![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#31 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 71,958
|
GMT would be my choice.
![]()
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 2 FA ENABLED
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Jeff
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,446
|
I prefer a 16700 and I would not let either watch pressure you. The hunt is fun and if you compromise you will be disappointed. I recently added a 2006 unpolished full set 16613ln that took me over a year to find at the condition (with a fair price). I saw many LB's in that time. I'd go sub based on what you already have. It punches above its weight class.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: New York
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
I’m so glad you wrote this. I just spent about an hour looking on chrono for an lb with 1) no holes case 2) gold through clasp and 3) not overpolished It is extremely difficult to find, let alone at a fair price. I may “settle” for one with holes and fully steel clasp just so I can prioritize condition, because the clasp gets worn down anyway Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Alan
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
|
I have had a ceramic Bluesy 116613 and sold it to get a 16710 Pepsi which i will never sell. The Jubilee clinches it too!
All steel is just more wearable for me though i love the blue sunburst dial to look at , just didn't love the gold. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.