ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
Today, 03:54 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: South Coast UK
Posts: 20
|
I own 2 Tudor date subs a 14060 Sub, BB58 and an Explorer II. In my watch rotation I find the date versions are used more frequently- I like to check the date, like the cyclops and like to hear the date change if I’m up late🙂.
When not in use the no dates are easier to get going as well so they tend to stay off my wrist longer than the date versions. |
Today, 04:01 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Croatia
Posts: 285
|
Over time, I found that my preference is to keep things simple. So, comparing the ND with either Exp2 or GMT II as these are the only ones I have alongside the Sub, the answer is simple...
|
Today, 04:04 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2024
Location: Boston
Posts: 17
|
|
Today, 04:55 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: London
Watch: 124060
Posts: 313
|
|
Today, 05:43 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: .
Posts: 362
|
In fact the Sub is more popular among watch collectors and afficionados since it is more symmetrical and a diver. As for the Sub Date, it might be more useful for people with the need for such complication or if it is their only watch.
|
Today, 05:49 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 345
|
I think Rolex did a tremendous service by increasing the no-date models when they added the OP line. Prior to, most people had two realistic options - Explorer and sub (one look and model) as the Daytona was relatively expensive and unavailable. I think people are now more accepting of no-date models.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (3 members and 1 guests) | |
R-Star , whatsthetime? , Tuma |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.