Omega Ed White 321

[1William]

Nice pictures.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by soulsea

Thank you ... heres's one more. :)

Yep, that’s the money shot

[ButtButt]

So so good, congrats!

[fooey]

Originally Posted by soulsea

We buy watches for very different reasons.

No we don't!!

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

[Travelller]

Originally Posted by soulsea

Just wow!!! :)

Congrats & enjoy that most awesome timepiece!!!

[PandaLover]

Beautiful

[ap1]

That looks like sedna in that lighting

[masochistsr]

is the 321 movement less accurate than the 3861?

[logo]

Originally Posted by masochistsr

is the 321 movement less accurate than the 3861?

Only if you measure it

[ap1]

Originally Posted by logo

Only if you measure it

The 321 is for the eyes

[Cru Jones]

Originally Posted by ap1

The 321 is for the eyes

I would say, 321 is for the eyes and the heart.

[the dark knight]

I can't help but compare this watch to the Daytona (this is TRF after all), and I'm increasingly desiring one because it reminds me of why I originally wanted a Daytona all those years ago. Back before the hype, when grey market was where you go for a small discount from MSRP for a lightly worn Daytona.

I remember Daytona was the 2nd Rolex I wanted after I got my Sub, mainly because it was still a solid durable steel Rolex, but really the only one that wasn't readily available. I liked the idea of having a watch that most people wouldn't recognize, but the ones that did wouldn't think "hype" or "maybe more money than sense" but rather "he must really like that watch because it takes some patience and legwork to get it". Because that would be the story, with a little extra legwork and some patience, one could get a steel Daytona back then.

I have similar feelings about the Ed White. Most won't recognize it, some will dismiss it as another moonwatch they see more frequently now thanks to the MoonSwatch, but those that actually recognize it will think "he must really like that watch".

So yea, I'm really tempted to put my name down at the AD for one.

[nyc2la]

[1William]

Originally Posted by the dark knight

I can't help but compare this watch to the Daytona (this is TRF after all), and I'm increasingly desiring one because it reminds me of why I originally wanted a Daytona all those years ago. Back before the hype, when grey market was where you go for a small discount from MSRP for a lightly worn Daytona.

I remember Daytona was the 2nd Rolex I wanted after I got my Sub, mainly because it was still a solid durable steel Rolex, but really the only one that wasn't readily available. I liked the idea of having a watch that most people wouldn't recognize, but the ones that did wouldn't think "hype" or "maybe more money than sense" but rather "he must really like that watch because it takes some patience and legwork to get it". Because that would be the story, with a little extra legwork and some patience, one could get a steel Daytona back then.

I have similar feelings about the Ed White. Most won't recognize it, some will dismiss it as another moonwatch they see more frequently now thanks to the MoonSwatch, but those that actually recognize it will think "he must really like that watch".

So yea, I'm really tempted to put my name down at the AD for one.

Very good comment and one that I can agree with. I went Submariner first and then Daytona when I started out over 30 years ago. Two watch heaven for me and I think sometimes it would have been nice to stop there but you know how it goes. I am not opposed to the concept of the 321 in my collection but have so enjoyed my 1861, and two 3861's that I have not seriously consider the 321. If I could get exposure to one in person I would easily know if it is a watch for me. But I have not been able to handle one so I will continue to admire from afar.

[A.O.]

Beautiful movement. I love a column wheel chrono!!!

[Mimar2910]

It's a good one to buy, enjoy it.

[sycopupy]

If I were after a Speedy, this would definitely be the one I want. Followed closely by the 50th Silver Snoopy.

[NardinNut]

[1William]

Great picture.

[GB-man]

Excellent shot

[soulsea]

Ed Red? :)

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by soulsea

Ed Red? :)

]

I see what you did there

[1William]

Nice.

[njlam]

Is the 321 Ed White getting any easier to get at a Boutique?

I am seeing a lot of them, with recently issued warranty cards, offered on the grey market.

Why can't the boutiques sell to those of us who plan on keeping the watches?

[Talbel]

I was fortunate enough to unexpectedly pick one of these up the other day. Honestly, in person it exceeded my expectations. In response to the original OP’s question, in my opinion this isn’t a watch made to please the masses, this this for watch geeks like myself, who love the history that this watch represents along with the skill and craftsmanship it took to recreate it. I was that kid who at 4 years old in 1969, watched the moon landing (on an 3 channel TV) and became instantly fascinated by all things outer space so this watch speaks to me and brings back a lot of memories. To me the combination of its history, the men who wore it and my own memories give it a soul like no other watch I own. Yes, I know I am being incredibly over dramatic. 😁 I can’t get that from any other watch, nor can I put a price on it. Compared to a Daytona or many other watches, very few will have a similar reaction to this watch. I think the demographic is for those who love the history as much as they love the watches….. like many of your here, and that is what drives the difference in premium. Ok I’m done now… sorry to ramble on!

[1William]

Originally Posted by Talbel

I was fortunate enough to unexpectedly pick one of these up the other day. Honestly, in person it exceeded my expectations. In response to the original OP’s question, in my opinion this isn’t a watch made to please the masses, this this for watch geeks like myself, who love the history that this watch represents along with the skill and craftsmanship it took to recreate it. I was that kid who at 4 years old in 1969, watched the moon landing (on an 3 channel TV) and became instantly fascinated by all things outer space so this watch speaks to me and brings back a lot of memories. To me the combination of its history, the men who wore it and my own memories give it a soul like no other watch I own. Yes, I know I am being incredibly over dramatic. 😁 I can’t get that from any other watch, nor can I put a price on it. Compared to a Daytona or many other watches, very few will have a similar reaction to this watch. I think the demographic is for those who love the history as much as they love the watches….. like many of your here, and that is what drives the difference in premium. Ok I’m done now… sorry to ramble on!

Congratulations.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by Talbel

I was fortunate enough to unexpectedly pick one of these up the other day. Honestly, in person it exceeded my expectations. In response to the original OP’s question, in my opinion this isn’t a watch made to please the masses, this this for watch geeks like myself, who love the history that this watch represents along with the skill and craftsmanship it took to recreate it. I was that kid who at 4 years old in 1969, watched the moon landing (on an 3 channel TV) and became instantly fascinated by all things outer space so this watch speaks to me and brings back a lot of memories. To me the combination of its history, the men who wore it and my own memories give it a soul like no other watch I own. Yes, I know I am being incredibly over dramatic. I can’t get that from any other watch, nor can I put a price on it. Compared to a Daytona or many other watches, very few will have a similar reaction to this watch. I think the demographic is for those who love the history as much as they love the watches….. like many of your here, and that is what drives the difference in premium. Ok I’m done now… sorry to ramble on!

Congratulations, like you I appreciate the 321 for all the things you mention.

The movement is also legend


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[quattro98]

Nice. I don't have a Daytona or a Speedy, but I've been thinking about the 321 a lot recently. It has serious watch nerd appeal while staying very under the radar.

[Talbel]

Thanks Brian. Can’t believe I forgot to include the iconic movement in my long dissertation!