks up just fine IMO. However, I wouldn't do it for a 5060A.

Now if you'd said a 5167A instead... then I'd say definitely.

GGGMT · 3 March 2022, 10:02 AM

No

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Kyjeeprealtor · 3 March 2022, 10:04 AM

I personally would not

jb335 · 3 March 2022, 10:18 AM

Isn’t that the 36mm Aquanaut?

If so, NO WAY.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

pandaboy50 · 3 March 2022, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannyp

It’s unlikely of trade two watches I got brand new for one vintage. That said, if I’d gotten those two Rolex at MSRP, it might not be the worst from an economic standpoint. The 5060 *should* be the most collectible Aquanaut three-hander as it’s the original and had the shortest run. But now we’re talking about appeal to actual watch collectors…

This was the only reason I was really entertaining the trade. If I'm honest I have a pretty decent rolex collection and this would be my first step into patek. Just not sure if it's the right watch to trade such a valuable pairing for.

MOXIDUST · 3 March 2022, 06:16 PM

for a 35mm aquanaut NEVER

George58 · 3 March 2022, 07:40 PM

I would love mine you're not gong to regret it's rare, great on the wrist and it's a PATEK

HL65 · 3 March 2022, 07:42 PM

No

2 March 2022, 10:57 PM	#32
GB-man 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 37,247	Depends on the example and what else you have in the box. I’m not up to date on the figures but the 5060 is damn cool. __________________

2 March 2022, 10:58 PM	#33
JRell "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2020 Location: Pittsburgh Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee Posts: 7,029	Not for that watch, you should get money. __________________ 126710 BLNR Jubilee

3 March 2022, 12:50 AM	#36
jgottsman11 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: wHerE do U liv Watch: President Posts: 1,435	Lol a 5060? __________________ 5164R Aquanaut "Tiffany & Co" 18238 Champagne Day Date

3 March 2022, 05:31 AM	#40
Spectre38 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2020 Real Name: Paul Location: Out West Watch: and be amazed. Posts: 1,552	Nope... __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro Grouch Curmudgeons

3 March 2022, 07:42 PM	#52
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,924	No __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

2 March 2022, 09:38 PM	#31
karleone "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Dayona Posts: 2,269	No way!!

2 March 2022, 11:30 PM	#34
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,232	No. That would be an awful trade.

3 March 2022, 12:12 AM	#35
Farsh14 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: NYC Watch: The Green Sub Posts: 474	The money seems right but I think it’s cooler to have that sub and gmt in your collection and also consider their stock is still rising and likely won’t stop for the foreseeable future. Would maybe part ways with one of them and account for the cash so then you have the Patek and one Rolex. But again if you end up regretting the trade will be hard to go back. I do like that other Patek you considered though

3 March 2022, 05:25 AM	#38
MichelleP "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Bay Area Watch: DD 40RG Olive dial Posts: 4,566	No way.

3 March 2022, 05:41 AM	#41
DubOhio "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2022 Location: Ohio Posts: 140	if I could get my hands on a BLNR there would be very few watches in this world i'd let it go for...

3 March 2022, 06:52 AM	#42
dannyp Banned Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: usa Posts: 6,765	It’s unlikely of trade two watches I got brand new for one vintage. That said, if I’d gotten those two Rolex at MSRP, it might not be the worst from an economic standpoint. The 5060 should be the most collectible Aquanaut three-hander as it’s the original and had the shortest run. But now we’re talking about appeal to actual watch collectors…

3 March 2022, 07:12 AM	#43
hutch300 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Jeff Location: PNW Posts: 1,471	zero point zero

3 March 2022, 08:14 AM	#44
CoveWatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: SoCal Watch: Rolex & AP Posts: 4,535	Personally wouldn't and the 36mm likely wears noticeably smaller than your current two watches being traded. I would absolutely try it on before even considering it. There's always 5167 also, albeit more costly

3 March 2022, 10:00 AM	#45
Driver8 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: UK Posts: 2,872	If you bought the 126710BLNR and the 126610LV at retail, then the cash stacks up just fine IMO. However, I wouldn't do it for a 5060A. Now if you'd said a 5167A instead... then I'd say definitely.

3 March 2022, 10:02 AM	#46
GGGMT 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Itinerant Watch: 79010sg Posts: 8,300	No Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

3 March 2022, 10:04 AM	#47
Kyjeeprealtor "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2022 Location: Kentucky Posts: 39	I personally would not

3 March 2022, 10:18 AM	#48
jb335 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: The States Watch: Cosmograph Daytona Posts: 7,378	Isn’t that the 36mm Aquanaut? If so, NO WAY. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

3 March 2022, 06:16 PM	#50
MOXIDUST "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2021 Real Name: Clark Kent Location: Earth Watch: Didn't found yet Posts: 41	for a 35mm aquanaut NEVER

3 March 2022, 07:40 PM	#51
George58 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2021 Location: Home Watch: Patek Aquanaut Posts: 837	I would love mine you're not gong to regret it's rare, great on the wrist and it's a PATEK

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)