ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 March 2024, 02:23 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,361
|
Dive Watch 14060
Is it me or is the 14060 pretty thin for a 1000ft dive watch??
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
13 March 2024, 02:37 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,887
|
Well it's been tested to over 300m,but in the real world most scuba divers would stick to around 40m or less.Tbe deepest dive just using scuba gear was in the Red sea by Nuno Gomes just over 318m,but doubt if 95% of all dive type watches bought today ever see water than perhaps a dip in the pool or in the shower.And myself have dived down to 63m wearing my 1980s 5513 that's the dive watch before the 14060 with no problems.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
13 March 2024, 02:42 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 22,223
|
I have quite a few dive watches but haven't spent much time below 30'.
__________________
Oh, look at the time... Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
13 March 2024, 02:44 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,361
|
Quote:
I should’ve added that it’s impressive. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.